| Literature DB >> 36009278 |
Vaida Sirgedaitė-Šėžienė1, Ieva Lučinskaitė1, Vida Mildažienė2, Anatolii Ivankov2, Kazunori Koga3,4, Masaharu Shiratani3, Kristina Laužikė5, Virgilijus Baliuckas1.
Abstract
In order to ensure sufficient food resources for a constantly growing human population, new technologies (e.g., cold plasma technologies) are being developed for increasing the germination and seedling growth without negative effects on the environment. Pinaceae species are considered a natural source of antioxidant compounds and are valued for their pharmaceutical and nutraceutical properties. In this study, the seeds of seven different Norway spruce half-sib families were processed for one or two minutes with cold plasma (CP) using dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) plasma equipment. At the end of the second vegetation season, the total flavonoid content (TFC), DPPH (2,2- diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl-hydrate), and ABTS (2,2'-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)) antioxidant activity, and the amounts of six organic acids (folic, malic, citric, oxalic, succinic, and ascorbic) were determined in the needles of different half-sib families of Norway spruce seedlings. The results show that the TFC, antioxidant activity, and amounts of organic acids in the seedling needles depended on both the treatment duration and the genetic family. The strongest positive effect on the TFC was determined in the seedlings of the 477, 599, and 541 half-sib families after seed treatment with CP for 1 min (CP1). The TFC in these families increased from 118.06 mg g-1 to 312.6 mg g-1 compared to the control. Moreover, seed treatment with CP1 resulted in the strongest increase in the antioxidant activity of the needles of the 541 half-sib family seedlings; the antioxidant activity, determined by DPPH and ABTS tests, increased by 30 and 23%, respectively, compared to the control. The obtained results indicate that the CP effect on the amount of organic acids in the needles was dependent on the half-sib family. It was determined that treatment with CP1 increased the amount of five organic acids in the needles of the 541 half-sib family seedlings. The presented results show future possibilities for using cold plasma seed treatment in the food and pharmacy industries.Entities:
Keywords: Norway spruce; antiradical assays; flavonoids; food additives; genetic selection; health; low-temperature plasma; natural extracts; organic acids; secondary metabolites
Year: 2022 PMID: 36009278 PMCID: PMC9405162 DOI: 10.3390/antiox11081558
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3921
Total number (n) of Norway spruce samples.
| Flavonoids and | 7 half-sib families × 3 different treatment | 3 biological | n = 63 |
| Organic acids | 7 half-sib families × 3 different treatment | 1 biological | n = 21 |
Figure 1PCA biplot of the first and second components for the antioxidant compounds and amount of organic acids (on half-sib family mean level). Treatments: 1—seed treatment with cold plasma 2 min (CP2); 2—seed treatment with cold plasma 1 min (CP1); 3—control group. The family number is shown next to the circle.
Contribution of the traits (%) to the 1st and 2nd components.
| Trait | 1st Component | 2nd Component |
|---|---|---|
| Flavonoids | 14.63 | 16.92 |
| DPPH | 8.48 | 14.99 |
| ABTS | 14.00 | 19.09 |
| Oxalic | 0.07 | 0.31 |
| Malic | 21.90 | 6.19 |
| Ascorbic | 4.67 | 16.31 |
| Folic | 9.38 | 14.30 |
| Citric | 0.01 | 7.19 |
| Succinic | 26.86 | 4.70 |
Figure 2Total flavonoid content in the needle extracts of Norway spruce seedlings growing from control and treated seeds. C – control, CP1 – seeds treated with cold plasma 1 min., CP2 – seeds treated with cold plasma 2 min. The average ± SE (n = 63). The asterisks indicate the statistical significance of the difference between the treated group and the control in each half-sib family (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01).
Figure 3Antioxidant activity in the needle extracts of Norway spruce seedlings growing from control and treated seeds detected by DPPH and ABTS methods. C—control; CP1—seeds treated with cold plasma 1 min; CP2—seeds treated with cold plasma 2 min. The average ± SE (n = 63). The asterisks indicate the statistical significance of the difference between the treated group and the control in each half-sib family (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001).
Figure 4Amount of organic acids – ascorbic acid (a), folic acid (b) and oxalic acid (c) in the needle extracts of Norway spruce seedlings growing from control and treated seeds. C – control, CP1 – seed treatment with cold plasma 1 min., CP2 – seed treatment with cold plasma 2 min. The average ± SE (n = 21). The asterisks indicate the statistical significance of the difference between the treated group and the control in each half-sib family (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001).
Figure 5Amount of organic acids – citric acid (a), succinic acid (b) and malic acid (c) in the needle extracts of Norway spruce seedlings growing from control and treated seeds. C – control, CP1 – seeds treated with cold plasma 1 min., CP2 – seeds treated with cold plasma 2 min. The average ± SE (n = 21). The asterisks indicate the statistical significance of the difference between the treated group and the control in each half-sib family (* p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001).
Pairwise comparison between the treated seeds of Norway spruce half-sib families and the control. Sample size for organic acids: n = 21; the rest: n = 63.
| Trait | Compared Variants | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Flavonoids | CP1 vs. control | 0.41 | 0.6802 |
| CP2 vs. control | −1.25 | 0.2150 | |
| CP1 vs. CP2 | 1.86 | 0.0654 | |
| DPPH | CP1 vs. control | 4.55 | <0.0001 |
| CP2 vs. control | −0.85 | 0.3959 | |
| CP1 vs. CP2 | 4.58 | <0.0001 | |
| ABTS | CP1 vs. control | −0.28 | 0.7824 |
| CP2 vs. control | −4.28 | <0.0001 | |
| CP1 vs. CP2 | 4.27 | <0.0001 | |
| Oxalic | CP1 vs. control | 2.17 | 0.0364 |
| CP2 vs. control | 0.87 | 0.3923 | |
| CP1 vs. CP2 | 0.84 | 0.4043 | |
| Malic | CP1 vs. control | 1.42 | 0.1644 |
| CP2 vs. control | −0.38 | 0.7025 | |
| CP1 vs. CP2 | 1.68 | 0.1037 | |
| Ascorbic | CP1 vs. control | 6.37 | <0.0001 |
| CP2 vs. control | 3.34 | 0.0026 | |
| CP1 vs. CP2 | 1.82 | 0.0766 | |
| Folic | CP1 vs. control | 0.71 | 0.4840 |
| CP2 vs. control | 0.81 | 0.4234 | |
| CP1 vs. CP2 | −0.04 | 0.9710 | |
| Citric | CP1 vs. control | 1.59 | 0.1200 |
| CP2 vs. control | 0.46 | 0.6476 | |
| CP1 vs. CP2 | 1.13 | 0.2636 | |
| Succinic | CP1 vs. control | 3.09 | 0.0052 |
| CP2 vs. control | 1.08 | 0.2873 | |
| CP1 vs. CP2 | 2.69 | 0.0131 |