Chunnan Liu1, Zhaopei Liu1, Kaifeng Jin2, Han Zeng3, Fei Shao4, Yuan Chang1, Yiwei Wang5, Le Xu6, Zewei Wang7, Yu Zhu8, Weijuan Zhang9. 1. Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China. 2. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. 3. Department of Urology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. 4. Department of Oncology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. 5. Department of Urology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. 6. Department of Urology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. 7. Department of Urology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. zwwang12@fudan.edu.cn. 8. Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China. yuzhu10@fudan.edu.cn. 9. Department of Immunology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. weijuanzhang@fudan.edu.cn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: CD39, a rate-limiting enzyme to convert extracellular ATP (eATP) to adenosine, has been reported to be a key modulator of immune response, but its correlation with therapeutic sensitivity remains obscure. We conducted this study to determine whether the integration of CD39 and traditional biomarkers could improve the prediction of responsiveness to PD-L1 blockade and platinum-based chemotherapy. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled a total of 760 patients from IMvigor210 trial, TCGA database and Zhongshan Hospital in this study. We constructed the CPT scoring system based on CD39, PD-L1 and tumour mutation burden (TMB) and validated its efficacy in predicting therapeutic responsiveness in MIBC patients. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression analyses were applied to assess clinical outcomes of patients. RESULTS: The CPT scoring system could predict the response to PD-L1 blockade and platinum-based chemotherapy. The CPT score was positively correlated with APOBEC mutational signature and SNV neoantigens enrichment, antigen presentation, and TCR signalling. High CPT score also indicated the inflamed immune phenotype and basal/squamous molecular subtype. CONCLUSIONS: CD39 expression is closely correlated with the immunogenic contexture of MIBC. Integrating CD39 with PD-L1 and TMB could stratify the sensitivity of patients with MIBC to PD-L1 blockade and platinum-based chemotherapy.
BACKGROUND: CD39, a rate-limiting enzyme to convert extracellular ATP (eATP) to adenosine, has been reported to be a key modulator of immune response, but its correlation with therapeutic sensitivity remains obscure. We conducted this study to determine whether the integration of CD39 and traditional biomarkers could improve the prediction of responsiveness to PD-L1 blockade and platinum-based chemotherapy. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled a total of 760 patients from IMvigor210 trial, TCGA database and Zhongshan Hospital in this study. We constructed the CPT scoring system based on CD39, PD-L1 and tumour mutation burden (TMB) and validated its efficacy in predicting therapeutic responsiveness in MIBC patients. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression analyses were applied to assess clinical outcomes of patients. RESULTS: The CPT scoring system could predict the response to PD-L1 blockade and platinum-based chemotherapy. The CPT score was positively correlated with APOBEC mutational signature and SNV neoantigens enrichment, antigen presentation, and TCR signalling. High CPT score also indicated the inflamed immune phenotype and basal/squamous molecular subtype. CONCLUSIONS: CD39 expression is closely correlated with the immunogenic contexture of MIBC. Integrating CD39 with PD-L1 and TMB could stratify the sensitivity of patients with MIBC to PD-L1 blockade and platinum-based chemotherapy.
Authors: Thomas Powles; Srikala S Sridhar; Yohann Loriot; Joaquim Bellmunt; Xinmeng Jasmine Mu; Keith A Ching; Jie Pu; Cora N Sternberg; Daniel P Petrylak; Rosa Tambaro; Louis M Dourthe; Carlos Alvarez-Fernandez; Maureen Aarts; Alessandra di Pietro; Petros Grivas; Craig B Davis Journal: Nat Med Date: 2021-12-10 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Francesco Di Virgilio; Alba Clara Sarti; Simonetta Falzoni; Elena De Marchi; Elena Adinolfi Journal: Nat Rev Cancer Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 60.716
Authors: J Alfred Witjes; Thierry Lebret; Eva M Compérat; Nigel C Cowan; Maria De Santis; Harman Maxim Bruins; Virginia Hernández; Estefania Linares Espinós; James Dunn; Mathieu Rouanne; Yann Neuzillet; Erik Veskimäe; Antoine G van der Heijden; Georgios Gakis; Maria J Ribal Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2016-06-30 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Dan Sha; Zhaohui Jin; Jan Budczies; Klaus Kluck; Albrecht Stenzinger; Frank A Sinicrope Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2020-11-02 Impact factor: 38.272
Authors: Sanjeev Mariathasan; Shannon J Turley; Dorothee Nickles; Alessandra Castiglioni; Kobe Yuen; Yulei Wang; Edward E Kadel; Hartmut Koeppen; Jillian L Astarita; Rafael Cubas; Suchit Jhunjhunwala; Romain Banchereau; Yagai Yang; Yinghui Guan; Cecile Chalouni; James Ziai; Yasin Şenbabaoğlu; Stephen Santoro; Daniel Sheinson; Jeffrey Hung; Jennifer M Giltnane; Andrew A Pierce; Kathryn Mesh; Steve Lianoglou; Johannes Riegler; Richard A D Carano; Pontus Eriksson; Mattias Höglund; Loan Somarriba; Daniel L Halligan; Michiel S van der Heijden; Yohann Loriot; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Lawrence Fong; Ira Mellman; Daniel S Chen; Marjorie Green; Christina Derleth; Gregg D Fine; Priti S Hegde; Richard Bourgon; Thomas Powles Journal: Nature Date: 2018-02-14 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: A J Schoenfeld; H Rizvi; C Bandlamudi; J L Sauter; W D Travis; N Rekhtman; A J Plodkowski; R Perez-Johnston; P Sawan; A Beras; J V Egger; M Ladanyi; K C Arbour; C M Rudin; G J Riely; B S Taylor; M T A Donoghue; M D Hellmann Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2020-02-06 Impact factor: 32.976