Alexander Rau1, Martin Soschynski2, Jana Taron2, Philipp Ruile3, Christopher L Schlett2, Fabian Bamberg2, Tobias Krauss2. 1. Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland. alexander.rau@uniklinik-freiburg.de. 2. Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland. 3. Klinik für Klinik für Kardiologie und Angiologie, Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg - Bad Krozingen, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Bad Krozingen, Deutschland.
Abstract
CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE: Cardiac diseases are the leading cause of death. Many diseases can be specifically treated once a valid diagnosis is established. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a central role in the workup of many cardiac pathologies. However, image acquisition as well as interpretation and related secondary image evaluation are time-consuming and complex. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS: Cardiac MRI is becoming increasingly established in international guidelines for the evaluation of cardiac function and differential diagnosis of a wide variety of cardiac diseases. METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS: Cardiac MRI has limited reproducibility due to the acquisition technique and interpretation of findings with complex secondary measurements. Artificial intelligence techniques and radiomics offer the potential to improve the acquisition, interpretation, and reproducibility of cardiac MRI. PERFORMANCE: Research suggests that artificial intelligence and radiomic analysis can improve cardiac MRI in terms of image acquisition and also diagnostic and prognostic value. Furthermore, the implementation of artificial intelligence and radiomics may result in the identification of new biomarkers. ACHIEVEMENTS AND PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: The implementation of artificial intelligence in cardiac MRI has great potential. However, the current level of evidence is still limited in some aspects; in particular there are too few prospective and large multicenter studies available. As a result, the algorithms developed are often not sufficiently validated scientifically and are not yet applied in clinical routine.
CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE: Cardiac diseases are the leading cause of death. Many diseases can be specifically treated once a valid diagnosis is established. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a central role in the workup of many cardiac pathologies. However, image acquisition as well as interpretation and related secondary image evaluation are time-consuming and complex. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS: Cardiac MRI is becoming increasingly established in international guidelines for the evaluation of cardiac function and differential diagnosis of a wide variety of cardiac diseases. METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS: Cardiac MRI has limited reproducibility due to the acquisition technique and interpretation of findings with complex secondary measurements. Artificial intelligence techniques and radiomics offer the potential to improve the acquisition, interpretation, and reproducibility of cardiac MRI. PERFORMANCE: Research suggests that artificial intelligence and radiomic analysis can improve cardiac MRI in terms of image acquisition and also diagnostic and prognostic value. Furthermore, the implementation of artificial intelligence and radiomics may result in the identification of new biomarkers. ACHIEVEMENTS AND PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: The implementation of artificial intelligence in cardiac MRI has great potential. However, the current level of evidence is still limited in some aspects; in particular there are too few prospective and large multicenter studies available. As a result, the algorithms developed are often not sufficiently validated scientifically and are not yet applied in clinical routine.
Authors: Yan Xia; Nishant Ravikumar; John P Greenwood; Stefan Neubauer; Steffen E Petersen; Alejandro F Frangi Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2021-04-06 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Garry Choy; Omid Khalilzadeh; Mark Michalski; Synho Do; Anthony E Samir; Oleg S Pianykh; J Raymond Geis; Pari V Pandharipande; James A Brink; Keith J Dreyer Journal: Radiology Date: 2018-06-26 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Juhani Knuuti; William Wijns; Antti Saraste; Davide Capodanno; Emanuele Barbato; Christian Funck-Brentano; Eva Prescott; Robert F Storey; Christi Deaton; Thomas Cuisset; Stefan Agewall; Kenneth Dickstein; Thor Edvardsen; Javier Escaned; Bernard J Gersh; Pavel Svitil; Martine Gilard; David Hasdai; Robert Hatala; Felix Mahfoud; Josep Masip; Claudio Muneretto; Marco Valgimigli; Stephan Achenbach; Jeroen J Bax Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2020-01-14 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Theresa A McDonagh; Marco Metra; Marianna Adamo; Roy S Gardner; Andreas Baumbach; Michael Böhm; Haran Burri; Javed Butler; Jelena Čelutkienė; Ovidiu Chioncel; John G F Cleland; Andrew J S Coats; Maria G Crespo-Leiro; Dimitrios Farmakis; Martine Gilard; Stephane Heymans; Arno W Hoes; Tiny Jaarsma; Ewa A Jankowska; Mitja Lainscak; Carolyn S P Lam; Alexander R Lyon; John J V McMurray; Alexandre Mebazaa; Richard Mindham; Claudio Muneretto; Massimo Francesco Piepoli; Susanna Price; Giuseppe M C Rosano; Frank Ruschitzka; Anne Kathrine Skibelund Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2021-09-21 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Christopher Schuppert; Ricarda von Krüchten; Jochen G Hirsch; Susanne Rospleszcz; Daniel C Hoinkiss; Sonja Selder; Alexander Köhn; Oyunbileg von Stackelberg; Annette Peters; Henry Völzke; Thomas Kröncke; Thoralf Niendorf; Michael Forsting; Norbert Hosten; Thomas Hendel; Tobias Pischon; Karl-Heinz Jöckel; Rudolf Kaaks; Fabian Bamberg; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Matthias Günther; Christopher L Schlett Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2022-02-21 Impact factor: 10.065
Authors: Steffen E Petersen; Nay Aung; Mihir M Sanghvi; Filip Zemrak; Kenneth Fung; Jose Miguel Paiva; Jane M Francis; Mohammed Y Khanji; Elena Lukaschuk; Aaron M Lee; Valentina Carapella; Young Jin Kim; Paul Leeson; Stefan K Piechnik; Stefan Neubauer Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2017-02-03 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Andreas Hauptmann; Simon Arridge; Felix Lucka; Vivek Muthurangu; Jennifer A Steeden Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-09-08 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Hugo J W L Aerts; Emmanuel Rios Velazquez; Ralph T H Leijenaar; Chintan Parmar; Patrick Grossmann; Sara Carvalho; Sara Cavalho; Johan Bussink; René Monshouwer; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Derek Rietveld; Frank Hoebers; Michelle M Rietbergen; C René Leemans; Andre Dekker; John Quackenbush; Robert J Gillies; Philippe Lambin Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2014-06-03 Impact factor: 14.919