| Literature DB >> 36005011 |
Lindsay C Fadel1,2, Ivany V Patel1,3, Jonathan Romero1,4, I-Chih Tan5, Shelli R Kesler6, Vikram Rao6, S A Amali S Subasinghe7, Russell S Ray2, Jason T Yustein8,9,10, Matthew J Allen7, Brian W Gibson1, Justin J Verlinden1,11, Stanley Fayn1,12, Nicole Ruggiero1, Caitlyn Ortiz1,4, Elizabeth Hipskind1,2, Aaron Feng1, Chijindu Iheanacho1, Alex Wang1, Robia G Pautler1,2,4,13,14.
Abstract
Anesthesia is often used in preclinical imaging studies that incorporate mouse or rat models. However, multiple reports indicate that anesthesia has significant physiological impacts. Thus, there has been great interest in performing imaging studies in awake, unanesthetized animals to obtain accurate results without the confounding physiological effects of anesthesia. Here, we describe a newly designed mouse holder that is interfaceable with existing MRI systems and enables awake in vivo mouse imaging. This holder significantly reduces head movement of the awake animal compared to previously designed holders and allows for the acquisition of improved anatomical images. In addition to applications in anatomical T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), we also describe applications in acquiring 31P spectra, manganese-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MEMRI) transport rates and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) in awake animals and describe a successful conditioning paradigm for awake imaging. These data demonstrate significant differences in 31P spectra, MEMRI transport rates, and rs-fMRI connectivity between anesthetized and awake animals, emphasizing the importance of performing functional studies in unanesthetized animals. Furthermore, these studies demonstrate that the mouse holder presented here is easy to construct and use, compatible with standard Bruker systems for mouse imaging, and provides rigorous results in awake mice.Entities:
Keywords: MEMRI; MRI; anesthesia; animal holder; awake; mouse; rs-fMRI
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36005011 PMCID: PMC9406174 DOI: 10.3390/bios12080616
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biosensors (Basel) ISSN: 2079-6374
Figure 1Awake Animal Imaging Holder. A custom mouse holder with nose cone and head brace (A), and mouse holder with tooth bar, respiration monitor, and heat source (B). Image of mouse placed in holder, with nose in nose cone and on tooth bar (C). Image of mouse with limbs taped down and temperature probe inserted (D). Image of mouse fully secured with gauze and tape to reduce all movement during imaging (E). Oxygen was supplied to the subjects through the oxygen hose during imaging and acclimation.
Figure 2Acclimation Chamber. The simulated acclimation core was cut from PVC pipe and measures 600 mm in total length (300 mm for the core and 300 mm for the open extension). The width of the PVC pipe was 80 mm and the entire core was elevated 102 mm off the platform by a steel rack. The core was designed to mimic a small animal MRI core so that animals acclimated using this structure would exhibit lower stress signals and perform fewer and less drastic head movements during scans.
Figure 3Protocol for 5-day acclimation for awake mouse imaging (A–F). Protocol for awake image acquisition (A–E,G). Mice were lightly anesthetized under 0.5–1% isoflurane with a flow rate of 2.5 L/minute for approximately 2 to 3 min (A). Mice were secured into the holder with a continued delivery of 0.5–1% isoflurane and maintained at 37 °C with an air-heating system (B). The mouse holder was slid into coil (C), isoflurane was discontinued, and mice were given 15 min to become fully awake (D). EPI noises, conduct T2 Tripilot, and Anatomy 2b scans were run (E). Mice remained in the MRI for set amount of time based on day of acclimation (physiological responses to stress are monitored throughout) (F). After Day 5 of acclimation T2-weighted imaging was conducted (T2 Tripilot position scan was conducted first and animal was adjusted if necessary), 31P and T1-weighted MEMRI studies were conducted, and rs-fMRI data collected (G).
Figure 4Cortisol levels of naïve (unacclimated) mice (N = 10) compared to cortisol levels of acclimated mice (N = 6) on day 1 and day 5 of the acclimation protocol. Significant increase (p = 0.003, one-way ANOVA) in cortisol levels after day 1 of acclimation, compared to naïve mice. After day 5 of acclimation the cortisol levels were no longer significantly different from baseline (naïve) levels.
Figure 5Highly motion-sensitive T2-weighted axial images of the brains of two mice show the significant reduction of motion and artifacts during the awake MRI imaging process. Anatomical image acquired with previously designed mouse holder (A) vs our newly designed mouse holder (B).
Figure 6Bioenergetic status of the brains of awake and anesthetized mice. Levels of PCr and Pi decreased in anesthetized mice relative to awake mice (A,B). ATP levels in the brain were maintained (C). PCr/ATP levels in awake mice are increased relative to anesthetized mice (D). Increases Pi/ATP levels in awake mice relative to anesthetized mice (E). Increased levels of Pi/PCr in awake mice (F). N = 5 anesthetized and N = 5 awake mice.
Figure 7The mean rate of axonal transport of Mn2+ (signal intensity/time) in the olfactory bulb of anesthetized animals (0.0161) was significantly lower than the mean rate of axonal transport of Mn2+ in the olfactory bulb of awake animals (0.03869). The first two columns labelled “No Mn2+ Anesthetized” and “No Mn2+Awake” do not contain observable signal because no Mn2+was administered to these mice.
Figure 8Functional connectivity matrices for anesthetized (A) and awake (B) mice were highly similar via Mantel test (r = 0.61, p < 0.001). See Supplemental Table S1 for brain regions indicated on X and Y axes. Small-worldness index area under the curve (C) was significantly higher in the awake group (W = 1, p < 0.001). Movement, as measured by root mean squared framewise displacement (D), was below the half in-plane voxel (0.125 mm) and 2 standard deviation (SD) cutoffs for all mice. Motion did not differ significantly between groups (W = 25, p = 0.83). EPI scans are shown for an anesthetized mouse (E) and an awake mouse (F).