Literature DB >> 26789373

Understanding the controls on deposited fine sediment in the streams of agricultural catchments.

P S Naden1, J F Murphy2, G H Old1, J Newman1, P Scarlett1, M Harman1, C P Duerdoth2, A Hawczak2, J L Pretty2, A Arnold2, C Laizé1, D D Hornby3, A L Collins4, D A Sear5, J I Jones2.   

Abstract

Excessive sediment pressure on aquatic habitats is of global concern. A unique dataset, comprising instantaneous measurements of deposited fine sediment in 230 agricultural streams across England and Wales, was analysed in relation to 20 potential explanatory catchment and channel variables. The most effective explanatory variable for the amount of deposited sediment was found to be stream power, calculated for bankfull flow and used to index the capacity of the stream to transport sediment. Both stream power and velocity category were highly significant (p ≪ 0.001), explaining some 57% variation in total fine sediment mass. Modelled sediment pressure, predominantly from agriculture, was marginally significant (p<0.05) and explained a further 1% variation. The relationship was slightly stronger for erosional zones, providing 62% explanation overall. In the case of the deposited surface drape, stream power was again found to be the most effective explanatory variable (p<0.001) but velocity category, baseflow index and modelled sediment pressure were all significant (p<0.01); each provided an additional 2% explanation to an overall 50%. It is suggested that, in general, the study sites were transport-limited and the majority of stream beds were saturated by fine sediment. For sites below saturation, the upper envelope of measured fine sediment mass increased with modelled sediment pressure. The practical implications of these findings are that (i) targets for fine sediment loads need to take into account the ability of streams to transport/retain fine sediment, and (ii) where agricultural mitigation measures are implemented to reduce delivery of sediment, river management to mobilise/remove fines may also be needed in order to effect an improvement in ecological status in cases where streams are already saturated with fines and unlikely to self-cleanse.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Agricultural sediment pressure; Agricultural streams; Channel substrate; Deposited fine sediment; Saturated fine sediment fraction; Stream power

Year:  2016        PMID: 26789373     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  9 in total

Review 1.  A review of source tracking techniques for fine sediment within a catchment.

Authors:  Zhuo Guan; Xiang-Yu Tang; Jae E Yang; Yong Sik Ok; Zhihong Xu; Taku Nishimura; Brian J Reid
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Ecotoxicological assessment of the impact of fluoride (F-) and turbidity on the freshwater snail Physella acuta in a polluted river receiving an industrial effluent.

Authors:  Julio A Camargo; Álvaro Alonso
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Physical habitat in conterminous US streams and Rivers, part 2: A quantitative assessment of habitat condition.

Authors:  Philip R Kaufmann; Robert M Hughes; Steven G Paulsen; David V Peck; Curt W Seeliger; Tom Kincaid; Richard M Mitchell
Journal:  Ecol Indic       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 6.263

4.  Physical habitat in conterminous US streams and rivers, Part 1: Geoclimatic controls and anthropogenic alteration.

Authors:  Philip R Kaufmann; Robert M Hughes; Steven G Paulsen; David V Peck; Curt W Seeliger; Marc H Weber; Richard M Mitchell
Journal:  Ecol Indic       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 6.263

5.  Separating natural from human enhanced methane emissions in headwater streams.

Authors:  Yizhu Zhu; J Iwan Jones; Adrian L Collins; Yusheng Zhang; Louise Olde; Lorenzo Rovelli; John F Murphy; Catherine M Heppell; Mark Trimmer
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 17.694

6.  Sediment-associated organic matter sources and sediment oxygen demand in a Special Area of Conservation (SAC): A case study of the River Axe, UK.

Authors:  A L Collins; Y Zhang; S McMillan; E R Dixon; A Stringfellow; S Bateman; D A Sear
Journal:  River Res Appl       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 2.443

7.  The sources and dynamics of fine-grained sediment degrading the Freshwater Pearl Mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera) beds of the River Torridge, Devon, UK.

Authors:  S Pulley; A Goubet; I Moser; S Browning; A L Collins
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  Land use affects lowland stream ecosystems through dissolved oxygen regimes.

Authors:  Paula C Dos Reis Oliveira; Harm G van der Geest; Michiel H S Kraak; Piet F M Verdonschot
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Small Water Bodies in Great Britain and Ireland: Ecosystem function, human-generated degradation, and options for restorative action.

Authors:  William D Riley; Edward C E Potter; Jeremy Biggs; Adrian L Collins; Helen P Jarvie; J Iwan Jones; Mary Kelly-Quinn; Steve J Ormerod; David A Sear; Robert L Wilby; Samantha Broadmeadow; Colin D Brown; Paul Chanin; Gordon H Copp; Ian G Cowx; Adam Grogan; Duncan D Hornby; Duncan Huggett; Martyn G Kelly; Marc Naura; Jonathan R Newman; Gavin M Siriwardena
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 7.963

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.