We report a supramolecule that contains five spins of two different types and with, crucially, two different and predictable interaction energies between the spins. The supramolecule is characterized, and the interaction energies are demonstrated by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy. Based on the measured parameters, we propose experiments that would allow this designed supramolecule to be used to simulate quantum decoherence in maximally entangled Bell states that could be used in quantum teleportation.
We report a supramolecule that contains five spins of two different types and with, crucially, two different and predictable interaction energies between the spins. The supramolecule is characterized, and the interaction energies are demonstrated by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy. Based on the measured parameters, we propose experiments that would allow this designed supramolecule to be used to simulate quantum decoherence in maximally entangled Bell states that could be used in quantum teleportation.
Molecular electron spins could play a
key role in the development
of coherent nanotechnologies[1] and in the
design of platforms to encode and process quantum information.[2−7] These molecules can be organized on surfaces[8] or integrated with superconducting resonators,[9] the leading technology for solid-state processors. In addition,
they can be coherently addressed by both magnetic[10] and electric field[11] pulses.The crucial advantage of molecular electron spins as qubits is
the ease with which they can be linked to form more complex spin clusters,[12−16] targeted for specific quantum information schemes. For instance,
the synthesis of supramolecular spin trimers allows one to encode
a pair of qubits with a switchable effective qubit–qubit coupling,[17] a crucial step to implement general quantum
computing algorithms in a scalable architecture. Moreover, quantum
error correction[18−20] and quantum simulation[21] schemes can be proposed based on molecular systems. A question remains
whether this advantage compensates for disadvantages such as relatively
short coherence times[22−26] and challenges around addressing the spins.To realize the
advantage, three key steps are needed: first, an
ability to make and characterize complex spin clusters that retain
the identity of the original qubits; second, a proposed and simulated
algorithm that could be performed with the multispin system that would
be impossible with a simpler system; and third, the experiment needs
to be performed. Here, we report taking the first two steps in a five-spin
supramolecule and the simulation of the use of this supramolecular
complex as a quantum simulator of the effect of decoherence on two
qubits prepared in a maximally entangled state.Understanding
the role of decoherence on the dynamics of a quantum
system is of utmost importance both to shed light on fundamental phenomena
(such as photosynthetic processes, thermalization, phase transitions)
and to design more efficient quantum computing platforms. Indeed,
decoherence represents the most important source of errors on any
quantum computing hardware. Entanglement is the quintessential quantum
phenomenon and a crucial resource for quantum information processing.
Hence, by destroying entanglement, decoherence leads to devastating
errors in quantum applications. However, simulating the effect of
decoherence is very hard because it originates from the interaction
of a relatively small subset of qubits with a huge number of environmental
degrees of freedom. The resulting dissipative dynamics on the system
qubits can be computed along different lines[27−34] based in general on adding to the system qubits with additional
qubits modeling a (weak) coupling to the environment. Here, we show
that such a quantum simulation can be performed on a 5-qubit supramolecule
with tailored interactions.The spin cluster we report (Figure ) is based on linking
together {Cr7Ni} rings
that have been long studied as qubits[12,16,17] as they have a ground state with S = 1/2, with reasonable
coherence times.[22] Here, we link the rings
in two distinct ways, producing a supramolecule containing two interaction
energies differing by > an order of magnitude. We characterize
the
system, and we show how to implement a quantum simulation of decoherence,
acting on a pair of entangled qubits (Figure c). This is done by exploiting the two very
different interactions within the molecule: the larger one defines
a core unit of two “system” qubits (given by the Cr7Ni rings), with a switchable interaction provided by the central
Cu (auxiliary qubit exploited as a switch of the effective coupling
between Cr7Ni qubits). The smaller interaction is used
to simulate the weak coupling of the system with the “environment”.
Figure 1
Synthesis
and structure of the five-qubit quantum simulator. (a)
Scheme for syntheses of 2 and 3. (i) CrF3, xs HO2CBu, nickel
carbonate, 160° C, 24 h. (ii) nPrOH, 24 h. (iii)
[Cu(hfac)2(H2O)2], THF/toluene. (b)
Structure of 3 in the crystal; the letters S, Q1, Q2, E1, and E2 identify the role
of the units in the quantum simulator. The colored balls correspond
to different atom types: Cr (green), Cu (dark blue), Ni (lilac), O
(red), N (blue), F (yellow), carbon (silver). Hydrogens and pivalate
groups are omitted for clarity. Inset: full structure of the {Cr7Ni} ring. (c) Scheme of the simulated time evolution of the
entangled state of Q1–Q2. The simulated
interaction (dashed lines) between the system (Q1, Q2, big arrows) and the external or the environment (E1 and E2, clouds) qubits induces decoherence on the system,
thus breaking entanglement (sketched as a cord) in a controlled way
as the time of the quantum simulation goes on.
Synthesis
and structure of the five-qubit quantum simulator. (a)
Scheme for syntheses of 2 and 3. (i) CrF3, xs HO2CBu, nickel
carbonate, 160° C, 24 h. (ii) nPrOH, 24 h. (iii)
[Cu(hfac)2(H2O)2], THF/toluene. (b)
Structure of 3 in the crystal; the letters S, Q1, Q2, E1, and E2 identify the role
of the units in the quantum simulator. The colored balls correspond
to different atom types: Cr (green), Cu (dark blue), Ni (lilac), O
(red), N (blue), F (yellow), carbon (silver). Hydrogens and pivalate
groups are omitted for clarity. Inset: full structure of the {Cr7Ni} ring. (c) Scheme of the simulated time evolution of the
entangled state of Q1–Q2. The simulated
interaction (dashed lines) between the system (Q1, Q2, big arrows) and the external or the environment (E1 and E2, clouds) qubits induces decoherence on the system,
thus breaking entanglement (sketched as a cord) in a controlled way
as the time of the quantum simulation goes on.As a case study, we prepare the system in a Bell
state, i.e., a
maximally entangled two-qubit state used, for instance, in quantum
teleportation (QT). Indeed, the success of QT is based on the entanglement
between the qubits shared by the two parties involved in the teleportation.
Hence, we compute the failure probability of the QT protocol as a
measure of the break of entanglement induced by decoherence.We perform thorough numerical simulations of the whole algorithm,
based on experimental parameters, finding a very good agreement with
expected results. This shows that the present supramolecular system
could form the building block of a quantum simulator, capable of mimicking
the dynamics of an open quantum system.
Results and Discussion
Synthesis and Structural Characterization
We have previously
linked {Cr7Ni} rings in two ways. The first is by introducing
a binding group in the periphery of the ring—a “covalent”
link—by replacing an inert pivalate group with a binding iso-nicotinate group.[12] Second,
we linked them through a cationic thread terminated with a pyridyl
that sits at the center of the ring—a “supramolecular”
link.[35] The covalent link can be bound
to CuII centers, producing a magnetic exchange interaction
between the {Cr7Ni} ring and the CuII as large
as 0.5 cm–1. The supramolecular link when bound
to CuII centers typically leads to interaction energies
orders of magnitude smaller.[35] Here, we
introduce both interactions in one supramolecule.A {Cr7Ni} pseudo-rotaxane was prepared by forming a {Cr7Ni} around a commercially available secondary amine to produce [(pyCH2NH2Et)][Cr7NiF8(O2CBu)16] 1 (where
py = pyridyl, C5H4N) as previously reported
(see Figure a).[35] The pseudo-rotaxane 1 was then
further functionalized by substitution of a carboxylate localized
at the Ni(II) ion, producing [(pyCH2NH2Et)][Cr7NiF8(O2CBu)15(O2C-py)] 2. The structure
of 2 shows that the ring now contains two potential binding
groups: a nitrogen within an iso-nicotinate ligand
and a pyridyl that terminates the thread of the pseudo-rotaxane (Figure S1). Compound 2 is the vital
component in our five-spin ensemble as when it is mixed in THF with
stoichiometric amounts of [Cu(hfac)2(H2O)2] (hfac = 1,1,1,6,6,6-hexafluoroacetylacetonate), it produces
{[Cu(hfac)2(H2O)-2]2-[Cu(hfac)2]} 3 in good yield. The structure
of 3 is shown in Figure b.Compound 3 crystallizes from
THF and toluene. The
central copper(II) site sits on a twofold rotation axis and is six-coordinate-bound
to four O-donors from hfac– ligands and to two cis N-donors from iso-nicotinates. This
will be the switch (S) in our quantum simulator. The second copper(II)
sites are also six-coordinate, bound to four O-donors from hfac– ligands, one N-donor from a thread, and one H2O ligand, which is cis- to the N-donor. These
will be the external sites in the quantum simulator. The two distinct
copper sites are bridged by 2 with the iso-nicotinate group bound to the central S CuII and the
thread N-donor bound to the external E CuII sites. The
overall compound contains five individual spin s = 1/2 units. We have
seen both types of ring···Cu interactions previously,
in two-spin (supramolecular Cu···ring via thread)[35] or three-spin (covalent ring···Cu···ring
via iso-nicotinates)[12] systems, but never together in the same molecule.The Jahn–Teller
axis for the S copper site is easily distinguished
and lies along the only O···Cu···O vector;
these Cu–O bonds are 2.24(1) Å. The other Cu···O
bonds and the Cu–N bonds are 2.00(2) and 2.01(2) Å, respectively.
The Jahn–Teller axis is not as obvious for the E copper sites;
the Cu–N bond is 2.00(1) Å long and the Cu–O bond trans to it is 1.97(1) Å long. The other four Cu–O
bonds range from 2.06(1) to 2.10(1) Å. Therefore, there appears
to be a small Jahn–Teller compression. The shorter Cu1···Cu2
contact is 15.21(1) Å, and the distance between the two terminal
Cu2 sites is 28.05(1) Å. The Cu···Cu···Cu
angle is 134°.The bond lengths within the {Cr7Ni} rings, which are
our qubits Q, are unremarkable. The ring centroid–ring centroid
distance is 16.41(1) Å. The angle between the mean planes of
the rings is 53°; therefore, the inter-ring metal···metal
distances range from 13.76(1) to 21.09(1) Å. We have previously
shown that the g direction
is perpendicular to the mean plane of the {Cr7Ni} ring.[36]
Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Continuous-wave
(CW) Q-band (ca. 34 GHz) electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy
measurements were performed on 3 at 5 K for powder samples
and for a 3 mM 1:1 CH2Cl2/toluene solution.The EPR spectra of 3 are similar in solution and as
a powder (Figure ).
Multiple features are observed at 5 K ranging from 1000 to 1600 mT.
As the structure of 3 is built from components we have
previously seen separately,[12,35] we calculated a spectrum[37] using fixed parameters that we have previously
reported for the various components (Figure ) and the spin Hamiltonian below;where the superscripts E, S, and Q label the
external and internal Cu ions and the rings, respectively. There are
no free variables other than the line width. These parameters (listed
as x, y, z, where x, y, and z refer to the local g-frames
of the components) are as follows: gQ:
1.785, 1.785, and 1.750; gCu: 2.065, 2.085,
and 2.325; ACu: 20, 20, and 500 MHz; JS-Q = 9,174 MHz; JE-Q = 780 MHz. The local g axes of the components are fixed in the orientations
defined by the structures (see above); hence, g of the S Cu is perpendicular to those of the Q rings. The gCu and ACu are used
for both the switch and external CuII sites.
Figure 2
5 K Q-band
(34.068575 GHz) EPR spectra of 3. Experimental
solution (blue) and powder spectra (black) and a calculated spectrum
(red) using previously reported parameters as stated in the text and
a line width of 12 mT. * indicates a Mn impurity in the tube.
5 K Q-band
(34.068575 GHz) EPR spectra of 3. Experimental
solution (blue) and powder spectra (black) and a calculated spectrum
(red) using previously reported parameters as stated in the text and
a line width of 12 mT. * indicates a Mn impurity in the tube.This calculation, with two fixed and isotropic
unique exchange
interactions, is in remarkably good agreement with the experimental
spectrum of 3. The stronger coupling (9174 MHz, 0.306
cm–1) is due to the covalent interaction through
the iso-nicotinate.[12,38] The weaker
coupling (780 MHz, 0.026 cm–1) is the supramolecular
interaction via the thread. The value used is that found for 1 bound to [Cu(hfac)2].[35] We estimate the uncertainties in these J values
as 4 and 15%, respectively, from test calculations varying each in
turn (Figures S4 and S5). By control of
the chemistry, we can predictably vary the interaction energy between
our qubits by over an order of magnitude within the same supramolecule.
Moreover, we have shown that the exchange coupling constants are transferable
between parent fragments and more complex supramolecular systems.The agreement with previous measurements on related complexes also
indicates that the identity of the qubits is retained in the five-spin
complex. The measured phase memories for 3 are 1.00,
1.08, and 0.76 μs at 1045, 1169, and 1291 mT; the first two
field positions correspond to CuII resonances and the last
to the {Cr7Ni} ring (Figure ),[35] in line with parameters
measured for the individual units. These values were then used in
the quantum simulation discussed below.
Quantum Simulation of Decoherence
The five-spin system 3 has remarkable features for quantum information applications:
(i) the identity of the qubits is retained after creating the supramolecular
cluster; and (ii) the very different interaction strengths of the
Cr7Ni rings with the central and external CuII ions. Property (i) is a fundamental requirement to define any quantum
register containing several qubits, whose reciprocal interaction must
be switched on and off to implement general algorithms. Property (ii)
allows 3 to be used to perform a quantum simulation of
decoherence on Bell states.In the proposed setup, Cr7Ni rings are system qubits (labeled as Q1 and Q2 in Figure b). The
central copper is the switch (S) of the effective ring–ring
interaction, and it is exploited to prepare the Bell state of the
system. The two external CuII sites (E1, E2) are used to induce decoherence in a controlled way, i.e.,
simulating the coupling between the quantum system and the environment.
The significant difference between the values of JS-Q and JE-Q is an important resource for the proposed simulation. The large
value of JS-Q enables fast implementation
of conditional dynamics of Q1–Q2 and,
hence, fast preparation of the initial state. On the other hand, the
much smaller JE-Q keeps the state
of the two system qubits Q1 and Q2 factorized
from that of E1 and E2, thus enabling decoherence
to be induced in a controlled way.We illustrate our scheme
to implement the quantum simulation of
decoherence on 3, proceeding in two steps. First, we
prepare the two qubits Q1–Q2 in one of
the maximally entangled two-qubit states known as Bell states[39] (Figure a,b). We consider |Φ+⟩ = (|00⟩
+ |11⟩)/√2 and |Ψ+⟩ = (|01⟩
+ |10⟩)/√2, where 0 and 1 correspond to ↓ and
↑ states of the two Cr7Ni rings in a significant
applied field (the other two Bells states are equivalent). To keep
factorized eigenstates and limit residual coupling when the switch
is off, we consider a static field of 5 T parallel to z (in a global reference frame parallel to Cu principal axes), such
that (gS – gQ)μ ≫ J.[17,40] The significant value of JS-Q makes the excitation of S dependent on the
state of both Q1 and Q2. Starting with the whole
register in the ground state |↓↓↓↓↓⟩,
we build Bell states by combining symmetric single-qubit rotations
on Q1 and Q2 (obtained by pulses resonant with
the Cr7Ni transitions) with a two-qubit controlled-Z gate (see pulse sequence in Figure c and Supporting Information). The latter is obtained by a 2π resonant transition of S,
conditioned on the state of both Q1 and Q2 being
↓. By tuning the rotation angle, we can prepare states |Φ+⟩ or |Ψ+⟩ by choice (Figure ), with remarkable
fidelity, including the finite phase memory time on the different
subunits in the simulation. Despite being symmetric on the two qubits,
the controlled-Z gate (which adds a π phase
only to the |11⟩ component of the Q1-Q2 wave function) implements conditional
dynamics and it is able to generate an entangled pair.
Figure 3
Construction of maximally
entangled Bell states on the system qubits.
(a, b) Time evolution of the probability of finding each of the |Q1Q2⟩ eigenstates during the implementation
of the pulse sequence (reported in the bottom) needed to prepare Bell
states |Φ+⟩ (a) or |Ψ+⟩
(b), including the effect of finite experimental phase memory times
for the different subunits, namely, 0.76 μs for Cr7Ni and ∼1 μs for Cu. (c) Employed pulse sequence, consisting
of pulses addressing either Q1,2 (∼120 GHz) for
initial and final rotations or S (∼170 GHz)
to implement the controlled-Z two-qubit gate on |Q1Q2⟩.
Construction of maximally
entangled Bell states on the system qubits.
(a, b) Time evolution of the probability of finding each of the |Q1Q2⟩ eigenstates during the implementation
of the pulse sequence (reported in the bottom) needed to prepare Bell
states |Φ+⟩ (a) or |Ψ+⟩
(b), including the effect of finite experimental phase memory times
for the different subunits, namely, 0.76 μs for Cr7Ni and ∼1 μs for Cu. (c) Employed pulse sequence, consisting
of pulses addressing either Q1,2 (∼120 GHz) for
initial and final rotations or S (∼170 GHz)
to implement the controlled-Z two-qubit gate on |Q1Q2⟩.As a second step, we simulate the effect of decoherence
by inducing
an evolution of the E1 and E2 spins (the external
Cu spins, modeling the environment) depending on the state of Q1 and Q2 (the rings). As detailed in the SI, this can be done by directly exploiting the
Q1,2–E1,2 coupling JE-Q, which makes all transitions of the Q–E pairs
distinguishable.[14,41] In particular, we implement a R(ϑ) on E1,2, followed by a CNOT gate between Q1,2 (control) and E1,2 (target). By finally measuring only the state of the system
qubits,[42] we effectively mimic decoherence
on {Q1,Q2} in a controlled way. In particular,
the angle is mapped to the decay of coherences in
the system density matrix by sin ϑ = e–, where t is the simulated time in units of the dephasing time T2 of the simulated system (see SI). Hence, by tuning ϑ in the R rotation of E1,2, we simulate the amount
of time during which the system is subject to dephasing (see Figure c).As a prototypical
application of our scheme, we consider a quantum
teleportation (QT) experiment, in which an entangled Bell pair shared
between two parties is exploited to transfer a quantum state between
each other.[39] The failure probability of
the algorithm is directly related to the break of entanglement induced
by decoherence. Hence, we use the error after QT[43] as a measure of the effect of decoherence on the initial
entangled system state. Results are shown in Figure a, as a function of the waiting time between
preparation and actual teleportation (in units of the dephasing time T2). The pulse sequence needed to compute each
point is shown in Figure b, where only E1,2 spins are addressed (either
for rotations or as target of the CNOT). The expected behavior (black
lines) is different for the two initial states |Φ+⟩ and |Ψ+⟩: in the former, the two-quantum
coherence between |00⟩ and |11⟩ components is subject
to a decay rate twice that of a single spin 1/2, with an error on
QT increasing in time from 0 to 0.5. Conversely, |Ψ+⟩ (characterized by only a zero-quantum coherence between
|01⟩ and |10⟩) is immune from dephasing, and hence,
QT is error-free in the presence of a symmetric interaction of the
two spins with the environment.
Figure 4
Quantum simulation of decoherence on the
Bell state, quantified
by the error in a quantum teleportation protocol (a), as a function
of the waiting time before teleportation (in units of the simulated
dephasing time T2). The continuous (dashed)
black line represents the exact expected result for a pair of system
qubits initialized in |Φ+⟩ (|Ψ+⟩). Colored circles (stars) are the corresponding simulations
without including the finite phase memory times of the subunits (red),
with the experimental ones (green) for Cr7Ni and Cu and
with reasonable values, which can be obtained by deuteration (blue).
(b) Pulse sequence implementing the simulation, in which only the
external (E1,2) spins are addressed, with the frequency
depending on the state of the neighboring Q1,2. Rotations
(yellow background) require two slightly different frequencies to
be performed independent of the state of Q1,2, while the
CNOT between Q1,2 (control) and E1,2 (target)
is obtained with a single pulse.
Quantum simulation of decoherence on the
Bell state, quantified
by the error in a quantum teleportation protocol (a), as a function
of the waiting time before teleportation (in units of the simulated
dephasing time T2). The continuous (dashed)
black line represents the exact expected result for a pair of system
qubits initialized in |Φ+⟩ (|Ψ+⟩). Colored circles (stars) are the corresponding simulations
without including the finite phase memory times of the subunits (red),
with the experimental ones (green) for Cr7Ni and Cu and
with reasonable values, which can be obtained by deuteration (blue).
(b) Pulse sequence implementing the simulation, in which only the
external (E1,2) spins are addressed, with the frequency
depending on the state of the neighboring Q1,2. Rotations
(yellow background) require two slightly different frequencies to
be performed independent of the state of Q1,2, while the
CNOT between Q1,2 (control) and E1,2 (target)
is obtained with a single pulse.This opposite behavior is well reproduced by our
simulations (symbols),
even in the presence of the experimentally measured phase memory times,
of about 760 ns on Cr7Ni units (green). We note, however,
that phase memory times of about 3 μs could be obtained by simply
removing hydrogen nuclei via deuteration,[22] without further chemical optimization. By making such a reasonable
assumption, the simulated (blue) points are practically superimposed
on those obtained without including qubit dephasing in the simulations
(red), thus demonstrating that 3 performs very well as
a quantum simulator of decoherence.
Conclusions
We have made and characterized a complex
array of five qubits suited
to perform the quantum simulation of a pair of qubits (encoded in
the Cr7Ni rings), subject to decoherence. If these qubits
are exploited in a quantum teleportation protocol, the effect of decoherence
is to induce an error on the teleported state due to loss of entanglement
within the original Bell state of the pair of qubits. We obtain such
a simulation by exploiting the central Cu as a switch of the interaction
between the rings, thus preparing a Bell state at will by proper pulses.
The external Cu ions are instead used to mimic the effect of the environment.
Results of our simulations, including measured values of all of the
parameters, show a very good agreement with the expected behavior,
demonstrating that 3 can actually work as a quantum simulator
of the dynamics of an open quantum system.The proposed scheme
can be implemented on an ensemble of molecules,
and the final state of only the system Cr7Ni spins can
be read out by spectroscopic techniques. This, in turn, requires full
state tomography of the two-qubit density matrix (see SI). The experimental realization requires microwave
pulses resonant with transitions of all of the subunits. Here, due
to the relatively large value of JS-Q, we considered a magnetic field of 5 T to keep the state of the
two rings factorized from that of the switch, thus avoiding unwanted
residual evolution. As shown in Figures c and 4b, this implies
microwave pulses of frequencies approximately 120 and 170/160 GHz
to address Q and S/E, respectively. Nevertheless, it is important
to note that a proof-of-principle experiment can already be performed
with not perfectly factorized states, using 3 and a magnetic
field of about 3.5 T, corresponding to W-band EPR frequencies.In general, since factorization of the eigenstates scales as J/B, a small reduction of JS-Q would allow a proportional reduction of the
static field and hence of the pulse frequencies, keeping the same
(almost ideal) conditions used in our simulations. This would require
reducing JS-Q by a factor 1.5 to
move to the W-band. This is chemically achievable.[35]Another possibility to reduce the static field is
to have a slight
asymmetry between the two rings because the corresponding difference
between Zeeman energies of the rings leads to factorized states. A
similar asymmetry (e.g., a rotation of the coordination environment)
could also be useful to separately address the two external ions,
thus simulating the effect of an asymmetric coupling to the environment.An experimental realization of the proposed scheme requires using
significantly different microwave frequencies. This could be done
by employing a multimode resonator; it has been suggested that excitation
bandwidths of 4 GHz could be possible.[44] Alternatively, one could employ an architecture based on superconducting
resonators, where
frequencies differing by more than a factor of 7 have already been
demonstrated.[45] These devices typically
operate in the few tens of GHz range.[46] This, in turn, would require a reduction of the applied
field and hence of the exchange couplings, which is feasible in this
chemistry.The proposed approach is general and allows one to
simulate the
dynamics of a generic open quantum system (e.g., a linear chain of
qubits), subject to other dissipative processes, such as relaxation
or the depolarizing channel.[42] The basic
principles are the same as illustrated above for our specific example:
given a decomposition of the incoherent evolution into Kraus operators,[39] these are translated into a linear sum of d unitary operators, which are simulated with the addition
of a d-dimensional ancilla to the system qubits.
Finally, by measuring the system state independently from the ancillary
one (i.e., summing over all states of the ancillae), we achieve a
simulation of the dissipative dynamics of the system.
Authors: Arzhang Ardavan; Olivier Rival; John J L Morton; Stephen J Blundell; Alexei M Tyryshkin; Grigore A Timco; Richard E P Winpenny Journal: Phys Rev Lett Date: 2007-01-29 Impact factor: 9.161
Authors: Julio T Barreiro; Markus Müller; Philipp Schindler; Daniel Nigg; Thomas Monz; Michael Chwalla; Markus Hennrich; Christian F Roos; Peter Zoller; Rainer Blatt Journal: Nature Date: 2011-02-24 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Ignacio Gimeno; Wenzel Kersten; María C Pallarés; Pablo Hermosilla; Maria Jose Martinez-Perez; Mark D Jenkins; Andreas Angerer; Carlos Sánchez-Azqueta; David Zueco; Johannes Majer; Anabel Lostao; Fernando Luis Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2020-05-22 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Selena J Lockyer; Alistair J Fielding; George F S Whitehead; Grigore A Timco; Richard E P Winpenny; Eric J L McInnes Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2019-09-09 Impact factor: 15.419