| Literature DB >> 36008075 |
Ting Liu1, Min Xu1,2, Menghua Ye2, Yue Pan1, Nafei Xu3, Xiaoxue Tan2, Qiuhua Sun4.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The organisational silence of nursing teams has received increasing attention from managers. Chinese nurses have a relatively high score for organisational silence, and male nurses score higher than female nurses. Lack of professional empathy, high pressure in the work environment, and traditional Chinese cultural factors suggest that Chinese male nurses' experiences of and reasons for organisational silence are complex and unique. Taking male nurses in the emergency department as an example, this study explores the experience and meaning of male nurses' organisational silence and provides ideas for nursing managers to understand the silence of male nurses. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: An interpretative phenomenological approach underpins the study design. In this study, the purposive sampling method will be used to select male nurses who meet the inclusion criteria with maximum differentiation as a strategy. Face-to-face semistructured interviews and Van Manen analysis methods will be used for data collection and analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (ethical approval ID: 2019-KL-036-01). Participants will provide informed consent, will be able to withdraw at any time and will have their contributions kept confidential. The findings of the study will be shared with relevant stakeholders and disseminated in conference presentations and journal publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100047057). © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.Entities:
Keywords: HEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATION & MANAGEMENT; Health & safety; Human resource management; Organisation of health services
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36008075 PMCID: PMC9422853 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058557
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open ISSN: 2044-6055 Impact factor: 3.006