| Literature DB >> 31847325 |
Wei-Ting Lin1, Kae-Long Lin2, Kailun Chen3, Kinga Korniejenko4, Marek Hebda4, Michał Łach4.
Abstract
Recently, many people around the world have been concerned with environmental protection and sustainability. The goal of various countries' research has been focused on how to regenerate existing resources. Circulation fluidized bed combustion (CFBC) technology is one of the emerging combustion technologies for electricity generation and produces more than 800,000 tons of CFBC fly ash (CFA) per year for combustion. CFA has been widely applied in cement additive, new building materials and cement-based materials. The goal of this study was to discuss the engineering properties of roller-compacted concrete containing CFA. Test subjects included compressive strength, flexural strength, absorption, setting time, unit weight, sulfate resistance, SEM microscopic observations and XRD ingredient analysis. Test results indicate the following: (1) using CFA as a substitute of fine aggregates up to 10 wt.% would improve the development of later flexural strength; (2) the increases in pre-pressure would increase the compressive strength and unit weight and decrease absorption; (3) using CFA would reduce the initial setting time by 30%-60% and reduce the final setting time by 16%-20%; (4) using CFA would reduce the absorption; (5) using CFA would reduce the unit weight by 0.5%-2.8%, and the increases in pre-pressure would increase the unit weight by about 0.9%-2.1%; (6) CaO in CFA helps to improve sulfate resistance; (7) scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observation shows that the increases in pre-pressure would reduce the pores; and (8) X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis shows that the inclusion of CFA would increase the content of Ca(OH)2 in concrete.Entities:
Keywords: Circulating fluidized bed combustion technology; SEM; XRD; green materials; sulfate resistance
Year: 2019 PMID: 31847325 PMCID: PMC6947612 DOI: 10.3390/ma12244204
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of circulation fluidized bed combustion (CFBC) fly ash (CFA).
Heavy metal content of CFA.
| Metal | Test Results (ppm) | Control Standard (ppm) |
|---|---|---|
| Chromium (Cr) | 4.43 | 250 |
| Nickel (Ni) | 191.97 | 200 |
| Copper (Cu) | 1.93 | 400 |
| Zinc (Zn) | - | 2000 |
| Arsenic (As) | - | 60 |
| Cadmium (Cd) | - | 20 |
| Lead (Pd) | 2.02 | 2000 |
Chemical constituents of CFA.
| Chemical Constituent | Percentage (wt.%) |
|---|---|
| Loss on ignition (LOI) | 7.83 |
| Silicon dioxide (SiO2) | 3.72 |
| Aluminum oxide (Al2O3) | 0.55 |
| Ferric oxide (Fe2O3) | 0.57 |
| Calcium oxide (CaO) | 55.84 |
| Magnesium oxide (MgO) | 1.62 |
| Sulfur trioxide (SO3) | 29.09 |
| Potassium oxide (K2O) | 0.34 |
| Sodium oxide (Na2O) | 0.10 |
| Strontium oxide (SrO) | 0.1 |
Mix designs of specimens containing different amounts of CFA (kg/m3).
| Mix No. | Water | Cement | Fine Aggregates | Coarse Aggregates | CFA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50N | 134.4 | 322.0 | 717.4 | 1245 | 0.0 |
| 50F10 | 645.6 | 71.8 | |||
| 50F20 | 573.9 | 143.5 | |||
| 50F30 | 502.2 | 215.2 | |||
| 100N | 717.4 | 0.0 | |||
| 100F10 | 645.6 | 71.8 | |||
| 100F20 | 573.9 | 143.5 | |||
| 100F30 | 502.2 | 215.2 | |||
| 150N | 717.4 | 0.0 | |||
| 150F10 | 645.6 | 71.8 | |||
| 150F20 | 573.9 | 143.5 | |||
| 150F30 | 502.2 | 215.2 |
Test items and referenced standards. SEM: scanning electron microscopy.
| Test Type | Test Method | Specimen Dimensions (mm) and Types | Referenced Standards |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fresh properties | Setting time test | 150 × 150 × 150 (mortar) | ASTM C403 |
| Unit weight test | φ 100 × 200 (concrete) | - | |
| Vebe test | - | ASTM C1170 | |
| Mechanical properties | Compressive strength test | φ 100 × 200 (concrete) | ASTM C39 |
| Flexural strength test | 150 × 150 × 530 (concrete) | ASTM C78 | |
| Durability | Absorption test | φ 100 × 200 (concrete) | ASTM C642 |
| Sulfate resistance test | φ 100 × 200 (concrete) | ASTM C88 | |
| Characterization | SEM observation | 10 × 10 × 3 (mortar) | ASTM C1723 |
| XRD spectrum analysis | Powders | ASTM C1365 |
Figure 2Appearance of roller-compacted concrete (RCC) specimens containing various amounts of CFA.
Figure 3Compressive strength development curves (pre-pressure = 50 g/cm2).
Figure 4Compressive strength development curves (pre-pressure = 100 g/cm2).
Figure 5Compressive strength development curves (pre-pressure = 150 g/cm2).
Figure 6Flexural strength development of the specimens.
Absorption of specimens.
| Mix No. | Absorption (%) | Difference from the Control Group (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 50N | 3.2 | 0 |
| 50F10 | 4.3 | 1.1 |
| 50F20 | 4.8 | 1.6 |
| 50F30 | 5.7 | 2.5 |
| 100N | 3.7 | 0 |
| 100F10 | 4.6 | 0.9 |
| 100F20 | 5.0 | 1.3 |
| 100F30 | 5.2 | 1.5 |
| 150N | 3.5 | 0 |
| 150F10 | 4.1 | 0.6 |
| 150F20 | 5.0 | 1.5 |
| 150F30 | 5.2 | 1.7 |
Setting times of specimens.
| Mix No. | N | F10 | F20 | F30 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial setting time (min) | 80 | 30 | 55 | - |
| Final setting time (min) | 150 | 120 | 125 | - |
Unit weight of specimens.
| Mix No. | Unit Weight (kg/cm3) |
|---|---|
| 50N | 2451.0 |
| 50F10 | 2438.3 |
| 50F20 | 2402.2 |
| 50F30 | 2381.0 |
| 100N | 2474.3 |
| 100F10 | 2456.3 |
| 100F20 | 2408.5 |
| 100F30 | 2405.4 |
| 150N | 2504.0 |
| 150F10 | 2474.3 |
| 150F20 | 2418.1 |
| 150F30 | 2413.9 |
Compressive strength of specimens before and after sodium sulfate immersion.
| Mix No. | Pre-Test Compressive Strength (MPa) | Post-Test Compressive Strength (MPa) | Variation in Strength (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 50N | 47.7 | 46.5 | −2.5 |
| 50F10 | 33.6 | 44.3 | 31.8 |
| 50F20 | 37.8 | 42.2 | 11.6 |
| 50F30 | 36.4 | 39.6 | 8.8 |
| 100N | 43.3 | 41.8 | −3.5 |
| 100F10 | 38.4 | 47.6 | 24.0 |
| 100F20 | 39.4 | 41.3 | 4.8 |
| 100F30 | 38.6 | 42.9 | 11.1 |
| 150N | 46.2 | 44.2 | −4.3 |
| 150F10 | 37.6 | 43.3 | 15.2 |
| 150F20 | 38.6 | 49.8 | 29.0 |
| 150F30 | 47.7 | 46.3 | 12.4 |
Figure 7SEM observations (pre-pressure = 50 g/cm2, ×3000); (a) 50N specimen (b) 50F10 specimen; (c) 50F20 specimen (d) 50F30 specimen.
Figure 8SEM observations (pre-pressure = 100 g/cm2, ×3000).
Figure 9SEM observations (pre-pressure = 150 g/cm2, ×3000).
Figure 10SEM photos with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis.
Figure 11XRD spectrum for various specimens.