Literature DB >> 36002711

Investigation of the Predictive Factors of Diminished Ovarian Reserve in Women Aged Less Than 40 Years and Undergoing ICSI Cycle.

Mohammed M Laqqan1, Maged M Yassin2.   

Abstract

Diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) is one of the primary causes of poor ICSI outcomes. Therefore, this study was performed to speculate which of the following parameters: AMH, AFC, and women's age can be used as a predictor factor of the DOR in women aged < 40 years. This prospective study enrolled 500 women suffering from idiopathic infertility problems and who underwent GnRH antagonist multiple-dose stimulation protocol. The women were divided into two groups: normal fertility (FSH ≤ 10 mIU/mL, n = 300) and DOR (FSH > 10 mIU/mL, n = 200). At the time of the study, the average of women age was 29.3 ± 5.7 years. A significant reduction was found in AMH level, AFC, number of mature, immature oocytes, fertilized oocytes, embryos transferred, and β-hCG level in the DOR group compared to the normal fertility group (P < 0.001). Conversely, a significant increase was shown in the age of the DOR group compared to the normal fertility group (30.8 ± 5.8 vs. 28.2 ± 5.4, respectively; P < 0.001). A significant negative association was found between the AFC, the number of mature oocytes, fertilized oocytes, embryos transferred, and the basal level of FSH in the DOR group (P < 0.01). The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) demonstrated that AMH level and AFC had the highest accuracy, followed by age in the prediction of DOR (P < 0.001) with a cut-off value of ≤ 1.2 ng/mL, ≤ 4.5, and > 29.5 years, respectively. This study exhibited that the levels of AMH and AFC are the best biomarkers, followed by age for the prediction of DOR in women < 40 years old. Furthermore, AMH is the only independent factor that is significantly related to DOR in women.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Society for Reproductive Investigation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AFC; AMH; Age; DOR; Low fecundity

Year:  2022        PMID: 36002711     DOI: 10.1007/s43032-022-01055-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Sci        ISSN: 1933-7191            Impact factor:   2.924


  42 in total

1.  Assessment of reproductive ageing patterns by hormonal and ultrasonographic ovarian reserve tests.

Authors:  E Tufan; K Elter; F Durmusoglu
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-09-23       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Diminished ovarian reserve in the United States assisted reproductive technology population: diagnostic trends among 181,536 cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System.

Authors:  Kate Devine; Sunni L Mumford; Mae Wu; Alan H DeCherney; Micah J Hill; Anthony Propst
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 3.  The time is now for a new approach to primary ovarian insufficiency.

Authors:  Amber R Cooper; Valerie L Baker; Evelina W Sterling; Mary E Ryan; Teresa K Woodruff; Lawrence M Nelson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 4.  Genetic associations with diminished ovarian reserve: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Alexis D Greene; George Patounakis; James H Segars
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Reproductive outcome in patients with diminished ovarian reserve.

Authors:  A J Levi; M F Raynault; P A Bergh; M R Drews; B T Miller; R T Scott
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Serum antimullerian hormone levels best reflect the reproductive decline with age in normal women with proven fertility: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Ilse A J van Rooij; Frank J M Broekmans; Gabrielle J Scheffer; Caspar W N Looman; J Dik F Habbema; Frank H de Jong; Bart J C M Fauser; Axel P N Themmen; Egbert R te Velde
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Young age does not protect against the adverse effects of reduced ovarian reserve--an eight year study.

Authors:  Tarek El-Toukhy; Yacoub Khalaf; Roger Hart; Alison Taylor; Peter Braude
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 8.  A new approach to ovarian reserve testing.

Authors:  Wenjie Sun; Barbara J Stegmann; Melinda Henne; William H Catherino; James H Segars
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  An elevated basal FSH reflects a quantitative rather than qualitative decline of the ovarian reserve.

Authors:  H Abdalla; M Y Thum
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-03-11       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 10.  Reproductive ovarian testing and the alphabet soup of diagnoses: DOR, POI, POF, POR, and FOR.

Authors:  Lisa M Pastore; Mindy S Christianson; James Stelling; William G Kearns; James H Segars
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.