Literature DB >> 36006563

National epidemiologic trends (2008-2018) in the United States for the incidence and expenditures associated with incisional hernia in relation to abdominal surgery.

A J Rios-Diaz1,2, M P Morris1, A N Christopher1,2, V Patel1, R B Broach1, B T Heniford3, J Y Hsu4, J P Fischer5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: It is unknown whether the trend of rising incisional hernia (IH) repair (IHR) incidence and costs until 2011 currently persists. We aimed to evaluate how the IHR procedure incidence, cost and patient risk-profile have changed over the last decade relative to all abdominal surgeries (AS).
METHODS: Repeated cross-sectional analysis of 38,512,737 patients undergoing inpatient 4AS including IHR within the 2008-2018 National Inpatient Sample. Yearly incidence (procedures/1,000,000 people [PMP]), hospital costs, surgical and patient characteristics were compared between IHR and AS using generalized linear and multinomial regression.
RESULTS: Between 2008-2018, 3.1% of AS were IHR (1,200,568/38,512,737). There was a steeper decrease in the incidence of AS (356.5 PMP/year) compared to IHR procedures (12.0 PMP/year) which resulted in the IHR burden relative to AS (2008-2018: 12,576.3 to 9,113.4 PMP; trend difference P < 0.01). National costs averaged $47.9 and 1.7 billion/year for AS and IHR, respectively. From 2008-2018, procedure costs increased significantly for AS (68.2%) and IHR (74.6%; trends P < 0.01). Open IHR downtrended (42.2%), whereas laparoscopic (511.1%) and robotic (19,301%) uptrended significantly (trends P < 0.01). For both AS and IHR, the proportion of older (65-85y), Black and Hispanic, publicly-insured, and low-income patients, with higher comorbidity burden, undergoing elective procedures at small- and medium-sized hospitals uptrended significantly (all P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: IH persists as a healthcare burden as demonstrated by the increased proportion of IHR relative to all AS, disproportionate presence of high-risk patients that undergo these procedures, and increased costs. Targeted efforts for IH prevention have the potential of decreasing $17 M/year in costs for every 1% reduction.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdominal surgery; Epidemiology; Healthcare burden; Hospital costs; Incisional hernia; Nationwide inpatient sample

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36006563     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-022-02644-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   2.920


  37 in total

1.  Outcomes of open abdomen versus primary closure following emergent laparotomy for suspected secondary peritonitis: A propensity-matched analysis.

Authors:  Angela M Kao; Lawrence N Cetrulo; Maria R Baimas-George; Tanushree Prasad; Brant Todd Heniford; Bradley R Davis; Kevin R Kasten
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.313

2.  Early versus delayed complex abdominal wall reconstruction with biologic mesh following damage-control surgery.

Authors:  Shekhar Gogna; Rifat Latifi; James Choi; Jorge Con; Kartik Prabhakaran; Patrice L Anderson; Anthony J Policastro; Joshua Klein; David J Samson; Abbas Smiley; Peter Rhee
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.313

3.  Incisional Hernia in the United States: Trends in Hospital Encounters and Corresponding Healthcare Charges.

Authors:  Valeriy Shubinets; Justin P Fox; Michael A Lanni; Michael G Tecce; Eric M Pauli; William W Hope; Stephen J Kovach; John P Fischer
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 0.688

4.  Nomogram to Predict Postoperative Intra-abdominal Septic Complications After Bowel Resection and Primary Anastomosis for Crohn's Disease.

Authors:  Feng Zhu; Yi Li; Zhen Guo; Lei Cao; Dengyu Feng; Tenghui Zhang; Weiming Zhu; Jianfeng Gong
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Epidemiology and cost of ventral hernia repair: making the case for hernia research.

Authors:  B K Poulose; J Shelton; S Phillips; D Moore; W Nealon; D Penson; W Beck; M D Holzman
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Predictors of 30- and 90-Day Readmissions After Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction With Biological Mesh: A Longitudinal Study of 232 Patients.

Authors:  Shekhar Gogna; Rifat Latifi; James Choi; Jorge Con; Kartik Prabhakaran; Abbas Smiley; Patrice L Anderson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Impact of incisional hernia on health-related quality of life and body image: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Gabrielle H van Ramshorst; Hasan H Eker; Wim C J Hop; Johannes Jeekel; Johan F Lange
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 8.  Bilateral transversus abdominis release: Complex hernia repair without sacrificing quality of life.

Authors:  Adrienne N Christopher; Cody Fowler; Viren Patel; Joseph A Mellia; Martin P Morris; Robyn B Broach; John P Fischer
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Multicenter, Prospective, Longitudinal Study of the Recurrence, Surgical Site Infection, and Quality of Life After Contaminated Ventral Hernia Repair Using Biosynthetic Absorbable Mesh: The COBRA Study.

Authors:  Michael J Rosen; Joel J Bauer; Marco Harmaty; Alfredo M Carbonell; William S Cobb; Brent Matthews; Matthew I Goldblatt; Don J Selzer; Benjamin K Poulose; Bibi M E Hansson; Camiel Rosman; James J Chao; Garth R Jacobsen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Biomechanical Parameters of Mesh Reinforcement and Analysis of a Novel Device for Incisional Hernia Prevention.

Authors:  Charles A Messa; Jonathan Sanchez; Geoffrey M Kozak; Snehal Shetye; Ashley Rodriguez; John P Fischer
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 2.192

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.