| Literature DB >> 36011800 |
Wangqin Bi1, Xinyi Jiang1, Huijun Li2, Yingyi Cheng1, Xingxing Jia1, Yuheng Mao1, Bing Zhao1.
Abstract
This study explores how windows with a green view might affect the mental health (i.e., depressive/anxiety symptoms) of home-isolated populations. An online survey was conducted among 508 adults isolated under government quarantine policies for COVID-19 emergency pandemic control between 10 and 20 January 2022 in Xi'an, China. Structural equation modeling was employed to identify the pathways from green view through windows to isolated people's depressive/anxiety symptoms. The relative frequency of plant/water exposure through windows was associated with fewer depressive/anxiety symptoms. Home-isolated people during COVID-19 reported better mental health when they were exposed to more natural settings. These findings could inspire public health authorities to adopt nature-based solutions to mitigate the adverse mental health consequences of isolated populations during the pandemic.Entities:
Keywords: China; anxiety; depression; green view; lockdown; public health; window view
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36011800 PMCID: PMC9408338 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191610165
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Figure 1Conceptual framework of green view through a window: Depression and Anxiety. Note: Line widths represent the hypothesized pathway strength, with thicker lines denoting potentially stronger associations.
Questionnaire description.
| Dimensions | Questionnaire | Literature for |
|---|---|---|
| Green view | How much greenspace (plants/water) can you see through the window of your house during lockdown periods? | |
| How many times a day do you usually view the greenspace through a window on average during lockdown periods? | Li, H.; Zhang, X.; You, C.; Chen, X.; Cao, Y.; Zhang, G. Can viewing nature through windows improve isolated living? A pathway analysis on Chinese male prisoners during the COVID-19 epidemic. | |
| How long do you usually view the greenspace through the window on average during lockdown periods? | ||
| Life satisfaction | I am satisfied with my current life during lockdown periods. | Lehberger, M.; Kleih, A.; Sparke, K. Self-reported well-being and the importance of green spaces–A comparison of garden owners and non-garden owners in times of COVID-19. |
| Loneliness | I often feel lonely during lockdown periods. | Astell-Burt, T.; Hartig, T.; Eckermann, S.; Nieuwenhuijsen, M.; McMunn, A.; Frumkin, H.; Feng, X. More green, less lonely? A longitudinal cohort study. |
| Restoration quality of green view through window | Being away: Looking out the window at home gives me a break from my day-to-day routine and I can get away from the things that usually demand my attention. | Dzhambov, A.M.; Lercher, P.; Browning, M.H.E.M.; Stoyanov, D.; Petrova, N.; Novakov, S.; Dimitrova, D.D. Does greenery experienced indoors and outdoors provide an escape and support mental health during the COVID-19 quarantine? |
| Compatibility: Looking out the window at home, I could find ways to enjoy myself in a place like this. | Hartig, T.; Korpela, K.; Evans, G.W.; Gärling, T. A measure of restorative quality in environments. |
Participant characteristics (N = 508).
| Characteristics | N | Category | Percentage | Mean (SD) | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Age (yrs) | 241 | 18–25 | 47.40% | ||
| 190 | 26–35 | 37.40% | |||
| 50 | 36–45 | 9.80% | |||
| 23 | 46–55 | 4.50% | |||
| 3 | 56–65 | 0.60% | |||
| 1 | >65 | 0.20% | |||
| Sex | 308 | female | 61% | ||
| Education | 378 | university and above | 74.40% | ||
| Income (million yuan) | 247 | 10–20 | 48.60% | ||
|
| |||||
| Depression (PHQ-2) | 508 | 2.18 (1.27) | 0–6 | ||
| Anxiety (GAD-2) | 508 | 2.16 (1.35) | 0–6 | ||
|
| |||||
| Green view | 45 | seldom | 8.90% | ||
| 85 | few | 16.70% | |||
| 159 | a bit | 31.30% | |||
| 169 | some | 33.30% | |||
| 50 | a lot | 9.80% | |||
| Frequency (time) | 1 | 0 | 0.20% | ||
| 72 | 1–2 | 14.20% | |||
| 152 | 3–5 | 29.90% | |||
| 138 | 5–7 | 27.20% | |||
| 145 | >7 | 28.50% | |||
| Duration (min) | 68 | <1 | 13.40% | ||
| 110 | 1–3 | 21.70% | |||
| 133 | 3–5 | 26.20% | |||
| 106 | 5–10 | 20.90% | |||
| 91 | >10 | 17.90% | |||
|
| |||||
| Being away | 508 | 6.75 (2.12) | 0–10 | ||
| Compatibility | 508 | 7.00 (2.10) | 0–10 | ||
| Life satisfaction | 508 | 5.83 (2.18) | 0–10 | ||
| Loneliness | 508 | 4.19 (1.75) | 1–7 |
Note: PHQ-2 = Patient Health Questionnaire-2; GAD-2 = General Anxiety Disorder-2; SD = standard deviation.
Spearman’s correlation analysis for the measured parameters.
| Variable | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Green view | 1 | ||||||||
| 2. Frequency | 0.226 ** | 1 | |||||||
| 3. Duration | 0.155 ** | 0.333 ** | 1 | ||||||
| 4. Life satisfaction | 0.202 ** | −0.010 | 0.054 | 1 | |||||
| 5. Loneliness | −0.126 ** | 0.106 * | 0.114 * | −0.283 ** | 1 | ||||
| 6. Being away | 0.334 ** | 0.259 ** | 0.209 ** | 0.236 ** | 0.012 | 1 | |||
| 7. Compatibility | 0.337 ** | 0.243 ** | 0.212 ** | 0.306 ** | 0.023 | 0.652 ** | 1 | ||
| 8. Anxiety | −0.047 | 0.069 | 0.095 * | −0.301 ** | 0.392 ** | −0.036 | −0.083 | 1 | |
| 9. Depression | −0.147 ** | −0.043 | −0.008 | −0.282 ** | 0.413 ** | −0.119 ** | −0.137 ** | 0.693 ** | 1 |
Note: Numbers in the cells indicate Spearman’s ρ; * statistically significant at p < 0.05 (two-tailed); ** statistically significant at p < 0.01 (two-tailed).
Figure 2The final SEM model 1 demonstrates standardized effects between variables. Note: The solid black lines indicate p < 0.001, and the gray dotted lines indicate p > 0.05.
Effects of green view and mediators on depression in the structural equation model.
| Parameters | SE | Estimate | Bias-Corrected Percentile Method | Percentile Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | Lower | Upper | |||
|
| ||||||
| Green view | 0.028 | −0.070 | −0.130 | −0.019 | −0.130 | −0.019 |
| Duration | 0.006 | −0.006 | −0.020 | 0.005 | −0.020 | 0.005 |
| Frequency | 0.013 | 0.017 | −0.007 | 0.047 | −0.009 | 0.044 |
| Bing away | 0.015 | −0.044 | −0.075 | −0.015 | −0.077 | −0.016 |
| Compatibility | 0.004 | −0.010 | −0.020 | −0.004 | −0.019 | −0.003 |
| Loneliness | 0.016 | 0.138 | 0.107 | 0.170 | 0.107 | 0.170 |
| Life satisfaction | 0.013 | −0.043 | −0.070 | −0.017 | −0.068 | −0.015 |
|
| ||||||
| Green view→Frequency→Being away→Depression | 0.002 | −0.002 | −0.006 | −0.004 | −0.006 | −0.001 |
| Green view→Frequency→Loneliness→Depression | 0.002 | 0.005 | 0.002 | 0.012 | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Green view→Frequency→Loneliness→Life satisfaction→Depression | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Green view→Duration→Being away→Depression | 0.001 | −0.001 | −0.004 | −0.001 | −0.004 | −0.001 |
| Green view→Being away→Depression | 0.008 | −0.020 | −0.040 | −0.004 | −0.040 | −0.005 |
| Green view→Compatibility→Life satisfaction→Depression | 0.001 | −0.002 | −0.005 | −0.001 | −0.005 | −0.001 |
| Green view→Loneliness→Depression | 0.010 | −0.030 | −0.053 | −0.010 | −0.052 | −0.010 |
| Green view→Loneliness→Life satisfaction→Depression | 0.002 | −0.004 | −0.009 | −0.001 | −0.007 | −0.008 |
Note: Coefficients are unstandardized linear regression coefficients. SE = bootstrap standard errors.