| Literature DB >> 36012987 |
Mercè Giner1,2, María Angeles Vázquez-Gámez1,3, María José Miranda1, Jesús Bocio-Nuñez1, Francisco Jesús Olmo-Montes1, Miguel Angel Rico1,3, Miguel Angel Colmenero1, María-José Montoya-García1,3.
Abstract
Circulating osteogenic precursor (COP) cells are peripheral blood cells with a capacity for osteogenesis. The objective of our study was to ascertain the percentage of COPs as an early biomarker of osteoporosis and the effect of these cells in response to Denosumab (DmAb) (anti-resorptive) or to Teriparatide (TPDP) (anabolic) as very effective drugs in the treatment of the illness. A first study was conducted on healthy volunteers, with three age ranges, to determine the percentage of COPs and relate it to their anthropometric and biochemical characteristics, followed by a second longitudinal study on patients with osteoporosis, whereby one group of patients was treated with TPTD and another with DmAb. All were analyzed by cytometry for COP percentage in blood, bone turnover markers, and bone mass. Our findings show that COPs are influenced by age and become more prolific in the stages of growth and skeletal maturation. A higher percentage of COPs is found in osteoporotic disease, which could constitute a predictive marker thereof. We also show how treatment with TPTD or DmAb mobilizes circulating osteogenic precursors in the blood. Significant increases in % COPs were observed after 12 months of treatment with Dmb (21.9%) and TPTD (17%). These results can be related to an increase in osteogenesis and, consequently, a better and more efficient repair of bone tissue.Entities:
Keywords: Denosumab; Teriparatide; circulating osteogenic progenitor cells; metabolic bone disorders; osteoporosis
Year: 2022 PMID: 36012987 PMCID: PMC9409740 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11164749
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.964
Figure 1Flow diagram of the longitudinal study design. TPTD = Teriparatide; DmAb = Denosumab; COP = Circulating osteogenic precursor; BQ = Bioquimical determinations; BTM = Bone turnover markers; BMD = Bone mineral density.
Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics.
| Children | Young Adults | Senior Adults | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 10 ± 1 | 29 ± 3 | 68 ± 8 |
|
| 6/7 | 7/6 | 6/3 |
|
| 20.41 ± 4.5 * | 22.80 ± 2.3 * | 25.9 ± 3.3 |
|
| 485.9 ± 154.1 * | 42.9 ± 3.7 | 41.5 ± 13.9 |
|
| 1.22 ± 0.103 | 0.36 ± 0.04 | 0.31 ± 0.03 |
|
| 24.06 ± 7.4 | 23.7 ± 1.6 | 32.44 ± 5.9 |
|
| 9.8 ±0.1 | 9.4 ± 0.1 | 9.6 ± 0.1 |
|
| 4.5 ± 0.1 | 3.4 ± 0.1 | 3.5 ± 0.1 |
|
| 0.723 ± 0.92 | 0.828 ± 0.14 | 0.622 ± 0.06 |
|
| 0.813 ± 0.09 | 0.8612 ± 0.31 | 0.897 ± 0.12 |
|
| 0.673 ± 0.09 | 0.969 ± 0.72 | 0.805 ± 0.15 |
All data lie within the mean ± standard deviation; * p < 0.05. P1NP = N-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen; CTX = C-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen; 25OHVD3 = 25 hydroxyvitamin D3; Ca = calcium; p = phosphorus.
Figure 2Percentage of COP (OCN+) among the control groups defined (children, n = 13; young adults, n = 13; and senior adults, n = 9; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.001).
Anthropometric and biochemical characteristics of two treatment groups in basal conditions: Teriparatide group (TPTD) and Denosumab group (DmAb).
| TPTD ( | DmAb ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 58 ± 2 | 66 ± 10 | 0.142 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 24.5 ± 3.7 | 26.3 ± 5.4 | 0.574 |
| CTX (pg/mL) | 0.28 ± 0.05 | 0.37 ± 0.05 | 0.302 |
| P1NP (ng/mL) | 56.4 ± 11.1 | 44.01 ± 5.3 | 0.274 |
| IGF-1 (ng/mL) | 158.2 ± 30.1 | 127.7 ± 18.2 | 0.393 |
| 25OHVD3 (ng/mL) | 34.1 ± 7.9 | 35.5 ± 10.7 | 0.924 |
All data are given as the mean ± standard deviation. P1NP = N-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen; CTX = C-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen; IGF-1 = insulin growth factor 1; 25OHVD3 = 25 hydroxyvitamin D3.
Figure 3Tracking of % COP (OCN+) in each treatment group: Teriparatide (TPTD, solid line; n = 7) (basal vs. 3 months and basal vs. 6 months * p < 0.05) and Denosumab (DmAb, dashed line; n = 10) (basal vs. 12 months # p < 0.05).
Figure 4BTMs levels (CTX and P1NP) during TPTD (solid line; n = 7) and DmAb (dashed line; n = 10) treatment (basal vs. treatment: * p < 0.05).
Basal bone mineral density and 12 months after treatment with TPTD.
| TPTD ( |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basal | 12 Months | % Change | ||
|
| 0.64 ± 0.12 | 0.66 ± 0.17 | 3.1 | 0.696 |
|
| 0.82 ± 0.09 | 0.82 ± 0.11 | 0 | 0.321 |
|
| 0.66 ± 0.07 | 0.65 ± 0.05 | 0 | 0.782 |
gHA = grams of Hydroxyapatite.
Basal bone mineral density and 12 months after treatment with DmAb.
| DmAb ( |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basal | 12 Months | % Change | ||
|
| 0.60 ± 0.07 | 0.61 ± 0.07 | 1.6 | 0.126 |
|
| 0.83 ± 0.11 | 0.82 ± 0.17 | 0 | 0.515 |
|
| 0.70 ± 0.12 | 0.74 ± 0.12 | 5.7 | 0.363 |
gHA = grams of Hydroxyapatite.