OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess which of the basal ovarian reserve markers provides the best reflection of the changes occurring in ovarian function over time (i.e., reproductive aging). DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal study. SETTING: Healthy volunteers in an academic research center. PATIENT(S): Eighty-one women with normal reproductive performance during the course of their lives were longitudinally assessed. In this select group of women, becoming chronologically older was considered as a proxy variable for becoming older from a reproductive point of view. INTERVENTION(S): The women were assessed twice, with on average a 4-year interval (T(1) and T(2)). The number of antral follicles on ultrasound (AFC) and blood levels of antimullerian hormone (AMH), FSH, inhibin B, and E(2) were assessed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Longitudinal changes of the markers mentioned and the consistency of these parameters over time. RESULT(S): The mean ages at T(1) and T(2) were 39.6 and 43.6 years, respectively. Although AFC was strongly associated with age in a cross-sectional fashion, it did not change over time. The AMH, FSH, and inhibin B levels showed a significant change over time, in contrast to E(2) levels. The AMH and AFC were highly correlated with age both at T(1) and T(2), whereas FSH and inhibin B predominantly changed in women more than 40 years of age. To assess the consistency of these parameters over time, we investigated whether a woman's individual level above or below the mean of her age group at T(1) remained above or below the mean of her age group at T(2). Serum AMH concentrations showed the best consistency, with AFC as second best. The FSH and inhibin B showed only modest consistency, whereas E(2) showed no consistency at all. CONCLUSION(S): These results indicate that serum AMH represents the best endocrine marker to assess the age-related decline of reproductive capacity.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess which of the basal ovarian reserve markers provides the best reflection of the changes occurring in ovarian function over time (i.e., reproductive aging). DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal study. SETTING: Healthy volunteers in an academic research center. PATIENT(S): Eighty-one women with normal reproductive performance during the course of their lives were longitudinally assessed. In this select group of women, becoming chronologically older was considered as a proxy variable for becoming older from a reproductive point of view. INTERVENTION(S): The women were assessed twice, with on average a 4-year interval (T(1) and T(2)). The number of antral follicles on ultrasound (AFC) and blood levels of antimullerian hormone (AMH), FSH, inhibin B, and E(2) were assessed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Longitudinal changes of the markers mentioned and the consistency of these parameters over time. RESULT(S): The mean ages at T(1) and T(2) were 39.6 and 43.6 years, respectively. Although AFC was strongly associated with age in a cross-sectional fashion, it did not change over time. The AMH, FSH, and inhibin B levels showed a significant change over time, in contrast to E(2) levels. The AMH and AFC were highly correlated with age both at T(1) and T(2), whereas FSH and inhibin B predominantly changed in women more than 40 years of age. To assess the consistency of these parameters over time, we investigated whether a woman's individual level above or below the mean of her age group at T(1) remained above or below the mean of her age group at T(2). Serum AMH concentrations showed the best consistency, with AFC as second best. The FSH and inhibin B showed only modest consistency, whereas E(2) showed no consistency at all. CONCLUSION(S): These results indicate that serum AMH represents the best endocrine marker to assess the age-related decline of reproductive capacity.
Authors: Megan E B Clowse; Susannah C Copland; Tsung-Cheng Hsieh; Shein-Chung Chow; Gary S Hoffman; Peter A Merkel; Robert F Spiera; John C Davis; W Joseph McCune; Steven R Ytterberg; E William St Clair; Nancy B Allen; Ulrich Specks; John H Stone Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Siobán D Harlow; Margery Gass; Janet E Hall; Roger Lobo; Pauline Maki; Robert W Rebar; Sherry Sherman; Patrick M Sluss; Tobie J de Villiers Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2012-02-16 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Michael Bonifacio; Cara K Bradley; Sonal Karia; Mark Livingstone; Mark C Bowman; Steven J McArthur Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2015-10-14 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Wenzhen Ge; Tess V Clendenen; Yelena Afanasyeva; Karen L Koenig; Claudia Agnoli; Louise A Brinton; Joanne F Dorgan; A Heather Eliassen; Roni T Falk; Göran Hallmans; Susan E Hankinson; Judith Hoffman-Bolton; Timothy J Key; Vittorio Krogh; Hazel B Nichols; Dale P Sandler; Minouk J Schoemaker; Patrick M Sluss; Malin Sund; Anthony J Swerdlow; Kala Visvanathan; Mengling Liu; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2018-02-08 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Bruno Ramalho de Carvalho; Ana Carolina Japur de Sá Rosa e Silva; Júlio César Rosa e Silva; Rosana Maria dos Reis; Rui Alberto Ferriani; Marcos Felipe Silva de Sá Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2008-08-05 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Monika L Metzger; Lillian R Meacham; Briana Patterson; Jacqueline S Casillas; Louis S Constine; Nobuko Hijiya; Lisa B Kenney; Marcia Leonard; Barbara A Lockart; Wendy Likes; Daniel M Green Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-02-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Stephanie J Estes; Bin Ye; Weiliang Qiu; Daniel Cramer; Mark D Hornstein; Stacey A Missmer Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2008-11-05 Impact factor: 7.329