| Literature DB >> 36003612 |
Yuan Gao1, Mingxin Jiang1, Liuqingqing Yang1, Zhuo Li1, Fei-Xiang Tian2, Yulian He1,3.
Abstract
Methane (CH4) is one of the cleanest fossil fuel resources and is playing an increasingly indispensable role in our way to carbon neutrality, by providing less carbon-intensive heat and electricity worldwide. On the other hand, the atmospheric concentration of CH4 has raced past 1,900 ppb in 2021, almost triple its pre-industrial levels. As a greenhouse gas at least 86 times as potent as carbon dioxide (CO2) over 20 years, CH4 is becoming a major threat to the global goal of deviating Earth temperature from the +2°C scenario. Consequently, all CH4-powered facilities must be strictly coupled with remediation plans for unburned CH4 in the exhaust to avoid further exacerbating the environmental stress, among which catalytic CH4 combustion (CMC) is one of the most effective strategies to solve this issue. Most current CMC catalysts are noble-metal-based owing to their outstanding C-H bond activation capability, while their high cost and poor thermal stability have driven the search for alternative options, among which transition metal oxide (TMO) catalysts have attracted extensive attention due to their Earth abundance, high thermal stability, variable oxidation states, rich acidic and basic sites, etc. To date, many TMO catalysts have shown comparable catalytic performance with that of noble metals, while their fundamental reaction mechanisms are explored to a much less extent and remain to be controversial, which hinders the further optimization of the TMO catalytic systems. Therefore, in this review, we provide a systematic compilation of the recent research advances in TMO-based CMC reactions, together with their detailed reaction mechanisms. We start with introducing the scientific fundamentals of the CMC reaction itself as well as the unique and desirable features of TMOs applied in CMC, followed by a detailed introduction of four different kinetic reaction models proposed for the reactions. Next, we categorize the TMOs of interests into single and hybrid systems, summarizing their specific morphology characterization, catalytic performance, kinetic properties, with special emphasis on the reaction mechanisms and interfacial properties. Finally, we conclude the review with a summary and outlook on the TMOs for practical CMC applications. In addition, we also further prospect the enormous potentials of TMOs in producing value-added chemicals beyond combustion, such as direct partial oxidation to methanol.Entities:
Keywords: catalytic combustion; heterogeneous catalysis; methane; reaction mechanism; transition metal oxide
Year: 2022 PMID: 36003612 PMCID: PMC9393236 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2022.959422
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.545
FIGURE 1The reaction rate of CMC as a function of temperature. Reprinted with permission from He L. et al. (2020). Copyright (2020) Elsevier.
FIGURE 2The reaction mechanism diagram of CMC.
FIGURE 3The proposed reaction pathways based on the E–R mechanism for Ni-poor spinel oxides and MvK mechanism for Ni-rich spinel oxides. Cited from Wang H. W. et al. (2019).
The catalytic performances of different TMOs for CMC.
| TMOs | Preparation method | Surface area (m2 g−1) | Light-off temperature (°C) | Ea (kJ mol−1) | Feed composition and GHSV/WHSV (gas/weight hourly space velocity) | Stability | Reaction mechanism | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Co3O4 | basic precipitation | 14 | T50 = 330 | 74 ± 2 | 1% CH4, 10% O2 and 89% N2 GHSV: 60,000 h−1 | anti-H2O: good (reversible deactivation) anti-SO2: none | MvK |
|
| Co-In-0.2 oxide | a designed precipitation | 57.3 | T10 = 265 | 82.2 | 1% CH4, 10% O2, N2 (balance); GHSV = 48,000 ml g−1 h−1 | anti-H2O: excellent (fully restored) anti-SO2:: none | none |
|
| T99 = 395 | ||||||||
| N-Co3O4-110 | a facial N2 plasma engraving | 52.3 | T50 = 342 | 73.0 | 2 vol. % CH4, 20 vol. % O2, 5 vol. % H2O, Ar gas; WHSV = 46,800 ml g−1 h−1 | anti-H2O: good (reduced by about 3%) anti-SO2:: none | May be MvK |
|
| T90 = 412 | ||||||||
| Co3O4/Ce0.75Zr0.25 | solution combustion synthesis | none | T50 = 217 (with electric field) | 35.8 (with electric field) | [CH4] = 0.2%, [O2] = 10%, N2 (balance gas); GHSV = 30,000 h−1 | none | MvK |
|
| Mesoporous Co3O4 | Calcining | 136.2 | T10 = 220 | none | 1% CH4, 20% O2; space velocity = 18,000 ml g−1 h−1 | none | E-R |
|
| T50 = 270 | ||||||||
| Zr-Doped NiO | homogeneous co-precipitation strategy | 142 | T90 = 380 | 55.27 | 1 vol% CH4, 10 vol% O2, balanced N2 GHSV: 30,000 ml g−1 h−1 | anti-H2O: good anti-SO2: none | MvK |
|
| Ni-Cu mixed oxides | co-precipitation method | 147 | T50 = 370 | 89 | 1 vol% CH4, 5 vol% O2 and N2 GHSV: 50 000 ml g−1 h−1 | anti-H2O: good anti-SO2: none | MvK |
|
| T90 = 410 | ||||||||
| Mn-Ce-RP | redox-precipitation method | none | T50 = 446°C | none | CH4(1%)/O2(10%)/N2 WSHV = 30,000 ml/(g*h) | anti-SO2: excellent anti-H2O: none | MvK |
|
| nanocubic MnO2 | a hydrothermal process | 78 | T50 = 293 | none | none | none | L- H |
|
| T90 = 350 | ||||||||
| α-MnO2 | a hydrothermal | 92.9 | T50 = 356 | none | 0.1% CH4 in air WHSV = 90 L g−1 h−1 | none | MvK |
|
| T90 = 463 | ||||||||
| MnO2/ZrO2 | one-pot hydrothermal | none | T50 = 340 | none | 1,000 ppm CH4, 10% O2, and N2 (balance) WHSV = 45 L g−1 h−1 | anti-H2O: good anti-SO2: good | none |
|
| Nano-ZnCr2O4 spinel oxides | a ethylene glycol-mediated solvothermal | 96.2 | T10 = 300 | 144.8 | 2 vol% CH4, 20 vol% O2, 78 vol% N2 GHSV = 78,000 h−1 | none | L-H |
|
| T90 = 400 | ||||||||
| Sn-Cr binary oxide | a co-current co-precipitation | 133 | T10 = 320 | none | 1.0% CH4 in air; space velocity = 20,000 h−1 | none | MvK |
|
| T50 = 400 | ||||||||
| T90 = 490 | ||||||||
| Fe and Cr-based oxides | the citrate sol–gel | 82 | T450°C = 79% | none | 347 ppm CH4+5.1 ppm SO2 | anti-H2O: good anti-SO2: excellent | none |
|
| Fe60Cr40 | T550°C = 97% | |||||||
| Bulk α-Fe2O3 | precipitation | none | T50 = 461 | 99.9 | 2000 ppm V CH4 in air | none | MvK (100–500°C) |
|
| Nano sheetα-Fe2O3 | hard-templating | none | T10 = 230 | 17.60 | 5% CH4 and 20% O2 balanced with 75% Ar; WHSV = 10 000 ml g−1 h−1 | none | MvK (below 400°C) |
|
| T50 = 394 | ||||||||
| NiO/CeO2 | Deposition precipitation | none | T50 = 465 | 69.4 ± 4.0 | 20 ml/min 10% CH4/Ar and 10 ml/min pure O2 WHSV = 18 000 ml g−1 h−1 | anti-H2O: good anti-SO2: none | MvK |
|
| MnCeOx (Mn-to-Ce ratio of 1:3) | redox | none | T50 = 475 | 113 | CH4/O2/He mixture (concentration: 1/4/95); Space velocity = 30,000 h−1 | none | MvK |
|
| T100 = 700 | ||||||||
| Ce0.9Zr0.06Sc0.04O1.98 | citrate complexation | none | T50 = 700 | 124.3 | 1 vol% CH4, 8 vol% O2 and 91 vol% N2 | none | MvK |
|
FIGURE 4Schematic diagram of the whole catalytic cycle of CMC over Co3O4 (110) following the optimal reaction mechanism. Reprinted with permission from Hu et al. (2016). Copyright (2016) American Chemical Society.
FIGURE 5Reaction pathway of CMC over Cu–Ni oxide. Cited from Fan et al. (2022).
FIGURE 6Reaction pathway for methane combustion over Ni1−xZrxO2−δ catalysts. Reprinted with permission from Wang et al. (2021). Copyright (2021) American Chemical Society.
FIGURE 7Catalytic stability for methane catalytic combustion of the MnO2 catalyst under different feed compositions. Reprinted with permission from Akbari et al. (2021). Copyright (2021) American Chemical Society.
FIGURE 8SO2-poisoning mechanism over MnCe-CP (A) and MnCe-RP (B). Cited from Zhong et al. (2019).
FIGURE 9Proposed poisoning mechanisms at 450°C under (A) sulfur-free conditions, (B) dry conditions, and (C) wet conditions. Cited from García-Vázquez et al. (2020).
FIGURE 10Schematic briefly showing activations of C–H of CH4 and O−O of O2 and coupling between CHx species and atomic oxygen at the interface of NiO/CeO2. Reprinted with permission from Zhang et al. (2018). Copyright (2018) American Chemical Society.
FIGURE 11Cartoon depiction of methane combustion catalyzed by CuO (A) and Cu/CeO2 (B). Reprinted with permission from Lu et al. (2016). Copyright (2016) American Chemical Society.
FIGURE 12(A) Clean (001); (B) CH4 physical adsorption; (C) CH4 dissociative adsorption; (D) CH2* with oxygen vacancy (OV) presented; (E) CH2* with O2 adsorbed; (F) CH2* rotating and interacting with O2*; (G) transition state (TS) state COH2*; (H) CHO* + H*; (I) CO* with OV presented after releasing one H2O; (J) CO* with O2 adsorbed; (K) TS for O transfer to CO*; (L) CO2 physical adsorbed. Cu, O, C, and H are shown as rose-carmine, red, grey and white spheres, respectively. Reprinted with permission from Kong et al. (2018). Copyright (2018) Beilstein-Institut.