Literature DB >> 35991318

Physical habitat in conterminous US streams and Rivers, part 2: A quantitative assessment of habitat condition.

Philip R Kaufmann1,2, Robert M Hughes2,3, Steven G Paulsen1, David V Peck1, Curt W Seeliger4, Tom Kincaid1, Richard M Mitchell5.   

Abstract

Rigorous assessments of the ecological condition of water resources and the effect of human activities on those waters require quantitative physical, chemical, and biological data. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's river and stream surveys quantify river and stream bed particle size and stability, instream habitat complexity and cover, riparian vegetation cover and structure, and anthropogenic disturbance activities. Physical habitat is strongly controlled by natural geoclimatic factors that co-vary with human activities. We expressed the anthropogenic alteration of physical habitat as O/E ratios of observed habitat metric values divided by values expected under least-disturbed reference conditions, where site-specific expected values vary given their geoclimatic and geomorphic context. We set criteria for good, fair, and poor condition based on the distribution of O/E values in regional least-disturbed reference sites. Poor conditions existed in 22-24% of the 1.2 million km of streams and rivers in the conterminous U.S. for riparian human disturbance, streambed sediment and riparian vegetation cover, versus 14% for instream habitat complexity. Based on the same four indicators, the percentage of stream length in poor condition within 9 separate U.S. ecoregions ranged from 4% to 42%. Associations of our physical habitat indices with anthropogenic pressures demonstrate the scope of anthropogenic habitat alteration; habitat condition was negatively related to the level of anthropogenic disturbance nationally and in nearly all ecoregions. Relative risk estimates showed that streams and rivers with poor sediment, riparian cover complexity, or instream habitat cover conditions were 1.4 to 2.6 times as likely to also have fish or macroinvertebrate assemblages in poor condition. Our physical habitat condition indicators help explain deviations in biological conditions from those observed among least-disturbed sites and inform management actions for rehabilitating impaired waters and mitigating further ecological degradation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ecological assessment; Hydro-morphology; Instream fine sediments; Relative risk; Riparian disturbance; Riparian vegetation; Stream habitat complexity; Streambed stability

Year:  2022        PMID: 35991318      PMCID: PMC9389467          DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Indic        ISSN: 1470-160X            Impact factor:   6.263


  21 in total

1.  Fish and aquatic habitat conservation in South America: a continental overview with emphasis on neotropical systems.

Authors:  M Barletta; A J Jaureguizar; C Baigun; N F Fontoura; A A Agostinho; V M F Almeida-Val; A L Val; R A Torres; L F Jimenes-Segura; T Giarrizzo; N N Fabré; V S Batista; C Lasso; D C Taphorn; M F Costa; P T Chaves; J P Vieira; M F M Corrêa
Journal:  J Fish Biol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.051

2.  Understanding the controls on deposited fine sediment in the streams of agricultural catchments.

Authors:  P S Naden; J F Murphy; G H Old; J Newman; P Scarlett; M Harman; C P Duerdoth; A Hawczak; J L Pretty; A Arnold; C Laizé; D D Hornby; A L Collins; D A Sear; J I Jones
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Setting expectations for the ecological condition of streams: the concept of reference condition.

Authors:  John L Stoddard; David P Larsen; Charles P Hawkins; Richard K Johnson; Richard H Norris
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.657

4.  Habitat loss drives threshold response of benthic invertebrate communities to deposited sediment in agricultural streams.

Authors:  Francis J Burdon; Angus R McIntosh; Jon S Harding
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.657

5.  Linking the Agricultural Landscape of the Midwest to Stream Health with Structural Equation Modeling.

Authors:  Travis S Schmidt; Peter C Van Metre; Daren M Carlisle
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  The Relation of Lotic Fish and Benthic Macroinvertebrate Condition Indices to Environmental Factors Across the Conterminous USA.

Authors:  Alan T Herlihy; Jean C Sifneos; Robert M Hughes; David V Peck; Richard M Mitchell
Journal:  Ecol Indic       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 4.958

7.  Additive effects prevail: The response of biota to multiple stressors in an intensively monitored watershed.

Authors:  Alexander Gieswein; Daniel Hering; Christian K Feld
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  Assessment of dam effects on streams and fish assemblages of the conterminous USA.

Authors:  Arthur R Cooper; Dana M Infante; Wesley M Daniel; Kevin E Wehrly; Lizhu Wang; Travis O Brenden
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 7.963

9.  Adapting to climate change on Western public lands: addressing the ecological effects of domestic, wild, and feral ungulates.

Authors:  Robert L Beschta; Debra L Donahue; Dominick A DellaSala; Jonathan J Rhodes; James R Karr; Mary H O'Brien; Thomas L Fleischner; Cindy Deacon Williams
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 3.266

10.  Dry season habitat use of fishes in an Australian tropical river.

Authors:  K Keller; Q Allsop; J Brim Box; D Buckle; D A Crook; M M Douglas; S Jackson; M J Kennard; O J Luiz; B J Pusey; S A Townsend; A J King
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  2 in total

1.  Physical habitat in conterminous US streams and rivers, Part 1: Geoclimatic controls and anthropogenic alteration.

Authors:  Philip R Kaufmann; Robert M Hughes; Steven G Paulsen; David V Peck; Curt W Seeliger; Marc H Weber; Richard M Mitchell
Journal:  Ecol Indic       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 6.263

2.  Wood stock in neotropical streams: Quantifying and comparing instream wood among biomes and regions.

Authors:  Sarah O Saraiva; Ian D Rutherfurd; Philip R Kaufmann; Cecília G Leal; Diego R Macedo; Paulo S Pompeu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 3.752

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.