| Literature DB >> 35392922 |
Mohamed F Salem1, Wessam A Abd-Elraoof2, Ahmed A Tayel3, Fahad M Alzuaibr4, Osama M Abonama5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Citrus production and trading are seriously affected by fungal decays worldwide; the green mold infection by Penicillium digitatum could be the most disastrous. The substitutions of chemical and synthetic fungicides with effectual natural alternatives are global demands; plant extract from pomegranates peels (PPE), biosynthesized selenium nanoparticles with PPE (PPE/SeNPs) and chitosan nanoparticles (NCT) were suggested as efficacious fungicidal agents/nanocomposites to control P. digitatum strains.Entities:
Keywords: Characterization; Green synthesis; Mode of action; Nanocomposites; Nanopolymers coating; Orange; Penicillium digitatum infection
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35392922 PMCID: PMC8991507 DOI: 10.1186/s12951-022-01393-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nanobiotechnology ISSN: 1477-3155 Impact factor: 10.435
Fig. 1Infra-red spectra of employed materials, including nanochitosan (NCT), pomegranate peels (PPE) extract, PPE synthesized SeNPs (PPE/SeNPs) and their composites
Ps distribution and ζ potential of fabricated nanochitosan (NCT), biosynthesized selenium nanoparticles with PPE (PPE/SeNPs), and their composites (NCT/PPE/SeNPs)
| Nanoparticles | Size range (nm) | Mean diameter (nm) | Zeta potential (mV) |
|---|---|---|---|
| NCT | 22.18–159.73 | 82.72 | + 38.8 |
| PPE/SeNPs | 3.41–21.35 | 9.41 | − 31.4 |
| NCT/ PPE/SeNPs | 24.58–164.71 | 85.17 | + 31.7 |
Fig. 2Nanoparticles’ ultrastructure using SEM for nanochitosan (A), and TEM for pomegranate peels-synthesized SeNPs (B)
In vitro antifungal assessment of experimented agents against Penicillium digitatum isolates, via measurement of inhibition zones diameter (ZOI, mm) and minimal fungicidal concentrations (MFC, mg/mL)
| Antifungal compound1 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZOI2 | MFC3 | ZOI | MFC | ZOI | MFC | |
| NCT | 18.3 ± 1.5a | 35.0 | 19.1 ± 1.8a | 32.5 | 20.4 ± 1.3a | 32.5 |
| PPE | 21.6 ± 1.7b | 32.0 | 21.8 ± 2.1b | 30.0 | 22.2 ± 2.3b | 27.5 |
| PPE/SeNPs | 25.3 ± 2.2c | 25.0 | 25.8 ± 1.9c | 22.5 | 25.5 ± 1.9c | 25.0 |
| NCT/PPE/SeNPs | 30.1 ± 2.0d | 17.5 | 31.4 ± 2.4d | 15.0 | 30.8 ± 2.8d | 12.5 |
| Imazilil | 23.7 ± 1.9c | 27.5 | 24.1 ± 2.3c | 25.0 | 25.3 ± 2.6c | 22.5 |
1The experimented agents included nanochitosan (NCT), extract of pomegranate peels (PPE), biosynthesized selenium nanoparticles with PPE (PPE/SeNPs), and their composites, compared to standard fungicide imazilil
2Dissimilar superscript letters (a-d) in a column appointed significant difference at P > 0.05
3The MFC ranges for isolates susceptibility were set as: ≤ 25 mg/mL (highly susceptible), 25–50 mg/mL (moderately susceptible), 50–75 mg/mL (partially resistant) and > 75 mg/mL (resistant)
Fig. 3Optical microscope observations of treated Penicillium digitatum mycelia with composited nanochitosan/pomegranate peels extract/SeNPs for 6 h (B) and 12 h (C), compared to untreated mycelia (A)
Fig. 4Consequences of orange fruits coating with formulated nanochitosan (NCT), NCT with extract of pomegranate peels (NCT/PPE) and NCT/PPE/SeNPs, after 10 days of infection with Penicillium digitatum