Matthew O Ross1, Amy C Rosenzweig2. 1. Departments of Molecular Biosciences and of Chemistry, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 60208, USA. 2. Departments of Molecular Biosciences and of Chemistry, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 60208, USA. amyr@northwestern.edu.
Abstract
Methane monooxygenase (MMO) enzymes activate O2 for oxidation of methane. Two distinct MMOs exist in nature, a soluble form that uses a diiron active site (sMMO) and a membrane-bound form with a catalytic copper center (pMMO). Understanding the reaction mechanisms of these enzymes is of fundamental importance to biologists and chemists, and is also relevant to the development of new biocatalysts. The sMMO catalytic cycle has been elucidated in detail, including O2 activation intermediates and the nature of the methane-oxidizing species. By contrast, many aspects of pMMO catalysis remain unclear, most notably the nuclearity and molecular details of the copper active site. Here, we review the current state of knowledge for both enzymes, and consider pMMO O2 activation intermediates suggested by computational and synthetic studies in the context of existing biochemical data. Further work is needed on all fronts, with the ultimate goal of understanding how these two remarkable enzymes catalyze a reaction not readily achieved by any other metalloenzyme or biomimetic compound.
Methane monon class="Chemical">oxygenase (MMO) enzymes activate O2 for oxidation of methane. Two distinct MMOs exist in nature, a soluble form that uses a diiron active site (sMMO) and a membrane-bound form with a catalytic copper center (pMMO). Understanding the reaction mechanisms of these enzymes is of fundamental importance to biologists and chemists, and is also relevant to the development of new biocatalysts. The sMMO catalytic cycle has been elucidated in detail, including O2 activation intermediates and the nature of the methane-oxidizing species. By contrast, many aspects of pMMO catalysis remain unclear, most notably the nuclearity and molecular details of the copper active site. Here, we review the current state of knowledge for both enzymes, and consider pMMO O2 activation intermediates suggested by computational and synthetic studies in the context of existing biochemical data. Further work is needed on all fronts, with the ultimate goal of understanding how these two remarkable enzymes catalyze a reaction not readily achieved by any other metalloenzyme or biomimetic compound.
Authors: Edward I Solomon; David E Heppner; Esther M Johnston; Jake W Ginsbach; Jordi Cirera; Munzarin Qayyum; Matthew T Kieber-Emmons; Christian H Kjaergaard; Ryan G Hadt; Li Tian Journal: Chem Rev Date: 2014-03-03 Impact factor: 60.622
Authors: Maarten Merkx; Daniel A. Kopp; Matthew H. Sazinsky; Jessica L. Blazyk; Jens Müller; Stephen J. Lippard Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2001-08-03 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Arjan Pol; Klaas Heijmans; Harry R Harhangi; Dario Tedesco; Mike S M Jetten; Huub J M Op den Camp Journal: Nature Date: 2007-11-14 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: George E Cutsail; Rahul Banerjee; Ang Zhou; Lawrence Que; John D Lipscomb; Serena DeBeer Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2018-11-16 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Soo Y Ro; Matthew O Ross; Yue Wen Deng; Sharon Batelu; Thomas J Lawton; Joseph D Hurley; Timothy L Stemmler; Brian M Hoffman; Amy C Rosenzweig Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2018-05-08 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Matthew O Ross; Fraser MacMillan; Jingzhou Wang; Alex Nisthal; Thomas J Lawton; Barry D Olafson; Stephen L Mayo; Amy C Rosenzweig; Brian M Hoffman Journal: Science Date: 2019-05-10 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Wouter Versantvoort; Arjan Pol; Mike S M Jetten; Laura van Niftrik; Joachim Reimann; Boran Kartal; Huub J M Op den Camp Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-09-10 Impact factor: 11.205