Literature DB >> 35997903

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Left and Extended Left Hepatectomy: An International Multicenter Study Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Iswanto Sucandy1, Shlomi Rayman1, Eric C Lai2, Chung-Ngai Tang2, Yvette Chong3, Mikhail Efanov4, David Fuks5, Gi-Hong Choi6, Charing C Chong7, Adrian K H Chiow8, Marco V Marino9,10, Mikel Prieto11, Jae-Hoon Lee12, T Peter Kingham13, Mathieu D'Hondt14, Roberto I Troisi15, Sung Hoon Choi16, Robert P Sutcliffe17, Tan-To Cheung18, Fernando Rotellar19,20, James O Park21, Olivier Scatton22, Ho-Seong Han23, Johann Pratschke24, Xiaoying Wang25, Rong Liu26, Brian K P Goh27,28.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Controversies exist among liver surgeons regarding clinical outcomes of the laparoscopic versus the robotic approach for major complex hepatectomies. The authors therefore designed a study to examine and compare the perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic left hepatectomy or extended left hepatectomy (L-LH/L-ELH) versus robotic left hepatectomy or extended left hepatectomy (R-LH/R-ELH) using a large international multicenter collaborative database.
METHODS: An international multicenter retrospective analysis of 580 patients undergoing L-LH/L-ELH or R-LH/R-ELH at 25 specialized hepatobiliary centers worldwide was undertaken. Propensity score-matching (PSM) was used at a 1:1 nearest-neighbor ratio according to 15 perioperative variables, including demographics, tumor characteristics, Child-Pugh score, presence of portal hypertension, multiple resections, histologic diagnosis, and Iwate difficulty grade.
RESULTS: Before the PSM, 190 (32 %) patients underwent R-LH/R-ELH, and 390 (68 %) patients underwent L-LH/L-ELH. After the matching, 164 patients were identified in each arm without significant differences in demographics, preoperative variables, medical history, tumor pathology, tumor characteristics, or Iwate score. Regarding intra- and postoperative outcomes, the rebotic approach had significantly less estimated blood loss (EBL) (100 ml [IQR 200 ml] vs 200 ml [IQR 235 ml]; p = 0.029), fewer conversions to open operations (n = 4 [2.4 %] vs n = 13, [7.9 %]; p = 0.043), and a shorter hospital stay (6 days [IQR 3 days] vs 7 days [IQR 3.3 days]; p = 0.009).
CONCLUSION: Both techniques are safe and feasible in major hepatic resections. Compared with L-LH/L-ELH, R-LH/R-ELH is associated with less EBL, fewer conversions to open operations, and a shorter hospital stay.
© 2022. Society of Surgical Oncology.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35997903     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12216-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   4.339


  3 in total

1.  A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection.

Authors:  Daisuke Ban; Minoru Tanabe; Hiromitsu Ito; Yuichiro Otsuka; Hiroyuki Nitta; Yuta Abe; Yasushi Hasegawa; Toshio Katagiri; Chisato Takagi; Osamu Itano; Hironori Kaneko; Go Wakabayashi
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 7.027

2.  Robotic and laparoscopic right anterior sectionectomy and central hepatectomy: multicentre propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Hye Yeon Yang; Gi Hong Choi; Ken-Min Chin; Sung Hoon Choi; Nicholas L Syn; Tan-To Cheung; Adrian K H Chiow; Iswanto Sucandy; Marco V Marino; Mikel Prieto; Charing C Chong; Jae Hoon Lee; Mikhail Efanov; T Peter Kingham; Robert P Sutcliffe; Roberto I Troisi; Johann Pratschke; Xiaoying Wang; Mathieu D'Hondt; Chung Ngai Tang; Rong Liu; James O Park; Fernando Rotellar; Olivier Scatton; Atsushi Sugioka; Tran Cong Duy Long; Chung-Yip Chan; David Fuks; Ho-Seong Han; Brian K P Goh
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 3.  Laparoscopic versus robotic major hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ioannis A Ziogas; Dimitrios Giannis; Stepan M Esagian; Konstantinos P Economopoulos; Samer Tohme; David A Geller
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 4.584

  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Application of Hazard Function to Investigate Recurrence of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma After Curative-Intent Liver Resection: A Novel Approach to Characterize Recurrence.

Authors:  Laura Alaimo; Zorays Moazzam; Zachary J Brown; Yutaka Endo; Andrea Ruzzenente; Alfredo Guglielmi; Luca Aldrighetti; Matthew Weiss; Todd W Bauer; Sorin Alexandrescu; George A Poultsides; Shishir K Maithel; Hugo P Marques; Guillaume Martel; Carlo Pulitano; Feng Shen; Olivier Soubrane; Bas Groot Koerkamp; Itaru Endo; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 4.339

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.