Literature DB >> 24521106

Final trial report of sentinel-node biopsy versus nodal observation in melanoma.

Donald L Morton1, John F Thompson, Alistair J Cochran, Nicola Mozzillo, Omgo E Nieweg, Daniel F Roses, Harold J Hoekstra, Constantine P Karakousis, Christopher A Puleo, Brendon J Coventry, Mohammed Kashani-Sabet, B Mark Smithers, Eberhard Paul, William G Kraybill, J Gregory McKinnon, He-Jing Wang, Robert Elashoff, Mark B Faries.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sentinel-node biopsy, a minimally invasive procedure for regional melanoma staging, was evaluated in a phase 3 trial.
METHODS: We evaluated outcomes in 2001 patients with primary cutaneous melanomas randomly assigned to undergo wide excision and nodal observation, with lymphadenectomy for nodal relapse (observation group), or wide excision and sentinel-node biopsy, with immediate lymphadenectomy for nodal metastases detected on biopsy (biopsy group). Results No significant treatment-related difference in the 10-year melanoma-specific survival rate was seen in the overall study population (20.8% with and 79.2% without nodal metastases). Mean (± SE) 10-year disease-free survival rates were significantly improved in the biopsy group, as compared with the observation group, among patients with intermediate-thickness melanomas, defined as 1.20 to 3.50 mm (71.3 ± 1.8% vs. 64.7 ± 2.3%; hazard ratio for recurrence or metastasis, 0.76; P=0.01), and those with thick melanomas, defined as >3.50 mm (50.7 ± 4.0% vs. 40.5 ± 4.7%; hazard ratio, 0.70; P=0.03). Among patients with intermediate-thickness melanomas, the 10-year melanoma-specific survival rate was 62.1 ± 4.8% among those with metastasis versus 85.1 ± 1.5% for those without metastasis (hazard ratio for death from melanoma, 3.09; P<0.001); among patients with thick melanomas, the respective rates were 48.0 ± 7.0% and 64.6 ± 4.9% (hazard ratio, 1.75; P=0.03). Biopsy-based management improved the 10-year rate of distant disease-free survival (hazard ratio for distant metastasis, 0.62; P=0.02) and the 10-year rate of melanoma-specific survival (hazard ratio for death from melanoma, 0.56; P=0.006) for patients with intermediate-thickness melanomas and nodal metastases. Accelerated-failure-time latent-subgroup analysis was performed to account for the fact that nodal status was initially known only in the biopsy group, and a significant treatment benefit persisted.
CONCLUSIONS: Biopsy-based staging of intermediate-thickness or thick primary melanomas provides important prognostic information and identifies patients with nodal metastases who may benefit from immediate complete lymphadenectomy. Biopsy-based management prolongs disease-free survival for all patients and prolongs distant disease-free survival and melanoma-specific survival for patients with nodal metastases from intermediate-thickness melanomas. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, and the Australia and New Zealand Melanoma Trials Group; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00275496.).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24521106      PMCID: PMC4058881          DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1310460

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  28 in total

1.  The case for lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy in the management of primary melanoma.

Authors:  D L Morton; A J Cochran
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 9.302

2.  Inefficacy of immediate node dissection in stage 1 melanoma of the limbs.

Authors:  U Veronesi; J Adamus; D C Bandiera; I O Brennhovd; E Caceres; N Cascinelli; F Claudio; R L Ikonopisov; V V Javorskj; S Kirov; A Kulakowski; J Lacoub; F Lejeune; Z Mechl; A Morabito; I Rodé; S Sergeev; E van Slooten; K Szcygiel; N N Trapeznikov
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1977-09-22       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Sentinel lymph nodes show profound downregulation of antigen-presenting cells of the paracortex: implications for tumor biology and treatment.

Authors:  A J Cochran; D L Morton; S Stern; A M Lana; R Essner; D R Wen
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 7.842

4.  Can elective lymph node dissection decrease the frequency and mortality rate of late melanoma recurrences?

Authors:  P Shen; J M Guenther; L A Wanek; D L Morton
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Long-term results of a multi-institutional randomized trial comparing prognostic factors and surgical results for intermediate thickness melanomas (1.0 to 4.0 mm). Intergroup Melanoma Surgical Trial.

Authors:  C M Balch; S Soong; M I Ross; M M Urist; C P Karakousis; W J Temple; M C Mihm; R L Barnhill; W R Jewell; H J Wanebo; R Harrison
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Latent subgroup analysis of a randomized clinical trial through a semiparametric accelerated failure time mixture model.

Authors:  L Altstein; G Li
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Excision margins in high-risk malignant melanoma.

Authors:  J Meirion Thomas; Julia Newton-Bishop; Roger A'Hern; Gill Coombes; Michael Timmons; Judy Evans; Martin Cook; Jeffery Theaker; Mary Fallowfield; Trevor O'Neill; Wlodek Ruka; Judith M Bliss
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-02-19       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for early-stage melanoma: therapeutic utility and implications of nodal microanatomy and molecular staging for improving the accuracy of detection of nodal micrometastases.

Authors:  Donald L Morton; Dave S B Hoon; Alistair J Cochran; Roderick R Turner; Richard Essner; Hiroya Takeuchi; Leslie A Wanek; Edwin Glass; Leland J Foshag; Eddy C Hsueh; Anton J Bilchik; David Elashoff; Robert Elashoff
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Late recurrence in melanoma: clinical implications of lost dormancy.

Authors:  Mark B Faries; Shawn Steen; Xing Ye; Myung Sim; Donald L Morton
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  A prospective randomized study of the efficacy of routine elective lymphadenectomy in management of malignant melanoma. Preliminary results.

Authors:  F H Sim; W F Taylor; J C Ivins; D J Pritchard; E H Soule
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  267 in total

1.  Tumor-draining lymph nodes are pivotal in PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint therapy.

Authors:  Marieke F Fransen; Mark Schoonderwoerd; Philipp Knopf; Marcel Gm Camps; Lukas Jac Hawinkels; Manfred Kneilling; Thorbald van Hall; Ferry Ossendorp
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2018-12-06

Review 2.  A review of sentinel lymph node biopsy for thin melanoma.

Authors:  K M Joyce; N M McInerney; C W Joyce; D M Jones; A J Hussey; P Donnellan; M J Kerin; J L Kelly; P J Regan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 3.  Chinese Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Melanoma (2015 Edition).

Authors:  Jun Guo; Shukui Qin; Jun Liang; Tongyu Lin; Lu Si; Xiaohong Chen; Zhihong Chi; Chuanliang Cui; Nan Du; Yun Fan; Kangsheng Gu; Fang Li; Junling Li; Yongheng Li; Houjie Liang; Jiwei Liu; Man Lu; Aiping Lu; Kejun Nan; Xiaohui Niu; Hongming Pan; Guoxin Ren; Xiubao Ren; Yongqian Shu; Xin Song; Min Tao; Baocheng Wang; Wenbin Wei; Di Wu; Lingying Wu; Aiwen Wu; Xiaolin Xu; Junyi Zhang; Xiaoshi Zhang; Yiping Zhang; Huiyan Zhu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-12

4.  MSLT-I-response of clinical trial investigators.

Authors:  James C Yang; Richard M Sherry
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Clinicopathological Features, Staging, and Current Approaches to Treatment in High-Risk Resectable Melanoma.

Authors:  Emily Z Keung; Jeffrey E Gershenwald
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Validation of Melanoma Immune Profile (MIP), a Prognostic Immune Gene Prediction Score for Stage II-III Melanoma.

Authors:  Robyn D Gartrell; Douglas K Marks; Emanuelle M Rizk; Margaret Bogardus; Camille L Gérard; Luke W Barker; Yichun Fu; Camden L Esancy; Gen Li; Jiayi Ji; Shumin Rui; Marc S Ernstoff; Bret Taback; Sarabjot Pabla; Rui Chang; Sandra J Lee; John J Krolewski; Carl Morrison; Basil A Horst; Yvonne M Saenger
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Comparison of Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography-Computed Tomography (SPECT/CT) and Conventional Planar Lymphoscintigraphy for Sentinel Node Localization in Patients with Cutaneous Malignancies.

Authors:  Matthew P Doepker; Maki Yamamoto; Matthew A Applebaum; Nupur U Patel; M Jaime Montilla-Soler; Amod A Sarnaik; C Wayne Cruse; Vernon K Sondak; Jonathan S Zager
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 8.  Long-term follow-up for melanoma patients: is there any evidence of a benefit?

Authors:  Natasha M Rueth; Kate D Cromwell; Janice N Cormier
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 3.495

9.  Primary excision margins, sentinel lymph node biopsy, and completion lymph node dissection in cutaneous melanoma: a clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  F C Wright; L H Souter; S Kellett; A Easson; C Murray; J Toye; D McCready; C Nessim; D Ghazarian; N J Look Hong; S Johnson; D P Goldstein; T Petrella
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.677

10.  What is the Cost-Effective Treatment for Melanoma Patients with a Positive Sentinel Node?

Authors:  Hayley Standage; Alyssa R Hersh; Aaron Caughey; Matthew Taylor; John Vetto; Dale Han
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-09-19       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.