| Literature DB >> 36000612 |
J B Netto1, E S A Melo1, A G S Oliveira2, L R Sousa1, L R Santiago1, D M Santos1, R C R Chagas1, A S Gonçalves3,4, R G Thomé5, H B Santos5, R M Reis6,7,8, R I M A Ribeiro1.
Abstract
Glioblastoma is the most prevalent and malignant brain tumor identified in adults. Surgical resection followed by radiotherapy and chemotherapy, mainly with temozolomide (TMZ), is the chosen treatment for this type of tumor. However, the average survival of patients is around 15 months. Novel approaches to glioblastoma treatment are greatly needed. Here, we aimed to investigate the anti-glioblastoma effect of the combination of matteucinol (Mat) (dihydroxyflavanone derived from Miconia chamissois Naudin) with the chemotherapeutic TMZ in vitro using tumor (U-251MG) and normal astrocyte (NHA) cell lines and in vivo using the chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay. The combination was cytotoxic and selective for tumor cells (28 μg/mL Mat and 9.71 μg/mL TMZ). Additionally, the combination did not alter cell adhesion but caused morphological changes characteristic of apoptosis in vitro. Notably, the combination was also able to reduce tumor growth in the chick embryo model (CAM assay). The docking results showed that Mat was the best ligand to the cell death membrane receptor TNFR1 and to TNFR1/TMZ complex, suggesting that these two molecules may be working together increasing their potential. In conclusion, Mat-TMZ can be a good candidate for pharmacokinetic studies in view of clinical use for the treatment of glioblastoma.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36000612 PMCID: PMC9394692 DOI: 10.1590/1414-431X2022e12076
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Med Biol Res ISSN: 0100-879X Impact factor: 2.904
Figure 13D structure of TNFR1 with gridbox used for docking simulations. TNFR: tumor necrosis factor receptor.
Figure 2Tumor (U251) and normal (NHA) cell viability after 72 h of treatment with matteucinol-temozolomide (Mat-TMZ) (28 μg/mL Mat and 9.71 μg/mL TMZ). The assay was performed in experimental triplicates and two independent experiments. The negative control used was 1% DMSO. Data are reported as means±SD. ***P=0.0003 (Student's t-test). ns: not significant.
Figure 3A, Fluorescence morphological assay using acridine orange and propidium iodide in U251 cell line after treatment with matteucinol-temozolomide (Mat-TMZ) (28 μg/mL Mat and 9.71 μg/mL TMZ). The assay was performed in experimental duplicates and two independent experiments. The negative control was 1% DMSO. B, Number of viable and dead cells in the U251 cell line. Data are reported as means±SD. *P=0.0185; **P=0.0066 (Student's t-test). ns: not significant. VC: viable cells; EA: early apoptotic cells; CC: chromatin condensation; BL: cell membrane blubbing; AB: apoptotic body; LA: late apoptotic cells; SN: secondary necrotic cell.
Figure 4Docking energy for each protein/ligand complex. Mat: matteucinol; TMZ: temozolomide.
Figure 5Two binding sites between TNFR1 (tumor necrosis factor receptor), matteucinol (Mat), and temozolomide (TMZ) with their docking energy.
Figure 62D interaction map of matteucinol (Mat), temozolomide (TMZ), and tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR1).
Figure 7Change in tumor area in vivo in the chorioallantoic membrane assay after treatment with matteucinol-temozolomide (Mat-TMZ). A, Representative images of the control and treated group on the 14th and 17th days. B, Tumor area was measured in square pixels. Data are reported as mean percent tumor growth ± SD. *P=0.0238 (Student's t-test).