| Literature DB >> 36008231 |
Florian Stoeckel1, Sabrina Stöckli2, Joseph Phillips3, Benjamin Lyons4, Vittorio Mérola5, Matthew Barnfield6, Paula Szewach6, Jack Thompson6, Jason Reifler6.
Abstract
During theCOVID-19pandemic,manycountries implementedrestrictionsto limit the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus (e.g. travel restrictions and lockdowns).One path to loosening restrictions is to do so selectively only for vaccinated individuals (e.g. by implementing vaccine passports domestically or as a prerequisite for international travel).Setting different rules based on people's vaccination statusis howevera contentious issue among health policy experts, government officials, and the public. Our analysis focuses on the levels and correlates of public support for the lifting of restrictions for the vaccinatedin April 2021, i.e. at a time when restrictions were in place and aselective lifting of these restrictions just for the vaccinatedwas debated in Europe.We use representative quota samples of the populations of France (N = 1,752), Germany (N = 1,759), and Sweden (N = 1,754). We find that a slight plurality support lifting restrictions for the vaccinated in France and Germany but not in Sweden. Vaccine hesitancy emerges as strong predictor of opposition to such a policy. Additionally, individuals who are already vaccinated (in France and Germany) and who are higher in risk-seeking express more support for the lifting of restrictions for the vaccinated. We discuss implications for the debate on vaccine passports.Entities:
Keywords: Covid-19; Lifting restrictions; Public health; Public opinion; Vaccination; Vaccine hesitancy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36008231 PMCID: PMC9385771 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.08.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vaccine ISSN: 0264-410X Impact factor: 4.169