| Literature DB >> 35996812 |
Michaela E Copp1,2,3, Susan Chubinskaya4, Daniel N Bracey5, Jacqueline Shine2, Garrett Sessions2,6, Richard F Loeser2,6,7, Brian O Diekman1,2,3.
Abstract
It is known that chondrocytes from joints with osteoarthritis (OA) exhibit high levels of DNA damage, but the degree to which chondrocytes accumulate DNA damage during "normal aging" has not been established. The goal of this study was to quantify the DNA damage present in chondrocytes obtained from cadaveric donors of a wide age range, and to compare the extent of this damage to OA chondrocytes. The alkaline comet assay was used to measure the DNA damage in normal cartilage from the ankle (talus) and the knee (femur) of cadaveric donors, as well as in OA chondrocytes obtained at the time of total knee replacement. Chondrocytes from younger donors (<45 years) had less DNA damage than older donors (>70 years) as assessed by the percentage of DNA in the comet "tail". In donors between 50 and 60 years old, there was increased DNA damage in chondrocytes from OA cartilage as compared to cadaveric. Talar chondrocytes from 23 donors between the ages of 34 and 78 revealed a linear increase in DNA damage with age (R2 = 0.865, p < 0.0001). A "two-tailed" comet assay was used to demonstrate that most of the accumulated damage is in the form of strand breaks as opposed to alkali-labile base damage. Chondrocytes from young donors required 10 Gy irradiation to recapitulate the DNA damage present in chondrocytes from older donors. Given the potential for DNA damage to contribute to chondrocyte dysfunction and senescence, this study supports the investigation of mechanisms by which hypo-replicative cell types accumulate high levels of damage.Entities:
Keywords: arthritis; cartilage; single-cell gel electrophoresis
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35996812 PMCID: PMC9470893 DOI: 10.1111/acel.13698
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aging Cell ISSN: 1474-9718 Impact factor: 11.005
FIGURE 1DNA damage in chondrocytes with aging and osteoarthritis. (a) Percent DNA in comet tail for chondrocytes from cadaveric donors of various ages with Collins grade shown. Dots are individual cells, with the mean shown as blue bars. Example cells with given % DNA in tail shown, with wide‐field images in Figure S1. (b) Donor mean % DNA in comet tail for those younger than 45 years of age (mean: 7.7%) and older than 70 years of age (mean: 29.9%). Stats by t‐test. (c) Two‐tailed comet using distance between centroid of comet head (green outline) and centroid of entire region including the tail (red outline). Strand breaks show up in x direction under neutral conditions, and base damage is detected under alkaline conditions during the second electrophoresis (y direction). Chondrocytes from 49 yo serve as low damage control and were treated to induce damage. Ellipticine: 1 h with 1 μM; MMS acute: 30 min with 0.5 mM; MMS repair: Treatment removed before overnight repair; IR: 10 Gy irradiation applied to cells in gel on comet slide 15 min before lysis. Mean ± SEM both directions. ~100 cells per group. (d) Cadaveric tissue from donors with no clinical history of OA as compared to cartilage from end‐stage OA at total knee replacement. All donors between 50 and 60 years of age. Mean tail DNA percent in the normal ankle is 17.5%, in normal femur is 13.9%, and in OA tissue is 28.5%. Stats by ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc. Single‐cell analysis for panel D shown in Figure S2.
FIGURE 2Linearity of DNA damage increase with age and comparison to damage from irradiation. (a) Linear regression for the 23 normal ankles, with p value and R2 shown. OA donors (red) are plotted next to the normal donors and fall above the regression line. Cadaveric femur (blue) was available from four donors. Data are from Figure 1b, d, with the addition of 4 donors: 45 yo (grade 1,2), 65 yo (grade 0,1), 68 yo (grade 1,2), and 78 yo (grade 1). (b) DNA damage with increasing irradiation dose from 0 to 10 Gy. The average percent DNA in comet tail from the chondrocytes treated with 10 Gy of irradiation was 26.4%.