| Literature DB >> 36013751 |
Xingquan Du1,2, Zhong Huang2, Yi Ding3, Wei Xu4, Man Zhang2, Lubin Wei1, Hairui Yang2.
Abstract
With the widespread application of circulating fluidized bed (CFB) combustion technology, the popularity of CFB ash (CFBA) has increased dramatically and its production and large-scale utilization have become increasingly important. In the context of carbon neutrality peaking, using CFBA as a cement admixture as an effective method of resource utilization not only reduces the pressures caused by carbon emissions in the cement industry but also solves the environmental problems caused by CFBA depositing. However, the formation conditions of CFBA are worse than those of traditional pulverized coal boilers. CFB ash is the combustion product of coal at 850 °C-950 °C, and the characteristics of CFBA usually include a loose and porous structure with many amorphous substances. Furthermore, it has the disadvantages of large particle size, high water-demand ratio, and low activity index when it is directly used as a cement admixture. In this study, CFBA (including fly ash (CFBFA) and bottom ash (CFBBA)) produced by a CFB boiler without furnace desulfurization with limestone was used as a cement admixture material, and the effect of grinding on the fineness, water-demand ratio, and activity index of CFBA were studied. The experimental results showed that the grinding effect could significantly reduce the fineness and water-demand ratio of CFBA as a cement mixture and improve the activity index. With the increase in the grinding time, the water-demand ratio of CFBA first decreased and then increased. CFBBA ground for 10 min and CFBFA ground for 4 min can reduce the water-demand ratio of CFBA by up to 105% and increase the compressive strength of 28-day-old CFBA cement by 7.05%. The grinding process can ensure that CFBA meets the Chinese standards for a cement admixture and realize the resource utilization of CFBA.Entities:
Keywords: activity index; cement admixture; circulating fluidized bed ash; grinding; water-demand ratio
Year: 2022 PMID: 36013751 PMCID: PMC9415779 DOI: 10.3390/ma15165610
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.748
Figure 1Experimental process.
The composition of mortar used for testing the water-demand ratio of CFBA.
| Type of Mortar | PI42.5 Cement/g | CFBBA/g | CFBFA/g | Sand/g | Deionized Water/g |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contrast mortar | 250 | - | - | 750 | W1 |
| Test mortar | 175 | 52.5 | 22.5 | 750 | W2 |
The composition of mortar used for testing strength of CFBA.
| Type of Mortar | PI42.5 Cement/g | CFBBA/g | CFBFA/g | Sand/g | Deionized Water/g |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contrast mortar | 450 | - | - | 1350 | 225 |
| Test mortar | 315 | 94.5 | 40.5 | 1350 | 225 |
Chemical composition of CFB ash.
| Compound | SiO2 | Al2O3 | Fe2O3 | CaO | TiO2 | MgO | K2O | Na2O | SO3 | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFBFA | 45.42 | 24.07 | 12.17 | 6.14 | 5.63 | 2.37 | 1.69 | 0.542 | 0.505 | 1.463 |
| CFBBA | 41.84 | 24.29 | 17.17 | 4.71 | 6.32 | 1.51 | 1.65 | 0.569 | 0.450 | 1.651 |
Comparison of physical and chemical characteristics of CFBA with Chinese standards.
| Project | Second-Class Pulverized Coal Ash Standard | CFBFA | CFBBA |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fineness | ≤30.0 | 15.8 | 100 |
| Water-demand ratio/% | ≤105 | 110 | - |
| LOI/% | ≤8.0 | 2.56 | 1.17 |
| Moisture content/% | ≤1.0 | 0.30 | 0.31 |
| SO3 mass fractions/% | ≤3.0 | 0.505 | 0.450 |
| free CaO mass fractions/% | ≤1.0 | 0.22 | 0.41 |
| SiO2, Al2O3, and Fe2O3 total mass Fractions/% | ≥70.0 | 81.66 | 83.30 |
| Density/(g/cm3) | ≤2.6 | 2.44 | 2.59 |
| Activity index/% | ≥70.0 | - | - |
Figure 2SEM images of CFBA.
Figure 3Effect of grinding time on the fineness of CFBBA.
Figure 4SEM images of CFBA with different grinding times: (a) 4 min, (b) 8 min, (c) 16 min, and (d) 20 min.
Figure 5Effect of grinding time on the particle size distribution of CFBBA.
Main data of particle size distribution of CFBBA with different grinding times.
| Sample | d(0.1)/μm | d(0.5)/μm | d(0.9)/μm | Sample | d(0.1)/μm | d(0.5)/μm | d(0.9)/μm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFBBA1 | 14.992 | 226.655 | 615.847 | CFBBA9 | 1.268 | 9.194 | 35.649 |
| CFBBA2 | 6.612 | 140.303 | 615.358 | CFBBA10 | 1.207 | 8.42 | 33.960 |
| CFBBA3 | 3.865 | 62.734 | 513.686 | CFBBA12 | 1.058 | 6.914 | 28.272 |
| CFBBA4 | 2.534 | 30.974 | 254.954 | CFBBA14 | 0.986 | 6.084 | 25.524 |
| CFBBA5 | 2.205 | 24.383 | 240.411 | CFBBA16 | 0.913 | 5.26 | 21.982 |
| CFBBA6 | 1.710 | 14.972 | 58.471 | CFBBA18 | 0.878 | 4.92 | 23.416 |
| CFBBA7 | 1.498 | 11.967 | 45.674 | CFBBA20 | 0.878 | 5.687 | 28.919 |
| CFBBA8 | 1.368 | 10.413 | 40.727 |
Figure 6Effect of grinding time on the specific surface area of CFBBA.
Figure 7Effect of CFBBA grinding time on the water-demand ratio of CFBA.
Figure 8Effect of particle porosity of CFBA on water-demand ratio.
Figure 9Effect of the specific surface area of CFBA on water-demand ratio.
Figure 10Effect of CFBFA grinding time on the water-demand ratio of CFBA with a ratio of CFBFA to CFBBA of 7:3.
Figure 11Compressive strength of mortar with different grinding times of CFBBA.
Figure 12Flexural strength of mortar with different grinding times of CFBBA.
Figure 13Activity index of CFBBA mortar with different grinding times.