| Literature DB >> 35991946 |
Qi An1, Yang-Yuan Qiu2, Yan Lou3, Yan Jiang1, Hong-Yu Qiu1, Zhong-Huai Zhang1, Ben Li1, Ai-Hui Zhang1, Wei Wei1, Ying-Yu Chen1, Jun-Feng Gao1, Chun-Ren Wang1.
Abstract
Diplodiscus japonicus and Diplodiscus mehari (Trematoda: Diplodiscidae) are two important parasites in wood frogs, which have large infection rates and essential importance of ecology, economy and society. In this study, the complete mitochondrial (mt) genomes of D. japonicus and D. mehari were sequenced, then compared with other related trematodes in the superfamily Paramphistomoidea. The complete circular mt sequence of D. japonicus and D. mehari were 14,210 bp and 14,179 bp in length, respectively. Both mt genomes comprised 36 functional subunits, consisting of 12 protein-coding genes (PCGs), two ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes, 22 transfer RNA (tRNA) genes, and one non-coding region. The mt genes of D. japonicus and D. mehari were transcribed in the same direction, and the gene arrangements were identical to those of Paramphistomoidea trematodes. In the 12 PCGs, GTG was the most common initiation codon, whereas TAG was the most common termination codon. All tRNAs had a typical cloverleaf structure except tRNA Ser1. A comparison with related Paramphistomoidea trematode mt genomes suggested that the cox1 gene of D. mehari was the longest in these trematodes. Phylogenetic analyses revealed that Paramphistomoidea trematodes formed a monophyletic branch, Paramphistomidae and Gastrothylacidae were more closely related than Diplodiscidae. And the further analysis with Pronocephalata branch found that the flukes parasitic in amphibians (frogs) formed one group, and the flukes from ruminants (cattle, sheep, ect) formed another group. Our study demonstrated the importance of sequencing mt genomes of D. japonicus and D. mehari, which will provide significant molecular resources for further studies of Paramphistomoidea taxonomy, population genetics and systematics.Entities:
Keywords: Diplodiscus japonicus; Diplodiscus mehari; Mitochondrial genome; Paramphistomidae; Phylogenetic analyses; Sequence analysis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35991946 PMCID: PMC9385452 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2022.07.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl ISSN: 2213-2244 Impact factor: 2.773
Fig. 1Diplodiscus japonicus and Diplodiscus mehari mitochondrial genomes arrangement. All 22 tRNA genes are designated by the one-letter code with numbers differentiating each of the two tRNAs leucine and serine. All genes are coded by the same DNA strand and are transcribed clockwise. NCR refers to the non-coding region.
Mitochondrial genome organization of Diplodiscus japonicus and Diplodiscus mehari.
| Genes | Position | Length (bp) | Initiation codon | Stop codon | Anticodon | Intergenic nucleotide |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D. j/D.m | D.j/D.m | D.j/D.m | D.j/D.m | D.j/D.m | D.j/D.m | |
| 1–645/1–645 | 645/645 | ATG/ATG | TAA/TAG | 11/13 | ||
| 657–718/659–714 | 62/56 | GTG/GTG | 6/9 | |||
| 725–1837/724–1839 | 1113/1116 | ATG/ATG | TAA/TAG | 11/9 | ||
| 1849–2112/1849–2112 | 264/264 | ATG/GTG | TAG/TAG | −40/–40 | ||
| 2073–3359/2073–3359 | 1287/1287 | ATG/GTG | TAA/TAA | 8/8 | ||
| 3367–3429/3368–3431 | 63/64 | TTG/TTG | 1/2 | |||
| 3431–3495/3434–3501 | 65/68 | GAA/GAA | 24/17 | |||
| 3520–3585/3519–3582 | 66/64 | CAT/CAT | 3/3 | |||
| 3589–4104/3586–4101 | 516/516 | ATG/ATG | TAG/TAA | 9/18 | ||
| 4114–4983/4120–4989 | 870/870 | GTGATG/ | TAG/TAG | 14/34 | ||
| 4998–5066/5024–5093 | 69/70 | TAC/TAC | 33/17 | |||
| 5100–5162/5111–5174 | 63/64 | TGC/TGC | 10/6 | |||
| 5173–5238/5181–5245 | 66/65 | GTC/GTC | 1/1 | |||
| 5240–6142/5247–6149 | 903/903 | GTG/GTG | TAG/TAG | 11/10 | ||
| 6154–6222/6160–6229 | 69/70 | GTT/GTT | 25/29 | |||
| 6248–6312/6259–6323 | 65/65 | TGG/TGG | 0/0 | |||
| 6313–6373/6324–6384 | 61/61 | GAT/GAT | 20/25 | |||
| 6394–6451/6410–6479 | 58/70 | CTT/CTT | 11/0 | |||
| 6463–6816/6480–6833 | 354/354 | GTG/GTG | TAA/TAA | 13/1 | ||
| 6830–6889/6835–6894 | 60/60 | AGC/AGC | 18/20 | |||
| 6908–6978/6915–6983 | 71/69 | TCA/TCA | 3/–21 | |||
| 6982–8529/6963–8534 | 1548/1571 | GTG/GTG | TAG/TAA | 16/1 | ||
| 8546–8619/8546–8618 | 74/73 | TGT/TGT | 2/2 | |||
| 8622–9629/8621–9625 | 1008/1005 | −12/–11 | ||||
| 9618–9683/9615–9680 | 66/66 | GCA/GCA | 3/3 | |||
| 9685–10451/9682–10448 | 767/767 | −13/–11 | ||||
| 10439–11023/10438–11022 | 585/585 | ATG/ATG | TAA/TAG | 6/12 | ||
| 11030–11485/11035–11490 | 456/456 | GTG/GTG | TAG/TAG | 14/15 | ||
| 11500–11564/11506–11569 | 65/64 | GTA/GTA | 25/14 | |||
| 11590–11660/11584–11653 | 71/70 | CTA/TAG | 3/1 | |||
| 11664–11730/11655–11717 | 67/63 | TGA/TGA | 61/28 | |||
| 11792–11858/11746–11811 | 67/66 | TAA/TAA | 13/14 | |||
| 11872–11938/11826–11889 | 67/64 | TCG/TCG | 2/3 | |||
| 11941–13503/11893–13455 | 1563/1563 | ATG/ATG | TAG/TAA | 15/21 | ||
| 13519–13586/1347713545 | 68/69 | TCC/TCC | 19/16 | |||
| 13606–13673/13562–13629 | 68/68 | TTC/TTC | 0/0 | |||
| NCR | 13674–14210/13630–14179 | 537/550 | 0/0 |
Note: D. j, Diplodiscus japonicus, D. h, Diplodiscus mehari.
Fig. 2A + T content and nucleotide skew of genes, individual elements, and the complete mitogenome of 11 Paramphistomoidea trematodes.
Comparison of 12PCGs among Diplodiscus japonicus, Diplodiscus mehari and other superfamily Paramphistomoidea trematodes.
| Genes | Nucleotides similarity (%) | Amino acid similarity (%) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. nucleotides/No. amino acid | |||||||||||||
| 645/133 | 645/138 | 645/132 | 645/124 | 645/126 | 645/127 | 645/128 | 645/123 | 645/131 | 645/129 | 645/129 | 62.3–89.3 | 83.3–98.8 | |
| 1113/236 | 1116/328 | 1116/236 | 1113/237 | 1113/237 | 1113/234 | 1116/239 | 1113/244 | 1113/240 | 1113/240 | 1113/241 | 72.0–91.3 | 71.5–82.8 | |
| 264/50 | 264/50 | 264/49 | 264/45 | 264/45 | 264/43 | 264/45 | 264/42 | 264/44 | 264/44 | 264/43 | 68.2–92.3 | 80.5–100.0 | |
| 1287/270 | 1287/267 | 1287/267 | 1281/259 | 1281/263 | 1281/258 | 1281/262 | 1281/258 | 1281/264 | 1281/262 | 1281/260 | 66.7–90.4 | 81.5–97.6 | |
| 516/91 | 516/94 | 516/94 | 516/97 | 516/95 | 516/94 | 516/96 | 516/98 | 516/94 | 516/98 | 516/96 | 69.6–92.2 | 86.0–97.7 | |
| 870/180 | 870/177 | 870/175 | 876/172 | 873/171 | 858/169 | 873/174 | 858/167 | 873/174 | 873/183 | 876/169 | 64.8–89.7 | 70.1–84.9 | |
| 903/190 | 903/189 | 903/193 | 897/178 | 897/178 | 903/184 | 897/180 | 897/181 | 897/184 | 897/178 | 897/182 | 72.6–90.5 | 70.0–91.3 | |
| 354/72 | 354/75 | 354/74 | 357/71 | 357/72 | 378/80 | 357/69 | 356/71 | 357/72 | 357/70 | 357/70 | 60.8–90.7 | 81.5–97.6 | |
| 1548/334 | 1572/339 | 1548/337 | 1542/330 | 1542/334 | 1542/335 | 1542/334 | 1542/331 | 1545/336 | 1545/349 | 1542/334 | 72.9–92.5 | 70.5–92.2 | |
| 585/130 | 585/128 | 585/128 | 582/123 | 582/124 | 582/122 | 585/125 | 582/127 | 579/123 | 582/131 | 582/126 | 68.5–94.5 | 84.7–97.4 | |
| 456/99 | 456/98 | 456/98 | 501/109 | 453/94 | 453/96 | 453/94 | 453/94 | 453/98 | 453/96 | 453/95 | 67.3–90.2 | 57.3–98.2 | |
| 1563/325 | 1563/325 | 1563/322 | 1581/332 | 1581/334 | 1581/325 | 1581/328 | 1581/332 | 1581/331 | 1584/331 | 1581/331 | 67.5–89.3 | 49.3–67.4 | |
| Total nt/aa | 10104/2110 | 10131/2117 | 10107/2105 | 10155/2077 | 10089/2073 | 10116/2067 | 10110/2074 | 10088/2068 | 10104/2091 | 10110/2111 | 10109/2076 | 69.6.–90.2 | 63.3–96.3 |
| Total size (bp) | 14179 | 14210 | 14697 | 14120 | 14256 | 14801 | 14028 | 13800 | 14023 | 14050 | 13968 | 62.1–89.9 | |
Note: D. j, Diplodiscus japonicus, D. m, Diplodiscus mehari, D. n, Diplodiscus nigromaculati, F. e, Fischoederius elongatus, F. c, Fischoederius cobboldi, G. c, Gastrothylax crumenifer, C.m, Calicophoron microbothrioides, O.s, Orthocoelium streptocoelium, P. c, Paramphistomum cervi, P. l, Paramphistomum leydeni, E. e, Explanatum explanatum.
Fig. 3Relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) of 12 protein coding genes of Diplodiscus japonicus and Diplodiscus mehari. The termination codon is not given.
Fig. 4Sliding window analysis of the complete mt genome sequences of 11 Paramphistomoidea trematodes. A sliding window of 300 bp (in 10 bp overlapping steps) was used to estimate nucleotide diversity Pi (π) across the alignments. Nucleotide diversity was plotted against the mid-point positions of each window. Each gene boundary is identified.
Fig. 5Proportions between rates of non-synonymous (dN) and synonymous (dS) nucleotide substitutions (dN/dS). Bar chart for pairwise proportions of dN/dS for each of the mitochondrial subunits of the Diplodiscus spp.
Fig. 6Phylogenetic relationships of Diplodiscus japonicus and Diplodiscus mehari with other 30 representative Digenea trematodes based on concatenated amino acid sequences of 12 protein coding genes analyzed by maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) using Gyrodactylus salaris as the outgroup. Statistical support values (Bootstrap/posterior probability) of ML/BI analysis are shown above the nodes. Circles indicate ML/BI = 100/1.0, other values are given above the nodes. Suborders and families are highlighted by individual colors. Accession numbers are given for each species at the end of each sequence. The scale bar corresponds to the estimated number of substitutions per site. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)