Literature DB >> 31038407

Deep Learning for Diagnosis of Chronic Myocardial Infarction on Nonenhanced Cardiac Cine MRI.

Nan Zhang1, Guang Yang1, Zhifan Gao1, Chenchu Xu1, Yanping Zhang1, Rui Shi1, Jennifer Keegan1, Lei Xu1, Heye Zhang1, Zhanming Fan1, David Firmin1.   

Abstract

Background Renal impairment is common in patients with coronary artery disease and, if severe, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging for myocardial infarction (MI) evaluation cannot be performed. Purpose To develop a fully automatic framework for chronic MI delineation via deep learning on non-contrast material-enhanced cardiac cine MRI. Materials and Methods In this retrospective single-center study, a deep learning model was developed to extract motion features from the left ventricle and delineate MI regions on nonenhanced cardiac cine MRI collected between October 2015 and March 2017. Patients with chronic MI, as well as healthy control patients, had both nonenhanced cardiac cine (25 phases per cardiac cycle) and LGE MRI examinations. Eighty percent of MRI examinations were used for the training data set and 20% for the independent testing data set. Chronic MI regions on LGE MRI were defined as ground truth. Diagnostic performance was assessed by analysis of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). MI area and MI area percentage from nonenhanced cardiac cine and LGE MRI were compared by using the Pearson correlation, paired t test, and Bland-Altman analysis. Results Study participants included 212 patients with chronic MI (men, 171; age, 57.2 years ± 12.5) and 87 healthy control patients (men, 42; age, 43.3 years ± 15.5). Using the full cardiac cine MRI, the per-segment sensitivity and specificity for detecting chronic MI in the independent test set was 89.8% and 99.1%, respectively, with an AUC of 0.94. There were no differences between nonenhanced cardiac cine and LGE MRI analyses in number of MI segments (114 vs 127, respectively; P = .38), per-patient MI area (6.2 cm2 ± 2.8 vs 5.5 cm2 ± 2.3, respectively; P = .27; correlation coefficient, r = 0.88), and MI area percentage (21.5% ± 17.3 vs 18.5% ± 15.4; P = .17; correlation coefficient, r = 0.89). Conclusion The proposed deep learning framework on nonenhanced cardiac cine MRI enables the confirmation (presence), detection (position), and delineation (transmurality and size) of chronic myocardial infarction. However, future larger-scale multicenter studies are required for a full validation. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Leiner in this issue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31038407     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019182304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  37 in total

1.  Parametric-based feature selection via spherical harmonic coefficients for the left ventricle myocardial infarction screening.

Authors:  Gelareh Valizadeh; Farshid Babapour Mofrad; Ahmad Shalbaf
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  CT radiomics nomogram for the preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yue Wang; Wei Liu; Yang Yu; Jing-Juan Liu; Hua-Dan Xue; Ya-Fei Qi; Jing Lei; Jian-Chun Yu; Zheng-Yu Jin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Comprehensive enhanced methodology of an MRI-based automated left-ventricular chamber quantification algorithm and validation in chemotherapy-related cardiotoxicity.

Authors:  Julia Kar; Michael V Cohen; Samuel A McQuiston; Christopher M Malozzi
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-11-16

4.  Development and application of artificial intelligence in cardiac imaging.

Authors:  Beibei Jiang; Ning Guo; Yinghui Ge; Lu Zhang; Matthijs Oudkerk; Xueqian Xie
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  Multimodality cardiac imaging in the 21st century: evolution, advances and future opportunities for innovation.

Authors:  Melissa A Daubert; Tina Tailor; Olga James; Leslee J Shaw; Pamela S Douglas; Lynne Koweek
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  Cardiac MRI-Update 2020.

Authors:  Anke Busse; Rengarajan Rajagopal; Seyrani Yücel; Ebba Beller; Alper Öner; Felix Streckenbach; Daniel Cantré; Hüseyin Ince; Marc-André Weber; Felix G Meinel
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 7.  Applications of artificial intelligence in cardiovascular imaging.

Authors:  Maxime Sermesant; Hervé Delingette; Hubert Cochet; Pierre Jaïs; Nicholas Ayache
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 32.419

8.  Validation of a deep-learning semantic segmentation approach to fully automate MRI-based left-ventricular deformation analysis in cardiotoxicity.

Authors:  Julia Karr; Michael Cohen; Samuel A McQuiston; Teja Poorsala; Christopher Malozzi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  A deep-learning semantic segmentation approach to fully automated MRI-based left-ventricular deformation analysis in cardiotoxicity.

Authors:  By Julia Kar; Michael V Cohen; Samuel P McQuiston; Christopher M Malozzi
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 2.546

10.  Preparing Medical Imaging Data for Machine Learning.

Authors:  Martin J Willemink; Wojciech A Koszek; Cailin Hardell; Jie Wu; Dominik Fleischmann; Hugh Harvey; Les R Folio; Ronald M Summers; Daniel L Rubin; Matthew P Lungren
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.