Literature DB >> 35993720

Draft Genome Sequence of the Multiple Antibiotic Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1-UB Subline.

Kah-Ooi Chua1, Paul Norton2, Pavlos Trus3, Maria Katsikogianni4, M Julie Thornton2, Kok-Gan Chan5,6, Chien-Yi Chang3.   

Abstract

We report the draft genome sequence and antibiotic susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PAO1-UB, a subline of the common reference strain PAO1. This strain was sequenced in order to provide information on the genome dynamics of PAO1 sublines and their genes conferring resistance to multiple antibiotics.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35993720      PMCID: PMC9476901          DOI: 10.1128/mra.00646-22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiol Resour Announc        ISSN: 2576-098X


ANNOUNCEMENT

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a Gram-negative bacterium and an opportunistic pathogen of humans, plants, and animals which has the ability to develop resistance to multiple classes of antibiotics (1, 2). Although a high number of P. aeruginosa strains and isolates have been reported to date, PAO1 remains the most-used reference strain for Pseudomonas research (3, 4) and has been distributed and maintained in laboratories and culture collections worldwide, giving rise to different sublines. Studies have shown that different PAO1 strains individually maintained and adapted by various research groups can undergo microevolution, even if the strain originated from the same ancestral PAO strain isolated in 1955, which has been suggested to be lost (1). In many cases, strain-to-strain genomic and phenotypic variabilities have been reported (1, 5). Hereby, we performed whole-genome sequencing and antibiotic susceptibility testing of P. aeruginosa PAO1-UB, which is maintained in our laboratory collection. The Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion assay, conducted on Oxoid nutrient broth (NB) agar at 37°C for 24 h, revealed that PAO1-UB was resistant to penicillin G, oxacillin, chloramphenicol, erythromycin, fusidic acid, novobiocin, clindamycin, and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim. However, PAO1-UB exhibited susceptibility to gentamycin and tetracycline (Table 1).
TABLE 1

Antibiotic susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1-UB using the disk diffusion method

AntibioticConcn on diskaZone of inhibition (mm)Bacterial susceptibility
Penicillin G1 unit0Resistant
Oxacillin5 μg0Resistant
Chloramphenicol25 μg0Resistant
Erythromycin5 μg0Resistant
Gentamycin10 μg18Susceptible
Tetracycline30 μg20Susceptible
Fusidic acid10 μg0Resistant
Novobiocin5 μg0Resistant
Clindamycin2 μg0Resistant
Sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim25 μg0Resistant

The filter paper disks are about 6 mm in diameter.

Antibiotic susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1-UB using the disk diffusion method The filter paper disks are about 6 mm in diameter. Whole-genome sequencing of the strain was performed by MicrobesNG. Briefly, the genomic DNA was extracted from a 37°C overnight NB culture using solid-phase reversible immobilization (SPRI) beads (Beckman Coulter, USA). The library was prepared using the Nextera XT library prep kit (Illumina, USA) on a Hamilton Microlab STAR automated liquid handling system. The library was sequenced using an Illumina NovaSeq platform (250-bp paired-end setting). The raw data were quality filtered using Trimmomatic, and de novo genome assembly was performed using SPAdes v3.15.4 (6). The assembled draft genome was assessed for quality using QUAST v5.2.2 and completeness using Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Ortholog (BUSCO) v5.3.2 (7). Genome annotation was carried out using the Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) (8), Prokka v1.14.6 (9), and a resistome analysis in the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD) (https://card.mcmaster.ca/) (10). Default parameters were used for all software. The sequencing resulted in 1,312,546 quality-filtered reads (range, 36 to 251 bp). The assembled draft genome of P. aeruginosa PAO1-UB was 5,912,399 bp long and consisted of 155 contigs with 66.8% G+C content (coverage, 30×). PGAP annotation revealed 5,501 coding DNA sequences (CDS), 6 rRNAs, and 57 tRNAs. The draft genome sequence was shorter and had fewer genes than the complete genome of P. aeruginosa POA1 (GenBank accession number AE004091; 6,264,404 bp; 5,572 CDS, 13 rRNAs, and 63 tRNAs). Nonetheless, the PAO1-UB draft genome scored 99.3% completeness in the BUSCO analysis using the Pseudomonadales data set. Genes conferring resistance to antibiotics, such as β-lactams (blaOXA-396 [locus tag, NF546_RS12590] and a Pseudomonas-derived cephalosporinase, PDC-5 [NF546_RS26465]) and fosfomycin (fosA) (NF546_RS20960), were detected in the genome. The resistome analysis also identified component genes of multiple drug efflux systems that were responsible for resistance to chloramphenicol (mexA [NF546_RS08650], mexB [NF546_RS08655], and oprM [NF546_RS08660]) and fluoroquinolones (mexC-mexD-oprJ [NF546_RS17525, NF546_RS17520, NF546_RS17515]). Overall, these data on antibiotic susceptibility and from the resistome analysis of PAO1-UB will be useful for interlaboratory comparison to assess the genomic and phenotypic variability between different P. aeruginosa PAO1 sublines. No ethical approval was required for this research.

Data availability.

This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession number JAMWGW000000000. The version described in this paper is version JAMWGW010000000. The project data are available under the BioSample accession number SAMN29127182 and the BioProject accession number PRJNA849708. The raw sequencing reads were deposited in SRA under the accession number SRR20177986.
  10 in total

1.  Genetic recombination in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  B W HOLLOWAY
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1955-12

2.  Genomic and Phenotypic Diversity among Ten Laboratory Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1.

Authors:  Courtney E Chandler; Alexander M Horspool; Preston J Hill; Daniel J Wozniak; Jeffrey W Schertzer; David A Rasko; Robert K Ernst
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs.

Authors:  Felipe A Simão; Robert M Waterhouse; Panagiotis Ioannidis; Evgenia V Kriventseva; Evgeny M Zdobnov
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation.

Authors:  Torsten Seemann
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 5.  Genome organization in Pseudomonas.

Authors:  B W Holloway; A F Morgan
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 15.500

6.  Using SPAdes De Novo Assembler.

Authors:  Andrey Prjibelski; Dmitry Antipov; Dmitry Meleshko; Alla Lapidus; Anton Korobeynikov
Journal:  Curr Protoc Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-06

7.  Genome diversity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 laboratory strains.

Authors:  Jens Klockgether; Antje Munder; Jens Neugebauer; Colin F Davenport; Frauke Stanke; Karen D Larbig; Stephan Heeb; Ulrike Schöck; Thomas M Pohl; Lutz Wiehlmann; Burkhard Tümmler
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 8.  Current Knowledge and Future Directions in Developing Strategies to Combat Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection.

Authors:  Stephen K Dolan
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2020-08-02       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline.

Authors:  Tatiana Tatusova; Michael DiCuccio; Azat Badretdin; Vyacheslav Chetvernin; Eric P Nawrocki; Leonid Zaslavsky; Alexandre Lomsadze; Kim D Pruitt; Mark Borodovsky; James Ostell
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  CARD 2020: antibiotic resistome surveillance with the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database.

Authors:  Brian P Alcock; Amogelang R Raphenya; Tammy T Y Lau; Kara K Tsang; Mégane Bouchard; Arman Edalatmand; William Huynh; Anna-Lisa V Nguyen; Annie A Cheng; Sihan Liu; Sally Y Min; Anatoly Miroshnichenko; Hiu-Ki Tran; Rafik E Werfalli; Jalees A Nasir; Martins Oloni; David J Speicher; Alexandra Florescu; Bhavya Singh; Mateusz Faltyn; Anastasia Hernandez-Koutoucheva; Arjun N Sharma; Emily Bordeleau; Andrew C Pawlowski; Haley L Zubyk; Damion Dooley; Emma Griffiths; Finlay Maguire; Geoff L Winsor; Robert G Beiko; Fiona S L Brinkman; William W L Hsiao; Gary V Domselaar; Andrew G McArthur
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.