| Literature DB >> 35990803 |
Fangda Si1, Shuo Yuan1, Lei Zang1, Ning Fan1, Qichao Wu1, Tianyi Wang1, Aobo Wang1.
Abstract
Background: The paraspinal muscle is essential for maintaining normal spine function and structure, which degeneration is closely related to various spinal diseases. The main objective of this study was to identify the potential role of paraspinal muscle degeneration in the occurrence of new vertebral compression fractures (NVCF) and develop a clinically applicable nomogram for prospective NVCF risk prediction.Entities:
Keywords: new vertebral compression fractures; nomogram; paraspinal muscle degeneration; percutaneous kyphoplasty; risk factors
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35990803 PMCID: PMC9385132 DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S374857
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Interv Aging ISSN: 1176-9092 Impact factor: 3.829
Figure 1Typical L4-L5 axial images.
Figure 2Flow chart for screening eligible patients.
Categorical Variables of NVCF and Non-NVCF Groups
| Categorical Variable | Total (n=202) | NVCF (n=54) | Non-NVCF (n=148) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | ||||
| Male | 53 (26.2%) | 9 (16.7%) | 44 (29.7%) | 0.062 |
| Female | 149 (73.8%) | 45 (83.3%) | 104 (70.3%) | |
| Treated vertebral level | ||||
| T-L junction | 132 (65.3%) | 32 (59.3%) | 100 (67.6%) | 0.272 |
| Non-T-L junction | 70 (34.7%) | 22 (40.7%) | 48 (32.4%) | |
| Menopausal status | ||||
| Premenopausal | 7 (4.7%) | 1 (2.2%) | 6 (5.8%) | 0.347 |
| Postmenopausal | 142 (95.3%) | 44 (97.8%) | 98 (94.2%) | |
| History of hypertension | ||||
| Yes | 109 (54.0%) | 33 (61.1%) | 76 (51.4%) | 0.218 |
| No | 93 (46.0%) | 21 (38.9%) | 72 (48.6%) | |
| History of diabetes | ||||
| Yes | 54 (26.7%) | 12 (22.2%) | 42 (28.4%) | 0.382 |
| No | 148 (73.3%) | 42 (77.8%) | 106 (71.6%) | |
| History of steroid use | ||||
| Yes | 9 (4.5%) | 3 (5.6%) | 6 (4.1%) | 0.647 |
| No | 193 (95.5) | 51 (94.4%) | 142 (95.9%) | |
| Smoking status | ||||
| Yes | 39 (19.3%) | 7 (13.0%) | 32 (21.6%) | 0.168 |
| No | 163 (80.7%) | 47 (87.0%) | 116 (78.4%) | |
| Presence of Kummell disease* | ||||
| Yes | 26 (12.9%) | 11 (20.4%) | 15 (10.1%) | 0.055 |
| No | 176 (87.1%) | 43 (79.6%) | 133 (89.9%) | |
| Intradiscal cement leakage | ||||
| Yes | 36 (17.8%) | 8 (14.8%) | 28 (18.9%) | 0.500 |
| No | 166 (82.2%) | 46 (85.2%) | 120 (81.1%) |
Notes: T-L junction indicates the junction between the 11th thoracic vertebra (T11) and the second lumbar vertebra (L2), *Gas within the vertebral body or an intravertebral vacuum cleft was identified as the presence of Kummell disease.
Abbreviation: NVCF, new vertebral compression fractures.
Continuous Variables of Patients in NVCF and Non-NVCF Group
| Continuous Variables | Group | Mean | SD | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | NVCF | 77.39 | 7.52 | <0.001 |
| Non-NVCF | 67.78 | 11.84 | ||
| Follow-up period (months) | NVCF | 25.94 | 13.61 | 0.873 |
| Non-NVCF | 26.30 | 14.48 | ||
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | NVCF | 24.29 | 5.39 | 0.691 |
| Non-NVCF | 24.57 | 4.05 | ||
| Bone mineral density (T-score) | NVCF | −3.35 | 1.05 | 0.155 |
| Non-NVCF | −3.09 | 1.17 | ||
| Cement volume (mL) | NVCF | 3.13 | 0.46 | 0.146 |
| Non-NVCF | 3.19 | 0.50 | ||
| Multifidus fat signal fraction (%) | NVCF | 52.63 | 15.48 | <0.001 |
| Non-NVCF | 32.41 | 12.21 | ||
| Erector spinae fat signal fraction (%) | NVCF | 53.37 | 12.61 | <0.001 |
| Non-NVCF | 34.84 | 12.24 | ||
| Psoas major fat signal fraction (%) | NVCF | 8.17 | 5.77 | <0.001 |
| Non-NVCF | 3.26 | 2.93 | ||
| CDI between multifidus and erector spinae (%) | NVCF | 31.21 | 22.16 | 0.492 |
| Non-NVCF | 29.13 | 17.79 | ||
| CDI between multifidus and psoas major (%) | NVCF | 43.80 | 16.78 | <0.001 |
| Non-NVCF | 26.58 | 20.34 | ||
| CDI between erector spinae and psoas major (%) | NVCF | 12.52 | 30.89 | <0.001 |
| Non-NVCF | −5.49 | 23.91 |
Abbreviations: NVCF, new vertebral compression fractures; SD, standard deviation; CDI, difference index of the cross-sectional area.
Multivariable Binary Logistic Regression of Predictors for NVCF
| Characteristic | Odds Ratio | 95% CI | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Erector spinae fat signal fraction (%) | 1.064 | 1.024–1.105 | 0.001 |
| Psoas major fat signal fraction (%) | 1.326 | 1.136–1.548 | <0.001 |
| CDI between multifidus and psoas major (%) | 1.048 | 1.023–1.074 | <0.001 |
Abbreviations: NVCF, new vertebral compression fractures; CI, confidence interval; CDI, difference index of the cross-sectional area.
Figure 3Nomogram for predicting the probability of the occurrence of NVCF.
Figure 4Receiver operating characteristic curve for NVCF nomogram.
Figure 5Validation of NVCF nomogram: calibration graph.