Literature DB >> 21904861

Epidemiology and cost of ventral hernia repair: making the case for hernia research.

B K Poulose1, J Shelton, S Phillips, D Moore, W Nealon, D Penson, W Beck, M D Holzman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Ventral hernia repair (VHR) lacks standardization of care and exhibits variation in delivery. Complications of VHR, notably recurrence and infection, increase costs. Efforts at obtaining federal funding for VHR research are frequently unsuccessful, in part due to misperceptions that VHR is not a clinical challenge and has minimal impact on healthcare resources. We analyzed national trends for VHR performance and associated costs to demonstrate potential savings resulting from an improvement in outcomes.
METHODS: Inpatient non-federal discharges for VHR were identified from the 2001-2006 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, supplemented by the Center for Disease Control 2006 National Survey of Ambulatory Surgery for outpatient estimates. The total number of VHRs performed in the US was estimated along with associated costs. Costs were standardized to 2010 US dollars using the Consumer Price Index and reported as mean with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).
RESULTS: The number of inpatient VHRs increased from 126,548 in 2001 to 154,278 in 2006. Including 193,543 outpatient operations, an estimated 348,000 VHRs were performed for 2006. Inpatient costs consistently rose with 2006 costs estimated at US $15,899 (95% CI $15,394-$16,404) per operation. Estimated cost for outpatient VHR was US $3,873 (95% CI $2,788-$4,958). The total cost of VHR for 2006 was US $3.2 billion.
CONCLUSIONS: VHRs continue to rise in incidence and cost. By reducing recurrence rate alone, a cost saving of US $32 million dollars for each 1% reduction in operations would result. Further research is necessary for improved understanding of ventral hernia etiology and treatment and is critical to cost effective healthcare.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21904861     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-011-0879-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  10 in total

1.  A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia.

Authors:  R W Luijendijk; W C Hop; M P van den Tol; D C de Lange; M M Braaksma; J N IJzermans; R U Boelhouwer; B C de Vries; M K Salu; J C Wereldsma; C M Bruijninckx; J Jeekel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-08-10       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Long-term results of polyglactin mesh for the prevention of incisional hernias in obese patients.

Authors:  A Pans; P Elen; W Dewé; C Desaive
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Laparoscopic versus open surgical techniques for ventral or incisional hernia repair.

Authors:  Stefan Sauerland; Maren Walgenbach; Brigitte Habermalz; Christoph M Seiler; Marc Miserez
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-03-16

Review 4.  Reclosure of the disrupted laparotomy wound: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mary Ellen Wechter; Mark D Pearlman; Katherine E Hartmann
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Have outcomes of incisional hernia repair improved with time? A population-based analysis.

Authors:  David R Flum; Karen Horvath; Thomas Koepsell
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Epidemiologic, economic, and sociologic aspects of hernia surgery in the United States in the 1990s.

Authors:  I M Rutkow
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.741

7.  Demographic and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States in 2003.

Authors:  Ira M Rutkow
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.741

8.  A randomized clinical trial comparing two methods of fascia closure following midline laparotomy.

Authors:  J B Trimbos; I B Smit; J P Holm; J Hermans
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1992-10

9.  Laparoscopic versus open incisional hernia repair: a single-institution analysis of hospital resource utilization for 884 consecutive cases.

Authors:  D Earle; N Seymour; E Fellinger; A Perez
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 3.453

Review 10.  Open surgical procedures for incisional hernias.

Authors:  Dennis den Hartog; Alphons H M Dur; Wim E Tuinebreijer; Robert W Kreis
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-07-16
  10 in total
  174 in total

1.  Long-term evaluation of adhesion formation and foreign body response to three new meshes.

Authors:  R R M Vogels; K W Y van Barneveld; J W A M Bosmans; G Beets; M J J Gijbels; M H F Schreinemacher; N D Bouvy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  A validated, risk assessment tool for predicting readmission after open ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  P A Baltodano; Y Webb-Vargas; K C Soares; C W Hicks; C M Cooney; P Cornell; K K Burce; T M Pawlik; F E Eckhauser
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Proposal for a national triage system for the management of ventral hernias.

Authors:  S G Parker; T H Reid; R Boulton; C Wood; D Sanders; Ajc Windsor
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  The effect of smoking on surgical outcomes in ventral hernia repair: a propensity score matched analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data.

Authors:  N P Borad; A M Merchant
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Sarcopenia and outcomes in ventral hernia repair: a preliminary review.

Authors:  S R Siegal; A R Guimaraes; M R Lasarev; R G Martindale; S B Orenstein
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Mesh Sprayer Device with Liquefied Mesh Delivery System: Proposed Alternative for Currently Available Meshes in Hernia Repair and Supplement to Abdominal Closure.

Authors:  Alireza Hamidian Jahromi; David H Ballard; F Dean Griffen
Journal:  Clin Surg       Date:  2020-03-06

7.  Surgical site occurrences, not body mass index, increase the long-term risk of ventral hernia recurrence.

Authors:  Joshua S Jolissaint; Bryan V Dieffenbach; Thomas C Tsai; Luise I Pernar; Brent T Shoji; Stanley W Ashley; Ali Tavakkoli
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Inhibition of connexin 43 hemichannel-mediated ATP release attenuates early inflammation during the foreign body response.

Authors:  Bennett W Calder; Joshua Matthew Rhett; Heather Bainbridge; Stephen A Fann; Robert G Gourdie; Michael J Yost
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.845

9.  External validation of the ventral hernia risk score for prediction of surgical site infections.

Authors:  Mike K Liang; Christopher J Goodenough; Robert G Martindale; J Scott Roth; Lillian S Kao
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.150

10.  Increased incidence of surgical site infection with a body mass index ≥ 35 kg/m2 following abdominal wall reconstruction with open component separation.

Authors:  Salvatore Docimo; Konstantinos Spaniolas; Michael Svestka; Andrew T Bates; Samer Sbayi; Jessica Schnur; Mark Talamini; Aurora D Pryor
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.