Literature DB >> 36006494

National Practice Patterns in the Management of the Regional Lymph Node Basin After Positive Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Cutaneous Melanoma.

Cimarron E Sharon1, Richard J Straker2, Eric H Li3, Giorgos C Karakousis2, John T Miura2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Immediate completion lymph node dissection (CLND) for patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis from cutaneous melanoma has been replaced largely by ultrasound nodal surveillance since the publication of two landmark trials in 2016 and 2017. National practice patterns of CLND remain poorly characterized.
METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma in 2016 and 2018 without clinical nodal disease who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) were identified from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Characteristics associated with CLND were analyzed by uni- and multivariate logistic regression. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses.
RESULTS: Of the 3517 patients included in the study, 1405 had disease diagnosed in 2016. The patients with cutaneous melanoma diagnosed in 2016 had a median age of 60 years and a tumor thickness of 2.3 mm compared to 62 years and 2.4 mm, respectively, for the patients with cutaneous melanoma diagnosed in 2018. According to the NCDB, 40 % (n = 559) of the patients underwent CLND in 2016 compared with 6 % (n = 132) in 2018. The factors associated with receipt of CLND in 2018 included younger age (odds ratio [OR], 0.97; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.95-0.99; p = 0.001), rural residence (OR, 3.96; 95 % CI, 1.50-10.49; p = 0.006), head/neck tumor location (OR, 1.88; 95 % CI, 1.10-3.23; p = 0.021), and more than one positive SLN (OR, 1.80; 95 % CI, 1.17-2.76; p = 0.007). The 5-year OS did not differ between the patients who received SLNB only and those who underwent CLND (hazard ratio [HR], 0.93; p = 0.54).
CONCLUSION: The rates of CLND have decreased nationally. However, patients with head/neck primary tumors who live in rural locations are more likely to undergo CLND, highlighting populations for which treatment may be non-uniform with national practice patterns.
© 2022. Society of Surgical Oncology.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36006494     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12364-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   4.339


  28 in total

1.  Morbidity and recurrence after completion lymph node dissection following sentinel lymph node biopsy in cutaneous malignant melanoma.

Authors:  Merlin M Guggenheim; Urs Hug; Florian J Jung; Valentin Rousson; Matthias C Aust; Maurizio Calcagni; Walter Künzi; Pietro Giovanoli
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Complete lymph node dissection versus no dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node biopsy positive melanoma (DeCOG-SLT): a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Ulrike Leiter; Rudolf Stadler; Cornelia Mauch; Werner Hohenberger; Norbert Brockmeyer; Carola Berking; Cord Sunderkötter; Martin Kaatz; Klaus-Werner Schulte; Percy Lehmann; Thomas Vogt; Jens Ulrich; Rudolf Herbst; Wolfgang Gehring; Jan-Christoph Simon; Ulrike Keim; Peter Martus; Claus Garbe
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 3.  The Landmark Series: MSLT-1, MSLT-2 and DeCOG (Management of Lymph Nodes).

Authors:  Danielle M Bello; Mark B Faries
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Do patients with tumor-positive sentinel nodes constitute a homogeneous group?

Authors:  N Cascinelli; C Clemente; C Bifulco; G Tragni; A Morabito; M Santinami; F Belli
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 5.  Current management of melanoma: benefits of surgical staging and adjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Kelly M McMasters; Susan M Swetter
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  Final trial report of sentinel-node biopsy versus nodal observation in melanoma.

Authors:  Donald L Morton; John F Thompson; Alistair J Cochran; Nicola Mozzillo; Omgo E Nieweg; Daniel F Roses; Harold J Hoekstra; Constantine P Karakousis; Christopher A Puleo; Brendon J Coventry; Mohammed Kashani-Sabet; B Mark Smithers; Eberhard Paul; William G Kraybill; J Gregory McKinnon; He-Jing Wang; Robert Elashoff; Mark B Faries
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Future perspectives on malignant melanoma.

Authors:  Stanley P L Leong
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.741

8.  Positive nonsentinel node status predicts mortality in patients with cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Charlotte Ariyan; Mary Sue Brady; Mithat Gönen; Klaus Busam; Daniel Coit
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Prognosis in patients with sentinel node-positive melanoma is accurately defined by the combined Rotterdam tumor load and Dewar topography criteria.

Authors:  Augustinus P T van der Ploeg; Alexander C J van Akkooi; Piotr Rutkowski; Zbigniew I Nowecki; Wanda Michej; Angana Mitra; Julia A Newton-Bishop; Martin Cook; Iris M C van der Ploeg; Omgo E Nieweg; Mari F C M van den Hout; Paul A M van Leeuwen; Christiane A Voit; Francesco Cataldo; Alessandro Testori; Caroline Robert; Harald J Hoekstra; Cornelis Verhoef; Alain Spatz; Alexander M M Eggermont
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Morbidity After Inguinal Lymph Node Dissections: It Is Time for a Change.

Authors:  Marloes Faut; Rianne M Heidema; Harald J Hoekstra; Robert J van Ginkel; S Lukas B Been; Schelto Kruijff; Barbara L van Leeuwen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.