| Literature DB >> 36013334 |
Seonggyu Bang1, Bereket Molla Tanga1, Xun Fang1, Gyeonghwan Seong1, Islam M Saadeldin1,2,3, Ahmad Yar Qamar4, Sanghoon Lee1, Keun-Jung Kim5, Yun-Jae Park5, Abdelbagi Hamad Talha Nabeel6, Il-Jeoung Yu6, Akila Cooray7, Kyu Pil Lee7, Jongki Cho1.
Abstract
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced during freeze-thaw procedures cause oxidative damage to the sperm, reducing fertility. We aimed to improve the post-thaw quality of pig sperm by quercetin (QRN) supplementation to reduce the cryodamage associated with the freeze-thaw procedure. Four equal aliquots of pooled boar semen were diluted with a freezing extender supplemented with different concentrations of QRN (0, 25, 50, and 100 µM) and then were subjected to cryopreservation in liquid nitrogen. Semen analysis was performed following 7 days of cryopreservation. Results demonstrated that the semen samples supplemented with 50 µM QRN significantly improved the post-thaw sperm quality than those subjected to other supplementations (p < 0.05). Semen samples supplemented with 50 µM QRN showed significantly improved plasma membrane functional integrity (47.5 ± 1.4 vs. 43.1 ± 4.1, 45.3 ± 1.7, and 44.1 ± 1.4) and acrosome integrity (73.6 ± 3.4 vs. 66.3 ± 2.4, 66.7 ± 3.6, and 68.3 ± 32.9) as compared to the control, 25 µM, and 100 µM QRN groups, respectively. The mitochondrial activity of the 50 µM QRN group was greater than control and 25 µM QRN groups (43.0 ± 1.0 vs. 39.1 ± 0.9 and 41.9 ± 1.0) but showed no difference with the 100 µM QRN group. Moreover, the 50 µM QRN group showed a higher sperm number displaced to 1 cm and 3 cm points in the artificial mucus than other groups. Therefore, supplementing the freezing extender with QRN can serve as an effective tool to reduce the magnitude of oxidative damage associated with sperm freezing.Entities:
Keywords: cryopreservation; oxidative damage; pig sperm; quercetin
Year: 2022 PMID: 36013334 PMCID: PMC9410179 DOI: 10.3390/life12081155
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Life (Basel) ISSN: 2075-1729
Primer sequences used for the analysis of gene expression in post-thaw porcine sperm.
| Gene | Primer Sequence (5′–3′) | Accession No. |
|---|---|---|
|
| F: AGAAGGTGGTGAAGCAGG | XM_003126531 |
|
| F: AAGCGCATTGGAGATGAACT | AJ606301 |
|
| F: ACCGACCCAGAGATGGTCAC | AJ001204 |
|
| F: GAAACCCCTAGTGCCATCAA | NM_214285 |
|
| F: CTGAATCAGAAGCGGAAACC | AF216205 |
|
| F: CAACGCCTCTACCAGTCTGC | ss319605207 |
|
| F: CATGAGATAGACTGCCCTCTGA | ss319605203 |
Evaluation of toxicity by concentration of DMSO in semen cryopreservation.
| DMSO (%) | Motility (%) | Progress | VCL (μm/s) | VAP (μm/s) | VSL (μm/s) | Straightness | Linearity (%) | ALH (μm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 37.66 ± 5.55 a | 7.78 ± 2.76 | 31.00 ± 1.34 a | 18.72 ± 1.05 a | 10.06 ± 1.25 a | 58.43 ± 4.43 a | 38.87 ± 5.15 a | 1.15 ± 0.02 a |
| 0.5 | 38.13 ± 0.32 a | 6.91 ± 0.24 | 23.25 ± 1.76 b | 13.66 ± 1.28 ab | 4.68 ± 0.89 b | 38.72 ± 0.67 b | 19.70 ± 3.40 b | 0.87 ± 0.08 b |
| 1.0 | 37.11 ± 0.91a | 8.26 ± 2.26 | 21.94 ± 2.78 b | 10.04 ± 1.48b | 4.13 ± 1.37 b | 40.11 ± 2.19 b | 15.85 ± 2.95 b | 0.83 ± 0.75 b |
| 1.5 | 33.96 ± 1.96 ab | 6.06 ± 1.24 | 25.91 ± 3.44 b | 14.09 ± 3.03 ab | 5.51 ± 1.82 b | 45.96 ± 5.45 b | 20.42 ± 5.45 b | 0.93 ± 0.78 b |
| 2.0 | 27.24 ± 1.71 b | 3.86 ± 0.48 | 20.83 ± 2.15 b | 11.81 ± 1.18 b | 5.55 ± 1.10 b | 47.42 ± 11.48 b | 26.23 ± 6.95 a | 0.88 ± 0.43 b |
Curvilinear velocity (VCL), average path velocity (VAP), straight-line velocity (VSL), amplitude of lateral head displacement (ALH). Values with different lowercase superscripts letters (a and b) in the same column differ significantly (p < 0.05, n = 3).
Assessment of kinematic parameters of quercetin (QRN) for semen cryopreservation.
| Groups | Motility (%) | Progress Motility (%) | VCL (µm/s) | VAP (µm/s) | VSL (µm/s) | Straightness (%) | Linearity (%) | ALH (µm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 29.13 ± 0.92 b | 14.60 ± 2.73 | 74.29 ± 5.04 a | 37.36 ± 2.90 a | 15.76 ± 2.15 | 41.11 ± 2.37 | 21.26 ± 1.67 a | 2.15 ± 0.10 a |
| 25 µM QRN | 30.89 ± 1.15 ab | 10.81 ± 1.35 | 45.73 ± 13.00 b | 21.85 ± 2.91 b | 8.18 ± 1.60 | 36.25 ± 4.22 | 17.24 ± 3.52 a | 1.44 ± 0.13 b |
| 50 µM QRN | 33.73 ± 0.85 a | 16.16 ± 3.25 | 64.74 ± 10.36 a | 30.17 ± 6.64 a | 13.40 ± 4.73 | 44.19 ± 3.56 | 17.97 ± 2.78 a | 1.82 ± 0.21 a |
| 100 µM QRN | 28.57 ± 1.02 b | 10.89 ± 1.90 | 62.07 ± 11.30 a | 27.80 ± 5.63 a | 9.63 ± 1.96 | 36.48 ± 2.11 | 13.11 ± 1.26 b | 1.84 ± 0.28 a |
Values carrying different superscripts (a and b) in the same column are significantly different when p < 0.05 (n = 8).
Effects of supplementation of quercetin on the post-thaw integrity of plasma membrane, mitochondrial activity, and acrosome integrity of boar sperm.
| Groups | HOS (%) | Mitochondrial Activity (%) | Acrosome Integrity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 43.1 ± 1.5 b | 39.1 ± 0.3 c | 66.3 ± 0.8 b |
| 25 µM QRN | 45.3 ± 0.6 b | 41.9 ± 0.3 b | 66.7 ± 1.3 b |
| 50 µM QRN | 47.5 ± 0.5 ab | 43.0 ± 0.3 b | 73.6 ± 1.2 a |
| 100 µM QRN | 44.1 ± 0.5 b | 43.2 ± 0.6 ab | 68.3 ± 1.0 b |
a–c, values with different superscript lowercase letters in a column vary significantly (p < 0.05, n = 8); HOS, hypo-osmotic swelling; QRN, quercetin.
Effects of supplementation of quercetin on the mucus penetration ability of post-thaw boar sperm.
| Groups | Number of Sperm Penetrating Mucus | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 cm | 3 cm | |
| Control | 55.0 ± 2.2 c | 16.2 ± 1.0 b |
| 25 µM QRN | 57.4 ± 1.8 b | 18.9 ± 1.1 b |
| 50 µM QRN | 66.7 ± 1.9 a | 21.9 ± 1.1 a |
| 100 µM QRN | 54.3 ± 2.2 b | 18.7 ± 0.7 b |
Values with different superscripts (a–c) are significantly different when p < 0.05 (n = 8).
Figure 1Effect of quercetin on ROS levels of post-thaw boar sperm. (a) Control, (b) QRN 25, (c) QRN 50, and (d) QRN 100. (a–d) Results of DCFDA/PI staining and ROS analysis by flow cytometry. The bar graph is the result of comparing the ROS index value using the flow cytometry result. Values carrying different asterisks (* and **) are significantly different when p < 0.05 (n = 8).
Figure 2Detection of annexin V-FITC in post-thaw boar sperm. (a) Control, (b) QRN 25, (c) QRN 50, and (d) QRN 100. (a–d) Results of annexin V-FITC/PI staining and analyzed using flow cytometry. Values carrying asterisk (*) are significantly different when p < 0.05 (n = 8).
Figure 3Theoretical absolute membrane potential indicated by DiSC3(5) fluorescence intensity. (A) the values of DiSC3(5) fluorescence intensity of control and QRN-treated groups. (B) Estimation of the theoretical membrane potential. Asterisk (*) indicate statistical significance when p < 0.05.
Figure 4Gene expression levels of pro-apoptotic BCL2-associated X (BAX), Bcl-2 homologous antagonist/killer (BAK), anti-apoptotic B-cell lymphoma-like1 (BCL-2l), B-cell lymphoma-extra-large (Bcl-xl), cyclooxygenase isoenzyme type 2(COX-2), and phospholipase C zeta (PLCz) using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Values carrying different letters (a, b, and c) are significantly different when p < 0.05 (n = 8).