| Literature DB >> 36012581 |
Estanislao Peixoto1, Asad Khan1, Zachary A Lewis2,3,4, Rafael Contreras-Galindo1, Wioletta Czaja1,5.
Abstract
Robust, tightly regulated DNA repair is critical to maintaining genome stability and preventing cancer. Eukaryotic DNA is packaged into chromatin, which has a profound, yet incompletely understood, regulatory influence on DNA repair and genome stability. The chromatin remodeler HELLS (helicase, lymphoid specific) has emerged as an important epigenetic regulator of DNA repair, genome stability, and multiple cancer-associated pathways. HELLS belongs to a subfamily of the conserved SNF2 ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling complexes, which use energy from ATP hydrolysis to alter nucleosome structure and packaging of chromatin during the processes of DNA replication, transcription, and repair. The mouse homologue, LSH (lymphoid-specific helicase), plays an important role in the maintenance of heterochromatin and genome-wide DNA methylation, and is crucial in embryonic development, gametogenesis, and maturation of the immune system. Human HELLS is abundantly expressed in highly proliferating cells of the lymphoid tissue, skin, germ cells, and embryonic stem cells. Mutations in HELLS cause the human immunodeficiency syndrome ICF (Immunodeficiency, Centromeric instability, Facial anomalies). HELLS has been implicated in many types of cancer, including retinoblastoma, colorectal cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and glioblastoma. Here, we review and summarize accumulating evidence highlighting important roles for HELLS in DNA repair, genome maintenance, and key pathways relevant to cancer development, progression, and treatment.Entities:
Keywords: ATP-dependent chromatin remodelers; DNA damage; DNA repair; HELLS; LSH; cancer; heterochromatin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36012581 PMCID: PMC9409174 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23169313
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Contribution of HELLS to various aspects of DNA repair and genome stability.
| Model System | Defect in DNA Repair and/or DDR | DNA Damage Sensitivity | Genome Instability | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSH-deficient MEFs | Deficient phosphorylation of ɣH2AX in response to gamma irradiation | Increased sensitivity to gamma irradiation, hydrogen peroxide, HU, MMS | Not Determined | Burrage et al., 2012 [ |
| MHCC-97L transfected with sgRNA targeting HELLS | Possible block of DNA DSB repair (assessed by ɣH2AX) | Not determined | Not determined | Law et al., 2019 [ |
| HELLS siRNA in PANC-1 and BxPC-3 | Increased DNA damage measured by γH2AX levels | Increased sensitivity to cisplatin 20 µM after 24 h | Not determined | Hou et al., 2021 [ |
| HEK293 cells carrying ICF HELLS mutations | Delay in XRCC5 accumulation at DNA damage sites, defects in NHEJ | No detected sensitivity to olaparib, MMC, TMZ | Accumulation of γH2AX signals colocalizing with centromeric regions, chromosome abnormalities, aneuploidy | Unoki et al., 2019 [ |
| HELLS siRNA in 1BR-hTert, HeLa | Increase of γH2AX, decrease of Rad51 foci (also in U2OS cells) Deficient HR in heterochromatin of G2/M cells. | Mild sensitivity to olaparib | Increase in spontaneous micronuclei, decrease in sister chromatid exchange in HeLa cells 12 h after 3 Gy | Kollárovič et al., 2019 [ |
| LSH siRNA in LPS-stimulated mouse lymphocytes | Increase of ɣH2AX, degradation of nascent DNA at stalled replication forks through macroH2A deficiency | Increased sensitivity to HU and APH | Increase in sister chromatid exchange, fragile telomeres, and chromosome aberrations | Xu et al., 2021 [ |
| HELLS siRNA in GSC387 and GSC3565 | Increased endogenous DNA damage as measured by ɣH2AX | Not determined | Not determined | Zhang et al., 2019 [ |
| LSH siRNA in U2OS cells | Reduced NHEJ | Not determined | Not determined | He et al., 2020 [ |
| MUS-30 knockout in | Possibly defect in S-phase associated DNA repair | Hypersensitivity to MMS and | Not determined | Basenko et al., 2016 [ |
| IRC-5 knockout in | Defect in cohesion loading | Sensitivity to MMS | Instability of rDNA loci | Litwin et al., 2017 [ |
| DDM1 knockout in | Deficient BER and NER repair capacity | Sensitivity to MMS | Not determined | Yao et al., 2012 [ |
Abbreviations: BER, base excision repair; DDR, DNA damage response; DSB, double-strand breaks; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; MEF, mouse embryonic fibroblast; MMS, methyl methanesulfonate; NER, nucleotide excision repair; NHEJ, nonhomologous end joining; HU, hydroxyurea; MMC, mitomycin C; TMZ, temozolomide; APH, aphidicolin; TBP, tert-Butyl hydroperoxide.
Figure 1Association of HELLS with multiple pathways involved in cancer development, progression and influencing responses to therapy.