| Literature DB >> 36012835 |
Hui Li1, Hongyu Yang1, Alejandro Calderón-Urrea2,3, Yuanpeng Li1, Lipeng Zhang1,2, Yanlin Yu1, Jiayi Ma1, Guiying Shi1.
Abstract
Lanzhou Lily(Lilium davidii) var. unicolor, which is also known as sweet lily in China, is used as a type of food. This lily is distributed in narrow regions, propagates asexually, cultivates perennially, and cultivates commonly in serious consecutive replant problems (CRPs). Soil fumigation is commonly used to control soil-borne disease to alleviate crops' consecutive replant problems (CRPs). However, due to the improper fumigation application, it is common to cause chemical hazard to crops. In this study, we designed a two-factor experiment to explore the bacterial and fungal community structure and some specific microbial groups in the lily rhizosphere soil after chemical versus bacterial fertilizer treatments, by using a metagenomic analysis of the treated soils. The results showed that metham-sodium soil fumigation (SMF treatment) significantly decreased plant growth, as well as it significantly decreased both soil fungal diversity and abundance at the OTUs levels, while Special 8™ microbial fertilizer supplement (MF treatment) significantly improved plant growth and increased fungal diversity and abundance. Under FM treatment, Chao1 richness and Shannon's diversity increased by 6.70% and 35.09% compared to CK (no treatment). However, the bacterial diversity and abundance were not significantly changed among these treatments. The fungal and bacterial community structure were different in all treatments. In SMF treatment, the pathogenic fungal species Fusarium oxysporum increased compared to CK, but it significantly decreased in MF treatment; in MF and MMF treatments, some beneficial bacteria groups such as the bacterial phylum Proteobacteria and its member genus Sphingomonas, as well as the fungal genus Mortierella, increased compared to CK and SFM treatments, but the harmful bacterial genera Gemmatimona was decreased, as well as the harmful fungal genus Cryptococcus. Thus, we concluded that under chemical fumigation conditions, both fungal diversity loss and overall microorganism reduction, which impair multiple ecosystem function, in conjunction with the increase of harmful fungal species such as Fusarium oxysporum, are causes for soil degradation. On the other hand, under microbial fertilizer supplement, it was the fungal diversity increase, as well as these beneficial microorganisms groups' accumulation, together with those harmful groups' depletion, played important roles in restoring and improving soil health that suffered from the chemical fumigant hazard. In addition, the bacterial phylum Proteobacteria and its member genus Sphingomonas are involved in soil health recovery and promotion. The results also emphasized that whether soil is chemically fumigated or not, beneficial microorganism supplementary is effective in ensuring soil productivity.Entities:
Keywords: bacterium; chemical hazard; consecutive replant problems; fungi; metham-sodium; soil fumigation; soil health
Year: 2022 PMID: 36012835 PMCID: PMC9409919 DOI: 10.3390/jof8080847
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Fungi (Basel) ISSN: 2309-608X
The lily growth status of Lanzhou lily rhizosphere soil among different treatments: The seedling index was calculated at lily flowering stage in July 2019; Mother bulb weight means the seed bulb weight after it had grown for 1 year, and it was evaluated in October 2019; Bulb yield referred to the bulb weight after it had grown for 3 years, and it was evaluated from all the plants in each plot in October 2021: the significance is 0.05 for lower letters (a, b, c) presented in table.
| Treatments | Seedling Index | Mother Bulb Weight (g) | Bulb Yield |
|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 16.75 ± 0.98 b | 29.95 ± 1.04 ab | 19,550.83 ab |
| SFM | 18.88 ± 2.19 b | 24.34 ± 0.72 c | 17141.47 c |
| MF | 27.28 ± 0.62 a | 33.91 ± 1.46 a | 22,103.00 a |
| MMF | 16.15 ± 1.24 b | 27.76 ± 0.48 b | 18,099.97 b |
Figure 1Fungal Chao1 richness (A) and Shannon index (B) of Lanzhou lily rhizosphere soil among different treatments from Illumina NovaSeq data.
Figure 2Principal Component Analysis (PCA) showing fungal and bacterial overall structural changes of Lanzhou lily rhizosphere soil among different treatments from Illumina NovaSeq.
Figure 3The taxonomic distribution of fungi and bacteria of Lanzhou lily rhizosphere soil among different treatments from Illumina NovaSeq: top 7 fungal phyla (A) and top 30 bacterial phyla (B).
The fungal group significantly changed (p < 0.05) total reads of Lanzhou lily rhizosphere soil from Illumina NovaSeq data (the phyla with average RA > 5%, and the genera with average relative abundance > 0.1% and the species with average relative abundance > 0.05%; the accession number is ID PRJNA805390): the significance is 0.05 for lower letters (a, b, c) presented in table.
| Treatments | CK | SFM | MF | MMF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (a) enriched phyla and genera and species with microbial fertilizer supplement | ||||
|
| 1.21% b | 2.64% b | 15.25% a | 15.55% a |
|
| 0.03% c | 0.04% c | 4.92% a | 3.04% b |
|
| 0.00% c | 0.02% c | 0.42% b | 2.38% a |
|
| 0.03% c | 0.02% c | 0.11% b | 2.48% a |
|
| 0.05% c | 0.03% c | 0.59% b | 1.78% a |
|
| 0.00% b | 0.00% b | 0.01% b | 1.09% a |
|
| 0.01% c | 0.00% c | 0.27% b | 0.47% a |
|
| 0.02% c | 0.03% c | 1.69% a | 1.14% b |
|
| 0.03% c | 0.02% c | 0.40% b | 0.94% a |
|
| 0.00% b | 0.00% b | 0.03% b | 1.16% a |
|
| 0.00% c | 0.00% c | 0.58% a | 0.42% ab |
|
| 0.00% c | 0.00% c | 0.05% b | 0.74% a |
|
| 0.00% b | 0.00% b | 0.01% b | 0.34% a |
| (b) depleted phyla and genera and species with microbial fertilizer supplement | ||||
|
| 98.35% a | 96.95% a | 70.11% b | 69.64% b |
|
| 1.25% a | 0.08% b | 0.00% c | 0.00% c |
|
| 1.25% a | 0.08% b | 0.00% c | 0.00% c |
| (c) enriched or depleted phyla and genera and species with microbial fertilizer supplement | ||||
|
| 9.01% b | 0.65% c | 12.84% a | 0.82% c |
|
| 1.08% a | 0.13% b | 1.28% a | 0.09% b |
|
| 0.62% a | 0.01% c | 0.26% b | 0.06% c |
|
| 0.77% a | 0.00% b | 0.01% b | 0.00% b |
|
| 0.00% c | 0.05% b | 0.04% b | 0.45% a |
|
| 0.38% a | 0.02% c | 0.14% b | 0.00% c |
|
| 0.01% c | 0.07% bc | 0.04% bc | 0.41% a |
|
| 0.32% a | 0.00% c | 0.18% b | 0.00% c |
|
| 9.01% b | 0.65% c | 12.84% a | 0.82% c |
|
| 0.00% c | 1.24% b | 2.46% a | 0.00% c |
|
| 0.03% c | 0.10% b | 0.05% bc | 2.98% a |
|
| 1.03% a | 0.11% b | 1.25% a | 0.07% c |
|
| 0.77% a | 0.00% b | 0.01% b | 0.00% b |
|
| 0.01% c | 0.07% b | 0.04% bc | 0.41% a |
|
| 0.32% a | 0.00% c | 0.18% b | 0.00% c |
|
| 0.00% c | 0.24% a | 0.00% c | 0.08% b |
The bacterial group significantly changed (p < 0.05) total reads of Lanzhou lily rhizosphere soil from Illumina NovaSeq data (the phyla with average RA > 5%, and the genera with average relative abundance > 0.1% and the species with average relative abundance > 0.05%; the accession number is ID PRJNA805390): the significance is 0.05 for lower letters (a, b, c) presented in table.
| Treatments | CK | SFM | MF | MMF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (a) enriched phyla and genera and species with microbial fertilizer supplement | ||||
|
| 20.71% b | 23.87% b | 30.69% a | 30.98% a |
|
| 1.70% bc | 2.10% b | 4.36% a | 4.67% a |
|
| 0.48% b | 0.32% c | 0.36% bc | 0.69% a |
|
| 0.16% b | 0.25% b | 0.57% a | 0.57% a |
|
| 0.14% c | 0.19% c | 0.80% a | 0.40% b |
|
| 0.16% c | 0.10% c | 0.45% ab | 0.57% a |
|
| 0.16% bc | 0.14% c | 0.19% b | 0.28% a |
|
| 0.04% b | 0.05% b | 0.13% a | 0.16% a |
|
| 0.35% b | 0.49% b | 0.81% a | 0.87% a |
|
| 0.10% c | 0.03% c | 0.66% a | 0.29% b |
| (b) depleted phyla and genera and species with microbial fertilizer supplement | ||||
|
| 9.63% a | 7.64% b | 6.09% bc | 6.05% bc |
|
| 9.63% a | 7.64% b | 6.09% c | 6.05% c |
|
| 4.57% a | 4.51% a | 3.54% b | 3.70% b |
|
| 1.10% a | 0.98% ab | 0.78% b | 0.51% c |
|
| 0.27% a | 0.22% a | 0.09% c | 0.17% bc |
|
| 0.24% ab | 0.31% a | 0.00% c | 0.11% b |
|
| 0.10% a | 0.09% a | 0.01% b | 0.04% b |
| (c) enriched or depleted phyla and genera and species with microbial fertilizer supplement | ||||
|
| 0.22% a | 0.14% b | 0.12% c | 0.18% ab |
|
| 0.09% c | 0.23% a | 0.16% b | 0.11% bc |
Figure 4Redundancy analysis (RDA) of microorganism communities and soils physicochemical properties: microorganism included top 10 fungal genera and top 10 bacterial genera; OM, EC, AK, AN, and AP represented organic matter, electrical conductivity, available potassium, alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen, and available phosphorus, respectively.