| Literature DB >> 35997450 |
Amr H Hashem1, Tharwat A Selim2, Mohammed H Alruhaili3, Samy Selim4, Dalal Hussien M Alkhalifah5, Soad K Al Jaouni6, Salem S Salem1.
Abstract
In the current study, prickly pear peel waste (PPPW) extract was used for the biosynthesis of selenium nanoparticles through a green and eco-friendly method for the first time. The biosynthesized SeNPs were characterized using UV-Vis, XRD, FTIR, TEM, SEM, EDX, and mapping. Characterization results revealed that biosynthesized SeNPs were spherical, polydisperse, highly crystalline, and had sizes in the range of 10-87.4 nm. Antibacterial, antifungal, and insecticidal activities of biosynthesized SeNPs were evaluated. Results revealed that SeNPs exhibited promising antibacterial against Gram negative (E. coli and P. aeruginosa) and Gram positive (B. subtilis and S. aureus) bacteria where MICs were 125, 125, 62.5, and 15.62 µg/mL, respectively. Moreover, SeNPs showed potential antifungal activity toward Candida albicans and Cryptococcus neoformans where MICs were 3.9 and 7.81 µg/mL, respectively. Furthermore, tested crud extract and SeNPs severely induced larvicidal activity for tested mosquitoes with LC50 and LC90 of 219.841, 950.087 mg/L and 75.411, 208.289 mg/L, respectively. The fecundity and hatchability of C. pipiens mosquito were significantly decreased as applied concentrations increased either for the crude or the fabricated SeNPs extracts. In conclusion, the biosynthesized SeNPs using prickly pear peel waste have antibacterial, antifungal, and insecticidal activities, which can be used in biomedical and environmental applications.Entities:
Keywords: antibacterial activity; antifungal activity; insecticidal activity; prickly pear peel; selenium nanoparticles
Year: 2022 PMID: 35997450 PMCID: PMC9397004 DOI: 10.3390/jfb13030112
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Funct Biomater ISSN: 2079-4983
Figure 1Green biosynthesis of SeNPs using PPPE.
Figure 2(A) UV–Vis spectrum and (B) FTIR analysis of SeNPs prepared from PPPW extract.
Figure 3XRD pattern of SeNPs prepared by PPPW extract.
Figure 4(A)TEM image, (B) SEM image, (C) elemental analysis, and (D–F) SEM/EDX mapping of SeNPs prepared by PPPW extract.
Figure 5Antimicrobial activity of biosynthesized SeNPs using the agar well diffusion method.
Antimicrobial activity of SeNPs at different concentrations.
| Test Material |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeNPs (µg/mL) | 2000 | 26.5 ± 0.70 a | 24.4 ± 0.85 a | 30.7 ± 0.53 a | 48.7 ± 1.06 a | 59.5 ± 0.70 a | 50.2 ± 1.13 a |
| 1000 | 21.7 ± 1.06 b | 21.6 ± 0.56 b | 27.5 ± 0.35 b | 41.5 ± 0.70 b | 54.7 ± 0.99 b | 46.4 ± 0.84 b | |
| 500 | 15.4 ± 0.56 c | 17.6 ± 0.85 c | 23.6 ± 0.46 c | 34.8 ± 1.20 c | 51.0 ± 1.34 c | 40.85 ± 1.20 c | |
| 250 | 11.7 ± 0.35 d | 11.3 ± 0.49 d | 19.2 ± 0.17 d | 29.6 ± 0.56 d | 45 ± 1.41 d | 36.8 ± 1.13 d | |
| 125 | 8.2 ± 0.35 e | 8.7 ± 0.42 e | 13.5 ± 0.32 e | 24.6 ± 0.84 e | 37.3 ± 0.91 e | 30.4 ± 0.64 e | |
| 62.5 | 0 ± 00 f | 0 ± 00 f | 8.7 ± 0.21 f | 20.7 ± 0.84 f | 34.25 ± 0.35 f | 26.4 ± 0.84 f | |
| 31.25 | 0 ± 00 f | 0 ± 00 f | 0 ± 00 g | 16.5 ± 0.70 g | 27.5 ± 0.70 g | 20.1 ± 1.20 g | |
| 15.62 | 0 ± 00 f | 0 ± 00 f | 0 ± 00 g | 10.6 ± 0.92 h | 24 ± 1.41 h | 14 ± 1.41 h | |
| 7.81 | 0 ± 00 f | 0 ± 00 f | 0 ± 00 g | 0 ± 00 i | 16.5 ± 0.70 i | 10.7 ± 0.35 i | |
| 3.9 | 0 ± 00 f | 0 ± 00 f | 0 ± 00 g | 0 ± 00 i | 12.3 ± 0.91 j | 0 ± 00 j | |
| 1.95 | 0 ± 00 f | 0 ± 00 f | 0 ± 00 g | 0 ± 00 i | 0 ± 00 k | 0 ± 00 j | |
| PPPW * | 0±00 | 0 ± 00 | 0 ± 00 | 0 ± 00 | 0 ± 00 | 0 ± 00 | |
| SAM/AMB ** | 0±00 | 14.5 ± 0.5 | 15.6 ± 0.4 | 10.1 ± 0.9 | 0 ± 00 | 0 ± 00 | |
* PPPE means prickly pear peel and ** SAM/AMB means (Ampicillin/sulbactam)/Amphotericin B. Superscript letters from a to k revealed the power of significance.
Larvicidal activity of the PPPW crude and synthesized Opuntia ficus-indica Selenium nanoparticles (SeNPs) extracts for the mosquito vector, C. pipiens.
| Treatments | Concentrations (mg/L) |
| Larval Mortality | LC50 | LC90 | Statistic Summary |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude extract of PPPW | Control | 75 | 0.0 ± 0.0 a | 219.841 | 950.087 | |
| 50 | 75 | 10.67 ± 1.33 b | ||||
| 100 | 75 | 26.67 ± 1.33 c | ||||
| 200 | 75 | 41.33 ± 1.33 d | ||||
| 400 | 75 | 69.33 ± 1.33 e | ||||
| 800 | 75 | 89.33 ±1.33 f | ||||
| SeNPs | Control | 75 | 0.0 ± 0.0 a | 75.411 | 208.289 | |
| 25 | 75 | 13.3 ± 1.33 b | ||||
| 50 | 75 | 28.0 ± 4.0 c | ||||
| 100 | 75 | 52.0 ± 4.61d | ||||
| 200 | 75 | 93.3 ± 2.58 e | ||||
| 400 | 75 | 100.0 ± 0.0 e | ||||
| Se ions | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil |
Larval mortalities are presented as Mean ± SE of three replicates. Means with different letters are significantly different at (p < 0.05). (LC50) concentration that kills 50% of population, (LC90) concentration that kills 90% of population, (LCL) lower confidence limit, (UCL) upper confidence limit, (d. f.) degree of freedom, (χ2) Chi-square, n = sample size.
Fecundity and egg-hatchability of the mosquito, C. pipiens treated with different concentrations of the PPPW crude extract, and SeNPs of Opuntia ficus-indica.
| Treatment | Concentration | Fecundity | Hatchability | Hatchability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude extract of PPPW | Control | 142.0 ± 6.11 a | 138.3 ± 5.24 a | 97.46 |
| 50 | 133.3 ± 4.41 a | 124.0 ± 4.16 b | 93.02 | |
| 100 | 110.0 ± 1.54 b | 93.3 ± 2.40 c | 84.9 | |
| 200 | 93.3 ± 1.67 c | 76.0 ± 1.0 d | 81.52 | |
| 400 | 59.3 ± 2.96 d | 44.67 ± 2.60 e | 75.23 | |
| 800 | 48.3 ± 1.67 e | 29.3 ± 2.40 f | 60.74 | |
| Statistic Summary | ||||
| SeNPs | Control | 143.67 ± 1.85 a | 131.67 ± 6.01 a | 91.577 |
| 25 | 126.67 ± 1.67 b | 106.67 ± 1.67 b | 84.205 | |
| 50 | 98.0 ± 2.0 c | 72.33 ± 1.45 c | 73.929 | |
| 100 | 63.3 ± 1.67 d | 26.67 ± 1.76 d | 42.137 | |
| 200 | 30.67 ± 2.96 e | 10.0 ± 0.58 e | 32.893 | |
| 400 | 13.67 ± 1.85 f | 2.67 ± 0.88 f | 18.472 | |
| Statistic summary | ||||
Larval mortalities are presented as Mean ± SE of three replicates. Means with different letters are significantly different at (p < 0.05). (LC50) concentration that kills 50% of population, (LC90) concentration that kills 90% of population, (LCL) lower confidence limit, (UCL) upper confidence limit, (d. f.) degree of freedom, (χ2) Chi-square, n = sample size.