| Literature DB >> 28713417 |
Andrea Ganthaler1,2, Wolfgang Stöggl1, Ilse Kranner1, Stefan Mayr1.
Abstract
Secondary phenolic metabolites are involved in plant responses to various biotic stress factors, and are apparently important for the defense against fungal pathogens. In this study, we investigated their role in defense against the rust Chrysomyxa rhododendri in Norway spruce. The fungal pathogen undergoes a seasonal lifecycle with host shift; after overwintering in rhododendron shrubs, it attacks the sprouting current-year spruce needles and causes needle fall in autumn. Repeated infections lead to reduced timber yield and severe problems with rejuvenation in subalpine Norway spruce forests. Trees with varying susceptibility to infection by C. rhododendri were selected and foliar phenolic composition was assessed using UHPLC-MS. We report on seasonal accumulation patterns and infection-related changes in the concentrations of 16 metabolites, including flavonoids, stilbenes, simple phenylpropanoids and the precursor shikimic acid, and their correlation with the infection degree of the tree. We found significant variation in the phenolic profiles during needle development: flavonoids were predominant in the first weeks after sprouting, whereas stilbenes, picein and shikimic acid increased during the first year. Following infection, several flavonoids and resveratrol increased up to 1.8 fold in concentration, whereas picein and shikimic acid were reduced by about 70 and 60%, respectively. The constitutive and early stage infection-induced concentrations of kaempferol, quercetin and taxifolin as well as the late stage infection-induced concentrations of stilbenes and picein were negatively correlated with infection degree. We conclude that a combination of constitutive and inducible accumulation of phenolic compounds is associated with the lower susceptibility of individual trees to C. rhododendri. The potentially fungicidal flavonoid aglycones may limit hyphal growth and prevent development of infection symptoms, and high levels of stilbenes may impede the infection of older needles. The presented results underline a highly compound-specific seasonal accumulation and defense response of Norway spruce and may facilitate the selection of promising trees for breeding programs.Entities:
Keywords: Picea abies; conifers; flavonoids; pathogen resistance; pathogenic fungus; stilbenes
Year: 2017 PMID: 28713417 PMCID: PMC5492020 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01173
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Figure 1Norway spruce twigs with infection symptoms. Twigs from three trees with varying susceptibility to C. rhododendri were harvested in August. Note that only current-year-needles are affected, whereas reduced needle density in previous-year branch sections indicate past infections.
Secondary metabolites and internal standards analyzed.
| Stilbene | 244.24 | 1 (R = H) | ||
| Stilbene | 406.38 | 1 (R = glucose) | ||
| Stilbene | 228.24 | 2 (R = H) | ||
| Stilbene | 390.38 | 2 (R = glucose) | ||
| Stilbene | 420.41 | 3 (R = glucose) | ||
| Picein | Phenylpr. | 298.29 | 4 (R = glucose) | |
| Shikimic acid | Cyclitol | 174.15 | 5 | |
| Kaempferol | Flavonoid | 286.23 | 6 (R1,2 = H) | |
| Kaempferol 3-glucoside | Flavonoid | 448.38 | 6 (R2 = glucose) | |
| Kaempferol 7-glucoside | Flavonoid | 448.38 | 6 (R1 = glucose) | |
| Kaempferol 3-rutinoside | Flavonoid | 594.52 | 6 (R2 = rutinose) | |
| Quercetin | Flavonoid | 302.24 | 7 (R = H) | |
| Quercetin 3-glucoside | Flavonoid | 464.38 | 7 (R = glucose) | |
| Taxifolin | Flavonoid | 304.25 | 8 | |
| Gallocatechin | Flavonoid | 306.27 | 9 | |
| Catechin | Flavonoid | 290.27 | 10 | |
| Naringin | Flavonoid | 580.53 | ||
| Orientin | Flavonoid | 448.38 | ||
| Pinosylvin | Stilbene | 212.24 | ||
Compound name, compound class, molecular weight (MW), and skeletal structure are given.
Infection degree of analyzed trees for the years 2011–2015 (percentage of infected needles in each needle age group) and mean infection degree.
| RIN-A | Rinn Kriegerkapelle | 14.1 | 100 | 90 | 20 | 90 | 80 | 76.0 ± 12.8 |
| RIN-B | 13.1 | 30 | 90 | 30 | 50 | 80 | 56.0 ± 11.2 | |
| RIN-C | 14.3 | 60 | 90 | 50 | 80 | 85 | 73.0 ± 6.9 | |
| RIN-D | Rinn Fluchtalweg | 8.5 | 90 | 90 | 40 | 40 | 90 | 70.0 ± 11.0 |
| RIN-E | 10.2 | 90 | 80 | 90 | 50 | 90 | 80.0 ± 6.9 | |
| RIN-F | 13.2 | 80 | 80 | 60 | 30 | 40 | 58.0 ± 9.1 | |
| PRA-A | Praxmar | 10.3 | 90 | 80 | 60 | 90 | 90 | 82.0 ± 5.2 |
| PRA-B | 6.3 | 100 | 60 | 60 | 70 | 90 | 76.0 ± 7.3 | |
| PRA-C | 9.8 | 100 | 40 | 40 | 70 | 90 | 68.0 ± 11.1 | |
| PRA-R | Praxmar | 16.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0.4 ± 0.4 |
Figure 2Accumulation of phenolic needle compounds during needle development in healthy needles (black symbols, mean ± SE, n = 9) and infected needles (gray symbols, mean ± SE, n = 9) from the end of May to the end of September, and in previous-year needles. All values are given as μmol g−1 dry weight, and significant differences between healthy and infected needles are marked with an asterisk. Accumulation patterns of the sum of total stilbenes and flavonoids and of the tree PRA-R are shown in Supplementary Figures S1, S2.
Comparison of phenolic concentrations in the tree PRA-R with mean values of the more susceptible trees for constitutive levels at the beginning of July, and infection-induced concentration changes in mid-July and August.
| 0.50 ± 0.14 | 0.21 | 0.36 | −1.02 ± 0.40 | −0.07 | −6.72 ± 2.55 | ||||
| 0.14 ± 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.32 | −0.55 ± 0.18 | −0.17 | 0.03 | −1.05 ± 0.37 | |||
| 0.01 ± 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.25 | −0.02 ± 0.02 | −0.59 | −0.01 ± 0.08 | ||||
| 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.01 | −0.36 | −0.11 ± 0.04 | +0.12 ± 0.06 | −0.43 | ||||
| 0.01 ± 0.00 | 0.01 | −0.29 | −0.01 ± 0.01 | +0.06 ± 0.02 | −0.25 | ||||
| Kaempferol 3-glucoside | 3.46 ± 0.85 | −0.57 | +0.70 ± 0.11 | 0.25 | +0.44 ± 0.06 | 0.45 | |||
| Kaempferol 7-glucoside | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.10 | −0.45 | +0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.11 | +0.01 ± 0.01 | −0.00 | 0.41 |
| Kaempferol 3-rutinoside | 0.67 ± 0.10 | −0.40 | −0.03 ± 0.03 | 0.00 | −0.36 | −0.03 ± 0.02 | −0.19 | ||
| Kaempferol | 1.14 ± 0.55 | −0.00 ± 0.01 | +0.06 ± 0.01 | +0.07 | −0.08 | ||||
| Quercetin 3-glucoside | 1.67 ± 0.31 | 2.26 | −0.41 | +0.30 ± 0.08 | 0.12 | +0.18 ± 0.04 | +0.09 | 0.24 | |
| Quercetin | 0.19 ± 0.07 | −0.00 ± 0.00 | +0.01 ± 0.00 | +0.02 | −0.19 | ||||
| Taxifolin | 0.08 ± 0.01 | −0.07 ± 0.06 | +0.27 ± 0.06 | 0.00 | |||||
| Gallocatechin | 3.49 ± 0.34 | 0.30 | +0.67 ± 0.23 | +0.76 | 0.35 | −0.11 ± 0.30 | −0.18 | ||
| Catechin | 13.88 ± 1.14 | 15.01 | −0.26 | +2.88 ± 2.14 | −0.18 | +3.88 ± 1.71 | −0.18 | ||
| Picein | 1.88 ± 0.44 | 0.14 | −4.36 ± 1.19 | −3.27 | 0.52 | −25.63 ± 6.89 | |||
| Shikimic acid | 99.76 ± 4.00 | 0.45 | −59.79 ± 4.77 | 0.27 | −149.57 ± 13.70 | −0.59 | |||
Infection-induced concentration changes (Inf.-ind. conc. changes) reflect the deviation of compound levels in infected needles from concentrations in healthy needles of the same tree and sampling date (for details see Section Materials and Methods). Also given are the Pearson-correlation-coefficients between compound concentrations and the mean infection degree including all trees (n = 10). Concentrations of the tree PRA-R outside the confidence interval of the analyzed population and significant correlations (p ≤ 0.05) are marked in bold.