The different types of paper wastes constitute a major portion of municipal solid waste. The present study was aimed to justify the use of freshwater snails for the biological degradation of the paper waste and subsequent availability of cellulose from fecal matter. Three aquatic snails Racesina luteola, Indoplanorbis exustus, and Physella acuta were used to degrade newsprint, cardboard, and common writing paper as paper waste. The consumption of papers by the snail species was subjected to statistical analysis, and the results of Kruskal-Wallis test indicated a significant variation in the paper-specific consumption pattern (K = 181.762, df = 2, p <0.0001) and no variation in the species-specific pattern. Among the three types of paper used for the study, cardboard was consumed at the highest rate (4.655 ± 0.401 mg per day), and the per capita consumption remained highest for the snail I. exustus (2.253 ± 0.273 mg per day). The microscopic images and SEM micrographs of the consumed paper revealed prominent grazing and scraping marks by the snails. The disintegration and relaxation of the papers after consumption indicated that they were on the pathway to degradation. The traditional way of degrading paper waste includes physical, chemical, or microbial treatment of paper pulp. This study represents a novel approach considering the freshwater snails as model organisms for the biodegradation process. Considerable amount of cellulose was present in the fecal samples, which can be extracted and purified for utilization as potent raw material.
The different types of paper wastes constitute a major portion of municipal solid waste. The present study was aimed to justify the use of freshwater snails for the biological degradation of the paper waste and subsequent availability of cellulose from fecal matter. Three aquatic snails Racesina luteola, Indoplanorbis exustus, and Physella acuta were used to degrade newsprint, cardboard, and common writing paper as paper waste. The consumption of papers by the snail species was subjected to statistical analysis, and the results of Kruskal-Wallis test indicated a significant variation in the paper-specific consumption pattern (K = 181.762, df = 2, p <0.0001) and no variation in the species-specific pattern. Among the three types of paper used for the study, cardboard was consumed at the highest rate (4.655 ± 0.401 mg per day), and the per capita consumption remained highest for the snail I. exustus (2.253 ± 0.273 mg per day). The microscopic images and SEM micrographs of the consumed paper revealed prominent grazing and scraping marks by the snails. The disintegration and relaxation of the papers after consumption indicated that they were on the pathway to degradation. The traditional way of degrading paper waste includes physical, chemical, or microbial treatment of paper pulp. This study represents a novel approach considering the freshwater snails as model organisms for the biodegradation process. Considerable amount of cellulose was present in the fecal samples, which can be extracted and purified for utilization as potent raw material.
The use of nonbiodegradable plastics raises
concern about environmental
problems. As a substitute/alternative, the papers and cardboards are
considered in varied purposes including packaging, bearing the advantage
of biodegradability.[1] Owing to the overwhelming
use of papers in industries, markets, and households in varied forms
such as cardboards, writing paper, newspaper, paper towel, baking
paper, and so forth, a huge amount of paper waste is generated in
different cities and rural areas. Paper wastes constitute a significant
portion of the municipal solid wastes.[2−7] In India and in many other developing nations, paper wastes are
recyclable components in municipal solid waste,[3] originating from various sources, with about 34% attributable
to the packaging industry.[5,6] The continued demand
and utility of paper materials is evident from the increase of paper
waste in municipal solid waste from 3.63% in 1996 to 9.63% in 2011.[3] A further increase in paper waste is expected
considering the multiple advantages of paper in packaging or other
industries.[6]The paper wastes generated
from various sources can be reused as
an alternative source of cellulosic raw materials due to their easy
availability.[8,9] Using an appropriate treatment
procedure, the paper waste can lead to recycling and reuse in the
form of paper pulp to generate several biocommodities. Among the various
forms, the paper wastes can be processed physically, chemically, or
biologically to extract nano cellulose crystals and fibers.[8,9] In one sense, the reuse of the paper wastes will provide an extended
lifeline and elongate the life cycle of a product of biological origin.
As a waste, the degradation of paper or pulp would have added hazardous
material in the environment.In urban areas, the extensive landfill
disposals of the paper wastes
and mechanical and physical processed employed for paper degradation
may cause potential hazard to the environment and public health.[10] Besides, the paper and pulp mill effluents are
also toxic to aquatic ecosystems, affecting the growth, development,
reproduction, and behavioral responses of fishes and several other
riverine and marine plants and animals.[11−14] Thus, both manufacture and disposal
of papers involve potential environmental hazards, affecting the biota
and the environmental quality in general. In order to reduce the possible
hazards and sustain the paper production, an effective management
of paper wastes is required.[10,15,16] Among the various modes of thermochemical and mechanical processes
of paper and pulp treatment, majority are expensive and unable to
degrade specific compounds of paper wastes, such as lignin, which
persist in a different form following the treatments. In comparison,
the application of the biological treatments including vermicomposting
is safe environmentally and comparatively cost effective.[17−19] Such biodegradation, a biologically catalyzed transformation of
complex organic compounds into simple molecules,[20] facilitates the restoration of the environmental condition
with the reduction of environmental pollution.[21] Owing to the availability of a wide range of biological
resources, an advantage of choosing one or many of the biological
resources from natural habitat makes it a more feasible process.In recent times, the use of the cellulase enzyme obtained from
the terrestrial snail Cornu aspersum (O. F. Müller, 1774) (Gastropoda: Helicidae) in the degradation
of the cellulose of the paper wastes into glucose monomers has been
reported.[22] In view of the significance
of recycling of paper wastes, biological degradation seems to be a
feasible alternative. The snails and mussels in aquatic systems have
long been known as ecological indicators of water pollution.[23] The aquatic snails can monitor water quality
by absorbing hazardous metallic substances in their shells and tissue,[24−26] thus acting as ecosystem engineers.[27] In aquatic systems, snails thrive and graze over several substances
which float over the water. They are also found to remain attached
and thrive on submerged and floating paper materials. Based on this
observation, the present study was designed to assess the use of the
freshwater snails thriving in the lakes and ponds of West Bengal,
India, as a model organism for the degradation of paper waste. In
the present study, three freshwater snails, Racesina
luteola (Lamarck, 1822) (Gastropoda: Lymnaeidae), Indoplanorbis exustus (Deshayes, 1833) (Gastropoda:
Planorbidae), and Physella acuta (Draparnaud,
1805) (Gastropoda: Physidae) were considered as the model organism
for the degradation of the paper wastes. The native snail species R. luteola and I. exustus are responsible for spreading trematode-borne infections in animals
and men.[28−30] Another snail species, P. acuta is an indigenous species of North America but invaded globally in
freshwater ecosystems.[31] These freshwater
snails regulate the growth of periphyton, and macrophytes and shells
act as the site for algal and periphyton growth.[32] The ability of these snail species to degrade the papers
of three types, namely, cardboard (CB), newspaper (NP) , and plain
paper (PP), was assessed along with the amount of the cellulose present
in the degraded papers and fecal pellet of the snails fed with several
types of paper were also estimated. In general, the degradation of
paper waste includes mechanical and physical processes[16−18] or microbial activity.[33] The utilization
of freshwater snails for the biodegradation of paper waste is a pioneer
effort. The results are expected to highlight a prospective mechanism
of degradation of the paper wastes for either entry as an elemental
form in the biogeochemical cycle or enzymatic degradation into sugars.
The efficacy of the snails in facilitating the process of paper waste
degradation can be judged such that freshwater snails can be considered
for the biodegradation process.
Results
All the three species of freshwater snails,
namely, R. luteola, I. exustus, and P. acuta, consumed the three
different types of paper waste with considerable variations in amount
consumed. As a result of the grazing and scraping by the snails during
the feeding activity, prominent signs of degradation of the paper
samples were observed (Figure ). On a comparative scale, the per capita consumption of paper
wastes remained highest for the snail I. exustus (2.25 ± 0.27 mg/day), followed by R. luteola (1.99 ± 0.34 mg/day) and P. acuta (1.88 ± 0.26 mg/day) (Figure ). Among the three types of paper used for the study,
the CB was consumed (4.65 ± 0.40 mg/individual/day) at the highest
rate, while the NP was consumed (0.27 ± 0.02 mg/individual/day)
the least amount by the snails. For the PP, the mean amount consumed
was 1.19 ± 0.1 mg/individual/day. The consumption of papers by
the snails varied significantly in the paper-specific consumption
pattern as observed through the Kruskal–Wallis test (K = 181.762, df = 2, p = <0.0001) but no variation was observed in the species-specific
pattern (K = 2.727, df = 2, p = 0.256). Following the consumption, the snail species
produced a considerable amount of fecal pellets when CB was consumed
(1.32 ± 0.1 mg/individual/day) as food (Figure ) than for the NP(0.45 ± 0.05 mg/individual/day)
or PP (0.84 ± 0.08 mg/individual/day). On a comparative scale,
the fecal pellets produced by the snails were highest in I. exustus, followed by R. luteola and P. acuta, respectively. The results
of the Kruskal–Wallis test indicated that the fecal matter
egested by the snails remained significantly different based on the
paper types (K = 61.673, df = 2, p <0.0001) and the snail species (K = 15.982, df = 2, p = 0.0003)
concerned, but no significant variations were observed in the amount
of cellulose in the fecal pellets (Figure ).
Figure 1
Photographs (magnification 4×) of the surface
of paper (a)
cardboard, (b) plain paper, and (c) newspaper of (1) control (without
the presence of snails) and after 4 days of grazing and scraping activity
of (2) I. exustus, (3) R. luteola, and (4) P. acuta.
Figure 2
Amount of papers consumed by the snails of similar biomass,
expressed
in terms of the individuals and the individuals/day. (a,b) Consumption
of three snails as function of paper type; (c,d) consumption on three
types of paper as function of snail species; (e) bar plot representing
the consumption (mean ± SE) of three types of papers by three
snail species [Paper types: CB—cardboard, PP—plain paper,
and NP—newspaper; snail species: IEX—I. exustus; RLU—R. luteola and PAC—P. acuta]. SE = Standard
error.
Figure 3
Variations in the fecal matter egested by the snails
following
the consumption of papers, expressed in terms of the individuals (a,c)
and the individuals/day (b,d). [Paper types: CB—cardboard,
PP—plain paper, and NP—newspaper; snail species: IEX—I. exustus; RLU—R. luteola and PAC—P. acuta]. The box
plot represents the maximum and minimum and mean value (red lined
o) of consumption value along with the outliers.
Figure 4
Estimated amount of cellulose content (mean ± SE)
of the fecal
matter of the snails fed with different types of papers. (a) Cellulose
in the fecal samples as function of snail species; (b) cellulose in
the fecal samples as a function of paper types; (e) bar plot representing
the consumption (mean ± SE) of three types of papers by three
snail species [paper types: CB—cardboard, PP—plain paper,
and NP—newspaper; snail species: IEX—I. exustus; RLU—R. luteola and PAC—P. acuta].
Photographs (magnification 4×) of the surface
of paper (a)
cardboard, (b) plain paper, and (c) newspaper of (1) control (without
the presence of snails) and after 4 days of grazing and scraping activity
of (2) I. exustus, (3) R. luteola, and (4) P. acuta.Amount of papers consumed by the snails of similar biomass,
expressed
in terms of the individuals and the individuals/day. (a,b) Consumption
of three snails as function of paper type; (c,d) consumption on three
types of paper as function of snail species; (e) bar plot representing
the consumption (mean ± SE) of three types of papers by three
snail species [Paper types: CB—cardboard, PP—plain paper,
and NP—newspaper; snail species: IEX—I. exustus; RLU—R. luteola and PAC—P. acuta]. SE = Standard
error.Variations in the fecal matter egested by the snails
following
the consumption of papers, expressed in terms of the individuals (a,c)
and the individuals/day (b,d). [Paper types: CB—cardboard,
PP—plain paper, and NP—newspaper; snail species: IEX—I. exustus; RLU—R. luteola and PAC—P. acuta]. The box
plot represents the maximum and minimum and mean value (red lined
o) of consumption value along with the outliers.Estimated amount of cellulose content (mean ± SE)
of the fecal
matter of the snails fed with different types of papers. (a) Cellulose
in the fecal samples as function of snail species; (b) cellulose in
the fecal samples as a function of paper types; (e) bar plot representing
the consumption (mean ± SE) of three types of papers by three
snail species [paper types: CB—cardboard, PP—plain paper,
and NP—newspaper; snail species: IEX—I. exustus; RLU—R. luteola and PAC—P. acuta].Apparently, following the consumption of paper
materials, the snails
assimilated some amount of cellulose within the body and released
some amount in the fecal matter. The relative mortality of the snails
in course of the experiment remained consistent but negligible. The
snails produced considerable egg clutches (Figure ) during the experimental period, indicating
that the snails were adapted to the consumption and assimilation of
the paper as a source of food. The egg production was high on PP diet
for P. acuta (20 ± 5.43) and R. luteola (46.14 ± 18.40), but I. exustus did not oviposit when fed with PP. The
fecundity was also high on CB diet with the production of egg clutches
29.7 ± 0.68 by P. acuta, 33.36
± 7.45 by R. luteola, and I. exustus deposited only one clutch with 17 eggs.
The total egg production as a function of snail species and paper
types could be presented as follows: total egg = 1/{1 + exp[−(−5.149–0.324
* snail species + 0.253 * paper type)]}, with model parameters being
significant (intercept = −5.149 ± 0.077, Wald χ2 = 4428.153, p < 0.0001; snail species
= −0.324 ± 0.026, Wald χ2 = 148.466, p < 0.0001; paper type = 0.253 ± 0.026, Wald χ2 = 92.461, p < 0.0001). The relation of
egg per clutch with the snail species and paper types could be presented
as follows: egg/clutch = 1/{1 + exp[−(−6.022–0.104*
snail species+ 0.462* paper type)]}, and the model parameters were
significant (intercept = −6.022 ± 0.109, Wald χ2 = 3014.529, p < 0.0001; snail species
= −0.104 ± 0.034, Wald χ2 = 9.29, p = 0.002; paper type = 0.462 ± 0.036, Wald χ2 = 164.123, p < 0.0001). The regression
equation of egg per individual could be presented as follows: egg/individual
= 1/{1 + exp[−(−5.145–0.324* snail species +
0.253* paper type)]} with the significant model parameters (intercept
= −5.145 ± 0.204, Wald χ2 = 634.108, p < 0.0001; snail species = −0.324 ± 0.07,
Wald χ2 = 21.209, p < 0.0001;
paper type = 0.253 ± 0.069, Wald χ2 = 13.208, p = 0.0002). Thus, following the consumption of the paper
as a food, the snails were able to survive and reproduce and the degradation
of the paper was also achieved.
Figure 5
Fecundity of the three snail species (IEX—I. exustus; RLU—R. luteola; and PAC—P. acuta) fed with
three different types of papers [CB—cardboard, PP—plain
paper, and NP—newspaper].
Fecundity of the three snail species (IEX—I. exustus; RLU—R. luteola; and PAC—P. acuta) fed with
three different types of papers [CB—cardboard, PP—plain
paper, and NP—newspaper].The disintegration and stretching of the fibrous
structure of the
papers due to the scraping by the snails were prominent in the scanning
electron micrographs of the paper samples (Figure ). The scanning electron micrographs (Figure ) revealed the presence
of paper fibers in the fecal samples also. Figure shows the band intensity and absorbance
of CB, PP, and NPs without (control) and after the grazing and scraping
of snails, along with the fecal matter after the consumption of respective
papers. The CB, PP, and NPs showed the presence of characteristic
bands of pyran vibrations at ∼800 cm–1, C–H
out-of-plane bend at 873–876 cm–1, aromatic
C–H at 1031–1034 cm–1, C–O–C
asymmetric vibrations at ∼1162 cm–1, C=O
stretch at ∼1261 cm–1, and aromatic skeletal
vibrations combined with C–H at ∼1428 cm–1.[34−36] In comparison to the spectra of control, change in the wavenumber
and/or absorbance of characteristics bands were observed on the paper
samples, which indicated the chemical and physical changes[35,36] of the papers following the grazing and scrapping activities of
the snails. An additional band of CH2 rocking vibration
at ∼712 cm–1 in cellulose[35] was observed on the fecal matters following the consumption
of respective papers.
Figure 6
SEM images of the three types of papers (a) cardboard,CB,
(b) plain
paper, PP, (c) and newspaper, NP of control set (1) and after 4 days
of the grazing and scraping activity by I. exustus (2), R. luteola (3), and P. acuta (4). Magnification = 500×, Scale bar
= 50 μm.
Figure 7
SEM images of the fecal pellets of (1) I. exustus, (2) R. luteola, and (3) P. acuta fed with three
types of papers: (a) cardboard
- CB, (b) plain paper - PP, and (c) newspaper - NP. Note the looseness
of the fibers contrast to those of Figure . Magnification = 500×, scale bar =
50 μm.
Figure 8
FTIR spectrum of (a) cardboard - CB, (b) plain paper -
PP, and
(c) newspaper - NPs without (control) and after the grazing and scraping
of three snail species, along with the fecal matter after the consumption
of respective papers. No absorbance scale is given in the plots as
the FTIR spectra of the samples are normalized and shifted parallel
to the x-axis.
SEM images of the three types of papers (a) cardboard,CB,
(b) plain
paper, PP, (c) and newspaper, NP of control set (1) and after 4 days
of the grazing and scraping activity by I. exustus (2), R. luteola (3), and P. acuta (4). Magnification = 500×, Scale bar
= 50 μm.SEM images of the fecal pellets of (1) I. exustus, (2) R. luteola, and (3) P. acuta fed with three
types of papers: (a) cardboard
- CB, (b) plain paper - PP, and (c) newspaper - NP. Note the looseness
of the fibers contrast to those of Figure . Magnification = 500×, scale bar =
50 μm.FTIR spectrum of (a) cardboard - CB, (b) plain paper -
PP, and
(c) newspaper - NPs without (control) and after the grazing and scraping
of three snail species, along with the fecal matter after the consumption
of respective papers. No absorbance scale is given in the plots as
the FTIR spectra of the samples are normalized and shifted parallel
to the x-axis.
Discussion
In respect to the use of the biological
resources, the degradation
of the paper wastes appears to be less costly.[37] Microbe-derived cellulose degrading enzymes are often utilized
for the degeneration of paper materials.[17,38] The bacterial and fungal species isolated from the several metropolitan
wastes produced considerable amount of glucose from the paper wastes.[33] Waste degradation using earthworm Eisenia foetida through vermicomposting process is
another potential way of waste management.[39,40] Another study depicted that the degradation of paper cup waste was
accelerated through vermicomposting process with bacteria and earthworm Eudrillus eugeinea.[41,42] In recent
years, the use of the cellulase enzyme obtained from the terrestrial
snail C. aspersum(22,43,44) in degradation of varied types of paper
wastes indicates the significance of the snails[45] in the bioremediation program of recovery and reuse of
paper waste at a larger scale. In parity with the propositions of
the use of the snails in the bioremediation of the paper waste, the
present study is a pioneer effort to establish the potential of the
freshwater snails in the recovery and the reuse of the cellulose present
in the paper wastes, which otherwise would have added to the total
pollution as a solid waste load.The considerable decrease of
weight of experimental papers used
as food material of the snails within the experimental mesocosm indicates
their ability to reduce the load of paper wastes from the environment.
Among the three snail species, the consumption rate was highest for I. exustus. The CB paper was consumed at a higher
rate than other two papers used for the experiment. As shown in the
scanning electron microscopy (SEM) pictures, the disintegration and
laxation of the paper’s fibers were prominent in the consumed
paper samples in comparison with the control (kept in water only)
paper samples. The cellulosic components of the consumed papers were
digested through the enzymatic degradation within the gut of the snails.
Part of the cellulosic materials of the experimental papers were assimilated
within the snail body for energy production and the amount of cellulose
that had been detected in the fecal matter of the snail species was
the undigested part of lignocellulosic materials of the paper. The
presence of paper fibers in the fecal pellets of the snails fed with
papers was evident from the SEM micrographs. Thus, grazing and scraping
by the snails over the paper waste will initiate the primary processing
which will augment the degradation process in the natural environment.
The release of loose and disintegrated paper fibers through the fecal
pellets will facilitate the microbial growth and enzymatic degradation
or physical transformation. The degradation of paper waste using snails
will reduce the biomass and process the solid wastes. The microbial
activity on partially processed paper materials will eventually release
the cellulose and glucose molecules which will be further degraded
by microbes or physical transformation.Several studies reported
that the recycled cellulose fibers from
pulp of paper wastes are a promising and sustainable source of biofuel,
bio-ethanol,[46] and other bio-commodities
such as porous graphen,[47] water-soluble
fluorescent carbon dots,[48] graphene oxide
quantum dots[49] multifunctional carbon decorated
graphene paper,[50] porous carbon dots for
tetracycline absorption,[51] and metal recover
by chemically modified paper waste pulp.[52,53] The cellulose fibers from paper pulp are also being used as an aerogel
to mitigate environmental problems such as oil spill cleaning.[2,54] The paper wastes are also a promising source of nanocellulose which
are now being used for multiple industrial sectors.[8,9] In
the present study, the loose, disintegrated cellulose fibers can be
extracted and purified following a proper methodology so that it can
be utilized as potent raw material at a commercial level.The
three snail species were able to survive and reproduce consuming
only papers as food which indicates their efficacy in degradation
of paper wastes. Therefore, further studies may be initiated to judge
the efficacy of the snails under varied environmental conditions to
degrade and process the paper waste. In addition, future study should
be designed to assess the variations of life history traits of snail
species fed with papers. Based on the effects of the paper wastes
on the life history and ecological traits of freshwater snail species
within their aquatic habitats, it can be discerned whether snail species
can be effectively used for alleviation of pollutant load in aquatic
systems.
Conclusions
The three freshwater snail species R. luteola, I. exustus, and P.
acuta efficiently consumed three types of paper—cardboard,
newspaper, and plain writing paper which are common components of
municipal solid wastes. The snail species oviposited a considerable
number of egg clutches during the experimental period, reflecting
their ability of survival and reproduction while feeding on paper
diet only. The amount of cellulose obtained from the fecal pellet
of the snails can be extracted and purified for further utilization
as raw material in commercial purposes. The degradation of paper waste
using snails will reduce the biomass and process the solid wastes.
The microbial activity on partially processed paper materials will
eventually release the cellulose and glucose molecules which will
be further degraded by microbes or by physical transformation.Though the snail species were able to degrade the paper waste under
laboratory conditions, future study should be designed to judge their
efficacy in biodegradation of paper waste in natural or semi-natural
habitats.
Materials and Methods
Snail Collection and Maintenance
The snails were collected
from the freshwater habitats in and around Kolkata and adjacent districts
of West Bengal, India during the experimental period, between May
and September 2018. A nylon insect collection net fitted in a circular
iron frame of 40 cm diameter attached with a long handle was dragged
along the surface and subsurface (∼15–20 cm depth) of
the ponds, bogs, and pools for the collection of R.
luteola and I. exustus. The collection of the snail P. acuta was made from the sewage drains of the same area using a smaller
net fitted to a rectangular frame of 10 × 30 cm size. In all
instances, the collections were made from the different sites of the
water bodies and the specimens were pooled into a plastic bag and
brought to the laboratory. In the laboratory, the snails were placed
in a plastic container (Tarson) following segregation of the respective
species. The containers were adequately filled with tap water (pH—7.2–7.5)
and the snails were maintained at room temperature (27–30 °C).
In the course of maintenance of the snails, lettuce leaves were provided ad libitum as food. At the end of every 24 h period, the
water of the containers was replaced and the dead snails and food
remnants were discarded to keep the culture container clean. The collection
of the snails was continued during the period of the experiment to
replenish the dead snails and keep the population of the respective
species at a constant number. In all instances, irrespective of the
species, snail individuals were kept in at least a 96 h period in
the laboratory for acclimatization prior to their use in the experiments.
Experimental Design
In order to assess the consumption
and resultant reduction in the biomass of the papers, three different
types of papers were considered, namely, the newspaper (NP, from local
newspaper), the plain writing paper (PP, A4 sized paper), and the
cardboard (CB, from industrial cartons). The requisite amount of the
papers was provided as food to each of the three types of snail species
and a long-term assessment was made regarding the change in the biomass
and thus degradation. The experiments were carried out in plastic
containers of 2 L volume, serving as individual mesocosms. Seven individuals
of each snail species were considered for each type of paper. For
each snail species and the paper source, six replicates were considered.
The size range of the snails used for the experiment was shell length
of 8.9–12.1 mm for R. luteola, 8–10 mm for P. acuta, and
9.1–14.9 mm for I. exustus.
In a particular mesocosm, the individual snail of a particular species
was placed along with a known quantity (representing its dry weight
in milligrams) of one type of paper. At the end of the 96 h period,
the paper was taken out and allowed to dry, and subsequently, the
biomass was recorded. After that, the paper was placed in the same
replicate. The fecal pellets were collected through sieving the water
of the mesocosm and allowed to dry for subsequent measurement of the
biomass and the analysis of the cellulose content. The observations
for all mesocosms were continued for at least seven times for each
species and with each type of the paper source. While considering
the replicates, the snail individuals and the paper sources were selected
following the norms of randomization and interspersion, such that
each of the observations constitute a true replicate.[55]Apart from these six replicates, another set of mesocosms
was built with three paper types for each snail species. A control
set was considered by placing the only three papers in water. From
these mesocosms, after 4 days of consumption, three paper types and
fecal matter of the snails were collected and dried in a hot air oven.
These consumed paper types along with the papers from the control
set were photographed in a binocular microscope (SZ2-ILST, Olympus,
Japan) fitted with a digital camera (DGI 510, Dewinter, India).
Cellulose estimation
The amount of the cellulose in
the fecal matter was estimated to justify the degradation of the supplied
paper. Estimation of the cellulose included acid digestion and removal
of the hemicellulose and other components and estimation of the cellulose
portion of the concerned material. The method employed for the extraction
of lignin, hemicelluloses, and xylosens using acetic acid/nitric acid
reagent and the remaining portion, the cellulose is dissolved in sulfuric
acid and estimated using the anthrone reagent.[56,57]
SEM and Fourier Transform Infrared Studies
The CB,
PP, and NPs (with and without the grazing and scraping of the snails)
along with the fecal matter of the snails were picked from the experimental
container on the fourth day. All samples were dried in a hot air oven,
and small pieces of papers and few fecal pellets were platinum-coated
and respective micrographs were taken by a scanning electron microscope
(EVO 18 special edition, Zeiss) to observe the surface structure and
morphology. The SEM studies were carried out professionally at CRNN
instrument facility, University of Calcutta, Salt Lake campus, Kolkata,
India. The completely dried paper samples and fecal pellets (1.0 mg)
were mixed with KBr (100 mg, IR spectroscopic grade, Sigma-Aldrich)
and thoroughly mixed in mortar and pastels. The 13 mm KBr pellets
were made from the mixture using a standard hydraulic press device
under a pressure of 100 kN cm–2 for Fourier transform
infrared (FTIR) spectrum analysis. FTIR spectra of the pellets were
recorded in the range of 500–2000 cm–1 on
a PerkinElmer Spectrum 1000 FTIR Spectrophotometer at 1 cm–1 resolution. A part of the FTIR work was carried out professionally
at the Central Instrument Facility, Bose Institute, Kolkata, India.
Data Analysis
The data obtained on the amount of the
paper consumed by the snails, the fecal matter produced, and the amount
of cellulose in the fecal matter were subjected to non-parametric
Kruskal–Wallis test[58] using the
paper and snail types as the explanatory variables. In all instances,
the data were represented as per capita consumption or per capita
per day consumption and subsequently applied for the statistical analysis
using XLSTAT software.[59] The fecundity of the snails was also recorded during the experimental
period in order to assess their ability to reproduce when they were
provided with a paper diet. The data obtained on the total eggs, egg
per clutch, and egg per individual were subjected to logistic regression
following a binomial generalized linear model with logit link.[60] The expression of the logistic regression in
the form of y (response variable) = 1/{1 + exp[−(−a + bx)]} was used to deduce the effect
of food type (types of paper) and snail species (explanatory variable)
on the fecundity (response variable) of each snail species.
Authors: Sang Youn Oh; Dong Il Yoo; Younsook Shin; Hwan Chul Kim; Hak Yong Kim; Yong Sik Chung; Won Ho Park; Ji Ho Youk Journal: Carbohydr Res Date: 2005-10-31 Impact factor: 2.104
Authors: L Mark Hewitt; Tibor G Kovacs; Monique G Dubé; Deborah L MacLatchy; Pierre H Martel; Mark E McMaster; Michael G Paice; Joanne L Parrott; Michael R van den Heuvel; Glen J van der Kraak Journal: Environ Toxicol Chem Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 3.742