Literature DB >> 36001280

The position of renal denervation in treatment of hypertension: an expert consensus statement.

V J M Zeijen1, A A Kroon2, B H van den Born3, P J Blankestijn4, S C A Meijvis4, A Nap5, E Lipsic6, A Elvan7, J Versmissen8, R J van Geuns9, M Voskuil10, P A L Tonino11, W Spiering12, J Deinum13, J Daemen14.   

Abstract

Hypertension is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease. In the Netherlands, there are approximately 2.8 million people with hypertension. Despite treatment recommendations including lifestyle changes and antihypertensive drugs, most patients do not meet guideline-recommended blood pressure (BP) targets. In order to improve BP control and lower the risk of subsequent cardiovascular events, renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) has been introduced and studied as a non-pharmacological approach. While early data on the efficacy of RDN showed conflicting results, improvements in treatment protocols and study design resulted in robust new evidence supporting the potential of the technology to improve patient care in hypertensive subjects. Recently, 5 randomised sham-controlled trials demonstrated the safety and efficacy of the technology. Modelling studies have further shown that RDN is cost-effective in the Dutch healthcare setting. Given the undisputable disease burden along with the shortcomings of current therapeutic options, we postulate a new, clearly framed indication for RDN as an adjunct in the treatment of hypertension. The present consensus statement summarises current guideline-recommended BP targets, proposed workup and treatment for hypertension, and position of RDN for those patients with primary hypertension who do not meet guideline-recommended BP targets (see central illustration).
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Consensus; Hypertension; Netherlands; Patient care; Sympathectomy

Year:  2022        PMID: 36001280     DOI: 10.1007/s12471-022-01717-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neth Heart J        ISSN: 1568-5888            Impact factor:   2.854


  68 in total

1.  Global and regional effects of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with acute stroke in 32 countries (INTERSTROKE): a case-control study.

Authors:  Martin J O'Donnell; Siu Lim Chin; Sumathy Rangarajan; Denis Xavier; Lisheng Liu; Hongye Zhang; Purnima Rao-Melacini; Xiaohe Zhang; Prem Pais; Steven Agapay; Patricio Lopez-Jaramillo; Albertino Damasceno; Peter Langhorne; Matthew J McQueen; Annika Rosengren; Mahshid Dehghan; Graeme J Hankey; Antonio L Dans; Ahmed Elsayed; Alvaro Avezum; Charles Mondo; Hans-Christoph Diener; Danuta Ryglewicz; Anna Czlonkowska; Nana Pogosova; Christian Weimar; Romaina Iqbal; Rafael Diaz; Khalid Yusoff; Afzalhussein Yusufali; Aytekin Oguz; Xingyu Wang; Ernesto Penaherrera; Fernando Lanas; Okechukwu S Ogah; Adesola Ogunniyi; Helle K Iversen; German Malaga; Zvonko Rumboldt; Shahram Oveisgharan; Fawaz Al Hussain; Daliwonga Magazi; Yongchai Nilanont; John Ferguson; Guillaume Pare; Salim Yusuf
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension.

Authors:  Bryan Williams; Giuseppe Mancia; Wilko Spiering; Enrico Agabiti Rosei; Michel Azizi; Michel Burnier; Denis L Clement; Antonio Coca; Giovanni de Simone; Anna Dominiczak; Thomas Kahan; Felix Mahfoud; Josep Redon; Luis Ruilope; Alberto Zanchetti; Mary Kerins; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Reinhold Kreutz; Stephane Laurent; Gregory Y H Lip; Richard McManus; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Frank Ruschitzka; Roland E Schmieder; Evgeny Shlyakhto; Costas Tsioufis; Victor Aboyans; Ileana Desormais
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 3.  Effects of blood pressure lowering on outcome incidence in hypertension. 1. Overview, meta-analyses, and meta-regression analyses of randomized trials.

Authors:  Costas Thomopoulos; Gianfranco Parati; Alberto Zanchetti
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.844

Review 4.  Blood pressure lowering for prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dena Ettehad; Connor A Emdin; Amit Kiran; Simon G Anderson; Thomas Callender; Jonathan Emberson; John Chalmers; Anthony Rodgers; Kazem Rahimi
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Adequacy of blood pressure control in high-risk hypertensive patients: The DEGREE study.

Authors:  Victor J M Zeijen; Melvin Lafeber; Jorie Versmissen; Abraham A Kroon; Eric Boersma; Joost Daemen
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 4.164

6.  Global Disparities of Hypertension Prevalence and Control: A Systematic Analysis of Population-Based Studies From 90 Countries.

Authors:  Katherine T Mills; Joshua D Bundy; Tanika N Kelly; Jennifer E Reed; Patricia M Kearney; Kristi Reynolds; Jing Chen; Jiang He
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study.

Authors:  Salim Yusuf; Steven Hawken; Stephanie Ounpuu; Tony Dans; Alvaro Avezum; Fernando Lanas; Matthew McQueen; Andrzej Budaj; Prem Pais; John Varigos; Liu Lisheng
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004 Sep 11-17       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control in Adults 80 Years or Older: A Secondary Analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.

Authors:  Nicholas M Pajewski; Dan R Berlowitz; Adam P Bress; Kathryn E Callahan; Alfred K Cheung; Larry J Fine; Sarah A Gaussoin; Karen C Johnson; Jordan King; Dalane W Kitzman; John B Kostis; Alan J Lerner; Cora E Lewis; Suzanne Oparil; Mahboob Rahman; David M Reboussin; Michael V Rocco; Joni K Snyder; Carolyn Still; Mark A Supiano; Virginia G Wadley; Paul K Whelton; Jackson T Wright; Jeff D Williamson
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  Achievement of treatment goals for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in clinical practice across Europe: the EURIKA study.

Authors:  José R Banegas; Esther López-García; Jean Dallongeville; Eliseo Guallar; Julian P Halcox; Claudio Borghi; Elvira L Massó-González; Francisco J Jiménez; Joep Perk; Philippe Gabriel Steg; Guy De Backer; Fernando Rodríguez-Artalejo
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 10.  Nonadherence to antihypertensive drugs: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tadesse Melaku Abegaz; Abdulla Shehab; Eyob Alemayehu Gebreyohannes; Akshaya Srikanth Bhagavathula; Asim Ahmed Elnour
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.