| Literature DB >> 35999498 |
Hua-Lei Yang1, Zhi-Yun Li2, Shuo Zhang3, Si-Meng Cheng1, Yuan-Yang Wu4, Si-Qing Zhang1, Jia-Hao Wang1, Yi-Wen Tao1, Yi-Dan Yao1, Lin Xie5, Wen-Jing Xiao1, Xiao-Qing Tang1, Jing Wu1, Zheng Shen6, Li-Li Tang7.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the role of social participation in the relationship between internet use and depressive symptoms among Chinese older adults and investigate how the internet use interact with social participation to reduce the risk of depressive symptoms.Entities:
Keywords: Depression; Internet use; Older people; Social participation
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35999498 PMCID: PMC9398499 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-03359-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Geriatr ISSN: 1471-2318 Impact factor: 4.070
Fig. 1Flow chart of the study population selection process
Variable description
| Variable | Variable definition and assignment |
|---|---|
| Dependent variable | |
| CES-D score (Depressive status) | continuous variable (CES-D score range 10 to 40) the higher the score, the more serious the depression. |
| Independent variable | |
| Internet use | yes = 1, no = 0 |
| Control variables | |
| Gender | man = 1, woman = 0 |
| Age | actual age at the time of interview survey year - respondent’s year of birth |
| Education level | primary school and below =1, junior high school = 2 senior high school = 3, higher education = 4 |
| Marital status | married = 1, separated, single, divorced or widowed = 0 |
| Smoking status | yes = 1, no = 0 |
| Drinking status | yes = 1, no = 0 |
| Residence | urban = 1, rural = 0 |
| Religious belief | yes = 1, no = 0 |
| Political status | the Chinese Communist party member = 1, other = 0 |
| Air quality status | completely satisfied = 5, very satisfied = 4, somewhat satistied = 3, not very satisfied = 2, not at all satisfied = 1 |
| Medical insurance | covered medical insurance = 1, without medical insurance = 0 |
| Mediating variable | |
| Social capital | Standardized social capital index |
Basic descriptive statistics
| Varname | Mean | Mean-Diff | T value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Not using the Internet ( | Using the Internet ( | |||
| CES-D score | 19.268 | 19.548 | 15.637 | 3.912*** | 10.013 |
| Gender | 0.223 | 0.215 | 0.318 | −0.103*** | −4.354 |
| Age | 68.168 | 68.333 | 66.024 | 2.309*** | 6.607 |
| Education level | 1.374 | 1.294 | 2.408 | −1.114*** | −27.448 |
| Marital status | 0.785 | 0.780 | 0.841 | −0.060*** | −2.588 |
| Smoking status | 0.072 | 0.068 | 0.123 | −0.055*** | −3.781 |
| Drinking status | 0.205 | 0.192 | 0.366 | −0.174*** | −7.632 |
| Residence | 0.315 | 0.278 | 0.790 | −0.511*** | −20.188 |
| Religious belief | 0.131 | 0.133 | 0.108 | 0.025 | 1.279 |
| Political status | 0.085 | 0.068 | 0.297 | −0.229*** | −14.776 |
| Air quality status | 3.192 | 3.216 | 2.883 | 0.333*** | 7.143 |
| Medical insurance | 0.974 | 0.972 | 0.994 | −0.022** | −2.400 |
| Social capital | 0.052 | −0.013 | 0.904 | −0.918*** | −15.933 |
Note: * p < 0.10, ** p < 0.05, *** p < 0.01
Baseline regression results
| Variable | Model 1 | Model 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Internet use | −3.912*** | − 1.800*** |
| (0.294) | (0.332) | |
| Gender | −1.715*** | |
| (0.254) | ||
| Age | −0.005 | |
| (0.017) | ||
| Education level | −0.913*** | |
| (0.138) | ||
| Marital status | −1.282*** | |
| (0.260) | ||
| Smoking status | 1.119*** | |
| (0.372) | ||
| Drinking status | −0.995*** | |
| (0.238) | ||
| Residence | −2.146*** | |
| (0.230) | ||
| Religious belief | −0.773*** | |
| (0.287) | ||
| Political status | −0.458 | |
| (0.348) | ||
| Air quality status | −1.312*** | |
| (0.126) | ||
| Medical insurance | 0.253 | |
| (0.563) | ||
| 4645 | 4645 | |
| 0.021 | 0.103 |
Note: Standard errors in brackets, * p < 0.1, ** p < 0.05, *** p < 0.01
Balance test
| Variable | Mean | %bias | T-test | V(T)/V(C) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treated | Control | t | P> | t | | |||
| Gender | 0.312 | 0.312 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.000 | . |
| Age | 66.095 | 66.422 | −5.60 | −0.75 | 0.453 | 0.88 |
| Education level | 2.379 | 2.388 | −1.00 | −0.11 | 0.916 | 0.78* |
| Marital status | 0.838 | 0.872 | −8.60 | −1.22 | 0.223 | . |
| Smoking status | 0.122 | 0.104 | 6.30 | 0.74 | 0.460 | |
| Drinking status | 0.358 | 0.321 | 8.30 | 0.99 | 0.322 | |
| Residence | 0.786 | 0.807 | −5.00 | −0.68 | 0.497 | |
| Religious belief | 0.107 | 0.104 | 0.90 | 0.13 | 0.899 | |
| Political status | 0.284 | 0.300 | −4.10 | −0.43 | 0.668 | |
| Air quality status | 2.899 | 2.884 | 1.90 | 0.25 | 0.801 | 0.98 |
| Medical insurance | 0.994 | 0.994 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.000 | . |
Note: * p < 0.1, ** p < 0.05, *** p < 0.01
PSM estimation results
| Matching method | Treatment group | Control group | ATT | Bootstrap standard error | T value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K-nearest neighbor matching | 15.661 | 17.439 | −1.779*** | 0.446 | −3.40 |
| Radius matching | 15.666 | 17.432 | −1.766*** | 0.363 | −4.51 |
| K-nearest neighbor matching in caliper | 15.666 | 17.456 | −1.790*** | 0.514 | −3.42 |
| Kernel matching | 15.661 | 17.536 | −1.875*** | 0.322 | −5.05 |
| Local linear regression matching | 15.661 | 17.519 | −1.858*** | 0.365 | −3.55 |
Note: * p < 0.10, ** p < 0.05, *** p < 0.01; K = 1; standard error after matching is obtained by bootstrap method
Estimation results of heterogeneity analysis
| Variable | Age | Gender | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | Model 6 | Model 7 | |
| Age = 60–69 | Age = 70–79 | Age ≥ 80 | Man | Woman | |
| Internet use | −1.606*** | −2.402*** | 0.607 | −1.552*** | − 1.837*** |
| (0.391) | (0.711) | (1.823) | (0.515) | (0.419) | |
| Control variable | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 3020 | 1345 | 280 | 1035 | 3610 | |
| 0.094 | 0.126 | 0.131 | 0.089 | 0.088 | |
| Variable | Education | Residence | |||
| Model 8 | Model 9 | Model 10 | Model 11 | Model 12 | |
| Primary school and below | Junior middle school | High school and above | Urban | Rural | |
| Internet use | −2.316*** | −1.453** | −1.687*** | −1.569*** | −2.655*** |
| (0.619) | (0.574) | (0.543) | (0.371) | (0.728) | |
| Control variable | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 3548 | 648 | 449 | 1463 | 3182 | |
| 0.071 | 0.092 | 0.076 | 0.081 | 0.075 | |
Note: * p < 0.10, ** p < 0.05, *** p < 0.01; standard errors are reported in parentheses
Estimation results of mediation mechanism analysis
| Variable | Model 13 | Model 14 | Model 15 |
|---|---|---|---|
| CES-D score | Social capital | CES-D score | |
| Internet use | −1.800*** | 0.638*** | −1.450*** |
| (0.332) | (0.087) | (0.333) | |
| Social capital | −0.549*** | ||
| (0.090) | |||
| Control variable | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 4645 | 4645 | 4645 | |
| 0.103 | 0.081 | 0.109 |
Note: * p < 0.10, ** p < 0.05, *** p < 0.01; standard errors are reported in parentheses