| Literature DB >> 36012226 |
Enheng Zhu1, Xia Xiang1, Sidi Wan1, Huabiao Miao1, Nanyu Han1,2,3,4, Zunxi Huang1,2,3,4.
Abstract
Lipases are remarkable biocatalysts and are broadly applied in many industry fields because of their versatile catalytic capabilities. Considering the harsh biotechnological treatment of industrial processes, the activities of lipase products are required to be maintained under extreme conditions. In our current study, Gibbs free energy calculations were performed to predict potent thermostable Thermomyces lanuginosus lipase (TLL) variants by Rosetta design programs. The calculating results suggest that engineering on R209 may greatly influence TLL thermostability. Accordingly, ten TLL mutants substituted R209 were generated and verified. We demonstrate that three out of ten mutants (R209H, R209M, and R209I) exhibit increased optimum reaction temperatures, melting temperatures, and thermal tolerances. Based on molecular dynamics simulation analysis, we show that the stable hydrogen bonding interaction between H198 and N247 stabilizes the local configuration of the 250-loop in the three R209 mutants, which may further contribute to higher rigidity and improved enzymatic thermostability. Our study provides novel insights into a single residue, R209, and the 250-loop, which were reported for the first time in modulating the thermostability of TLL. Additionally, the resultant R209 variants generated in this study might be promising candidates for future-industrial applications.Entities:
Keywords: Gibbs free energy; Rosetta; lipase; thermostability
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36012226 PMCID: PMC9408933 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23168963
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Sources and thermal stability of microbial lipases.
| Lipase | Source | Topt | T1/2 | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TLL |
| 40 °C | 30 min (80 °C) | this article |
| PCL |
| 25 °C | 4.70 min (45 °C) | [ |
| LIP2 |
| 37 °C | ~75 min (50 °C) | [ |
| CRL |
| 40 °C | 4.2 min (50 °C) | [ |
| RCL |
| 40 °C | 4 min (60 °C) | [ |
| Lipr27RCL |
| 40 °C | ~25 min (60 °C) | [ |
| SML |
| 42 °C | 60 min (67 °C) | [ |
| ELBn12 | 60 °C | ~20 min (70 °C) | [ | |
| Wt-L2 | 70 °C | 8 h (60 °C) | [ | |
| RD |
| 70 °C | ~1 h (75 °C) | [ |
| CalB |
| N.A | 49.3 min (50 °C) | [ |
Figure 1SDS-PAGE analysis of TLL and the ten R209 mutants.
Figure 2Optimal reaction temperature of TLL and ten R209 mutants. (a) R209 mutants with increased optimal reaction temperature; (b) R209 mutants revealed with the same optimal reaction temperature.
Figure 3Residual activities of TLL and the ten R209 mutants. The residual activity was tested by incubating all lipases at 70 °C for 90 min. R209 mutants with one star indicate the differences of residual activity are significant at the 0.05 level.
Figure 4Melting temperatures (Tm) of TLL and ten R209 mutants. R209 mutants with two and three stars indicate the differences in Tm values are significant at the 0.01 and 0.001 levels, respectively.
Kinetics of TLL and the ten R209 mutants.
| Enzymes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TLL | 297.36 ± 18.76 | 0.16 ± 0.03 | 850.09 ± 11.84 | 5313.06 ± 74.02 |
| R209A | 384.35 ± 19.28 | 0.23 ± 0.03 * | 1220.16 ± 42.96 | 5305.04 ± 186.77 |
| R209E | 300.52 ± 15.84 | 0.14 ± 0.02 | 1230.63 ± 27.58 | 8790.21 ± 197.02 *** |
| R209H | 330.01 ± 17.77 | 0.18 ± 0.02 | 790.25 ± 22.66 | 4390.28 ± 125.89 *** |
| R209K | 345.37 ± 18.78 | 0.17 ± 0.02 | 1096.41 ± 14.02 | 6499.47 ± 82.49 *** |
| R209M | 319.30 ± 18.57 | 0.19 ± 0.03 | 764.61 ± 17.56 | 4024.26 ± 92.42 *** |
| R209P | 338.70 ± 16.52 | 0.16 ± 0.02 | 1386.98 ± 12.85 | 8668.63 ± 80.34 *** |
| R209T | 343.89 ± 22.43 | 0.19 ± 0.03 | 1091.71 ± 27.64 | 5745.84 ± 145.51 |
| R209I | 302.90 ± 13.22 | 0.18 ± 0.02 | 767.22 ± 22.81 | 4262.33 ± 126.74 *** |
| R209Q | 354.42 ± 20.54 | 0.23 ± 0.03 * | 787.60 ± 7.98 | 3424.34 ± 34.69 *** |
| R209V | 259.78 ± 15.75 | 0.14 ± 0.02 | 712.70 ± 8.11 | 5090.71 ± 57.88 |
*/*** R209 mutants with one and three stars indicate the differences of Km or kcat/Km values are significant at the 0.05 and 0.001 levels, respectively.
Figure 5RMSF and hydrogen bonding interpretation of TLL and three R209 mutants. (a) Illustrates the root mean square fluctuation (RMSF) of TLL and the three R209 mutants during the simulations; (b) displays the hydrogen bond forming probability between H198 and N247 in the TLL and three R209 mutants during the entire simulations; (c) shows the structures of TLL, R209H, R209M, and R209I, respectively. Hydrogen bonding interaction and salt bridge interaction were labeled in yellow dash lines, residue 209 was labeled in red, and its carbon atoms are colored in salmon.
Figure 6Structural modeling of R209 mutants and active site illustration of TLL. (a–d) Show the structures of R209A, R209V, R209E, and R209K, respectively; (e) displays the hydrogen bonding between D201 in the catalytic triad and nearby residues; (f) shows the relative position of the 250-loop, active site, and the lid domain of the TLL. Hydrogen bonding interaction and salt bridge interaction were labeled in yellow dash lines, residue 209 was labeled in red and its carbon atoms are colored in salmon.