| Literature DB >> 36009387 |
Subin Surendran1, Usama Aboelkheir1, Andrew A Tu1, William J Magner1, S Lynn Sigurdson1, Mihai Merzianu2, Wesley L Hicks1, Amritha Suresh1,3, Keith L Kirkwood4, Moni A Kuriakose1,3.
Abstract
The immune cell niche associated with oral dysplastic lesion progression to carcinoma is poorly understood. We identified T regulatory cells (Treg), CD8+ effector T cells (Teff) and immune checkpoint molecules across oral dysplastic stages of oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMD). OPMD and oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) tissue sections (N = 270) were analyzed by immunohistochemistry for Treg (CD4, CD25 and FoxP3), Teff (CD8) and immune checkpoint molecules (PD-1 and PD-L1). The Treg marker staining intensity correlated significantly (p < 0.01) with presence of higher dysplasia grade and invasive cancer. These data suggest that Treg infiltration is relatively early in dysplasia and may be associated with disease progression. The presence of CD8+ effector T cells and the immune checkpoint markers PD-1 and PD-L1 were also associated with oral cancer progression (p < 0.01). These observations indicate the induction of an adaptive immune response with similar Treg and Teff recruitment timing and, potentially, the early induction of exhaustion. FoxP3 and PD-L1 levels were closely correlated with CD8 levels (p < 0.01). These data indicate the presence of reinforcing mechanisms contributing to the immune suppressive niche in high-risk OPMD and in OSCC. The presence of an adaptive immune response and T-cell exhaustion suggest that an effective immune response may be reactivated with targeted interventions coupled with immune checkpoint inhibition.Entities:
Keywords: immune cell infiltration; immune checkpoint; immunotherapy; oncogenesis; oral cancer; oral potentially malignant disorders; tumor microenvironment; tumorigenesis
Year: 2022 PMID: 36009387 PMCID: PMC9404942 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10081840
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomedicines ISSN: 2227-9059
Patient demographics.
| Characteristic | Cases | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Sex | ||
| Male | 71 | 55.5% |
| Female | 57 | 45.5% |
|
| ||
| 28–50 | 30 | 23.4% |
| 51–60 | 40 | 31.3% |
| 61–70 | 35 | 27.3% |
| 71+ | 23 | 18.0% |
|
| ||
| White | 116 | 90.6% |
| Black | 6 | 4.7% |
| Asian | 3 | 2.3% |
| American Indian or Alaskan Native | 1 | 0.8% |
| Hispanic | 1 | 0.8% |
| Other | 1 | 0.8% |
|
| ||
| Yes | 82 | 64.1% |
| No | 45 | 35.9% |
|
| 128 | 100% |
|
|
Pathology distribution of samples.
|
|
|
|
| Normal | 87 | 32.2% |
| Hyperplasia/Parakeratosis | 45 | 16.7% |
| Mild Dysplasia | 69 | 25.6% |
| Moderate Dysplasia | 22 | 8.1% |
| Severe Dysplasia/Carcinoma in situ | 13 | 4.8% |
| Carcinoma | 34 | 12.6% |
|
|
|
Figure 1Infiltrating lymphocytes and immune checkpoint expression levels increase in parallel with oral cancer progression. Immunohistochemical analysis of immune markers in patient clinical samples pathologically defined as normal mucosa, pro-gressive grades of dysplasia (mild, moderate, and severe dysplasia) and carcinoma. Representative images are shown at total magnification 400(×) (scale bar, 100 µm). Average IHC staining for each immune marker was calculated and correlated with pa-thology (ordinal scale). The Y-axis in the graph indicates the IHC score and the X-axis indicates the pathological distribution of patient cohorts 1-normal, 2- parakeratosis (images not shown), 3-mild dysplasia, 4-moderate dysplasia, 5-severe dysplasia and 6-carcinoma. Pathology cohorts whose IHC staining value is significantly different from the normal group are indicated (*, p < 0.05).
T cell, checkpoint molecule and chemokine quantitation in oral potentially malignant and malignant lesions.
| Pathology | CD25 | CD4 | FoxP3 | CD8 | PD-L1 | PD-1 | CXCR4 ^ | CXCL12 ^ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | Mean # | 15.6 | 17.0 | 39.3 | 25.2 | 34.3 | 32.0 | 2.7 | 115.0 |
| SEM | 1.7 | 1.6 | 3.5 | 1.9 | 5.3 | 5.3 | 0.3 | 6.6 | |
| Parakeratosis | Mean | 31.4 | 32.0 | 54.4 | 37.0 | 36.4 | 25.5 | 2.3 | 112.8 |
| SEM | 6.7 | 5.1 | 6.8 | 4.0 | 7.7 | 6.0 | 0.4 | 10.2 | |
| Mild dysplasia | Mean | 28.5 | 31.0 | 43.0 | 26.0 | 39.0 | 38.6 | 3.2 | 127.7 |
| SEM | 3.8 | 2.7 | 4.0 | 2.1 | 4.6 | 4.5 | 0.3 | 6.9 | |
| Moderate dysplasia | Mean | 83.3 | 92.3 | 72.2 | 41.6 | 82.1 | 97.0 | 3.4 | 93.6 |
| SEM | 11.0 | 11.8 | 12.8 | 5.5 | 13.8 | 14.7 | 0.7 | 22.7 | |
| Severe dysplasia | Mean | 114.1 | 129.1 | 101.1 | 69.5 | 127.3 | 112.5 | 5.0 | 198.1 |
| SEM | 12.8 | 13.2 | 12.8 | 7.9 | 17.0 | 20.6 | 1.0 | 20.4 | |
| Carcinoma | Mean | 103.2 | 109.4 | 120.4 | 65.1 | 134.3 | 139.3 | 5.0 | 153.5 |
| SEM | 9.6 | 8.7 | 6.3 | 5.8 | 14.1 | 16.2 | 0.7 | 16.4 |
^, Published data [10]; #, average number of positively stained cells/hpf (CD25, CD4, FoxP3, CD8, PD-1, CXCR4), average Histoscore/hpf (PD-L1, CXCL12); and SEM, Standard Error of the Mean.
Correlations between pathology and IHC assessments.
| Pathology | CD25 | CD4 | FoxP3 | CD8 | PD-L1 | PD-1 | CXCR4 ^ | CXCL12 ^ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pathology | 1.00 | ||||||||
| CD25 |
| 1.00 | |||||||
| CD4 |
|
| 1.00 | ||||||
| FoxP3 |
|
|
| 1.00 | |||||
| CD8 |
|
|
|
| 1.00 | ||||
| PD-L1 |
|
|
|
|
| 1.00 | |||
| PD-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 1.00 | ||
| CXCR4 ^ | 0.27 | 0.17 # | 0.23 | 0.14 | 0.22 | 0.35 | 0.19 # | 1.00 | |
| CXCL12^ | 0.20 | 0.14 # | 0.17 | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.32 | 0.29 | 0.32 | 1.00 |
IHC vs. pathology (scored on an ordinal scale) associations are presented as Spearman correlation coefficients whereas correlations between markers are presented as Pearson correlation coefficients. bold, p < 0.01; #, p < 0.05; and ^ published IHC data re-analyzed in the context of new data presented here [10].
Figure 2Survival analysis based on Treg surrogate markers. (A), Kaplan–Meier analysis of OPMD/OSCC patients stratified by first vs. fourth quartile of CD25 staining. The red line represents the highest quartile CD25 detected, and the blue line represents the lowest quartile of CD25 detection. The survival difference did not reach statistical significance—Mantel–Cox Log Rank test p = 0.092. (B) Kaplan–Meier analysis of OPMD/OSCC patients stratified by first vs. fourth quartile of FoxP3 staining. The red line represents the highest quartile FoxP3 detected, and the blue line represents the lowest quartile of FoxP3 detection. The survival difference did not reach statistical significance—Mantel–Cox Log Rank test p = 0.063.