Literature DB >> 35997798

[Future implications of navigation in total knee arthroplasty].

Holger Bäthis1, Paola Kappel2, Thomas Rudolf Pfeiffer2, Matthias Fröhlich2, Michael Caspers2, Deha Murat Ates2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: After more than two decades of experience with computer-assisted knee arthroplasty, extensive experience and study data are available, allowing a profound evaluation. Undoubtedly, computer-assisted knee arthroplasty has been proven to achieve excellent results for implant positioning and long-leg axis reconstruction. Thus, computer-assisted knee arthroplasty represents the current gold standard to avoid unintended malpositioning of total knee components for neutrally aligned implants and individualized implant alignment (kinematic alignment, adjusted mechanical alignment, and others). Previous studies could not show significant differences in functional outcomes and patient satisfaction. However, recent meta-analyses showed relevant advantages of computer-assisted knee arthroplasty. These results could be based on further developments in software-assisted soft tissue balancing and more sensitive evaluation methods of follow-up examinations. LONG-TERM OUTCOME: Further, international registries show advantages of computer-assisted knee arthroplasty regarding long-term outcomes. In particular, the Australian arthroplasty registry describes a significantly lower revision rate due to aseptic loosening/osteolysis in the computer-assisted knee arthroplasty group, analyzing a period of up to 17 years. These positive effects can already be proven six months following surgery. FUTURE PROSPECTS: However, despite demonstrated benefits, computer-assisted knee arthroplasty has not yet become established in daily routine, and wide regional variations in its use are observed. Newer developments such as robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty, primarily based on navigation techniques, are currently being heavily promoted. However, this new technology must justify its enormous additional costs and prove its advantages compared to computer-assisted knee arthroplasty. In the backdrop of the development of computer-assisted knee arthroplasty, this might be a difficult task.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer-assisted surgery; Image-guided surgery; Implant alignment; Robotic; Total knee replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35997798     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-022-04285-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopadie (Heidelb)        ISSN: 2731-7145


  36 in total

1.  Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique.

Authors:  H Bäthis; L Perlick; M Tingart; C Lüring; D Zurakowski; J Grifka
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-07

2.  Alignments and clinical results in conventional and navigated total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  A Ensini; F Catani; A Leardini; M Romagnoli; S Giannini
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Does computer-assisted surgery improve postoperative leg alignment and implant positioning following total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials?

Authors:  Tao Cheng; Song Zhao; Xiaochun Peng; Xianlong Zhang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty is currently of no proven clinical benefit: a systematic review.

Authors:  R Stephen J Burnett; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Coronal alignment in total knee replacement: historical review, contemporary analysis, and future direction.

Authors:  M P Abdel; S Oussedik; S Parratte; S Lustig; F S Haddad
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.082

Review 6.  Computer Navigation-Assisted Knee Replacement Demonstrates Improved Outcome Compared with Conventional Knee Replacement at Mid-Term Follow-up: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Charles Ayekoloye; Osondu Nwangwu; Temitope Alonge
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 1.251

7.  The Chitranjan Ranawat award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus.

Authors:  Johan Bellemans; William Colyn; Hilde Vandenneucker; Jan Victor
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The use of computer-assisted orthopedic surgery for total knee replacement in daily practice: a survey among ESSKA/SGO-SSO members.

Authors:  N Friederich; R Verdonk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: just how important is it?

Authors:  David M Fang; Merrill A Ritter; Kenneth E Davis
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Survivorship and relative risk of revision in computer-navigated versus conventional total knee replacement at 8-year follow-up.

Authors:  Gro S Dyrhovden; Anne M Fenstad; Ove Furnes; Øystein Gøthesen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.