| Literature DB >> 35990147 |
Abstract
To improve the efficiency of scientific assessment of cadre performance, first, this work analyzes the current situation of cadre performance appraisal in the free trade zone under the background of big data, and introduces the free trade zone and Random Forest (RF) algorithm. Second, based on the cadre evaluation index, this work establishes the cadre performance evaluation system of the free trade zone. Finally, the random forest algorithm model is implemented for the performance evaluation of cadres in the free trade zone. Additionally, the model's performance is verified with the actual data, including the acquisition of the best parameters and the most important indicators of the model and the performance comparison between the RF algorithm and other models. The results show that the performance of cadres in the free trade zone is finally divided into four grades: medium, good, qualified, and excellent. There are obvious grade differences in the performance of cadres in the free trade zone. Partly because some qualified cadres lack a strong sense of competition and professional competence, do not publicize the work of cadres in the free trade zone, and do not communicate with the masses in time. In the data processing, 18 missing experimental data were supplemented, and the best model parameters were obtained as follows: NTree = 200, MTry = 1. The most important indicators of cadre performance evaluation are the construction of a clean and honest government, the ability to act in accordance with the law and the professional ability. The accuracy of the RF algorithm obtained here is 71.4%. The prediction accuracy of the RF algorithm for the overall sample, training sample, and test sample is 94%, 96%, and 86%, respectively, which are higher than those of other common models. A RF algorithm with good classification effect is obtained and this work provides a reference for the scientific management of cadre performance appraisal.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35990147 PMCID: PMC9391096 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6964582
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Figure 1General framework of performance evaluation indexes for cadres in the free trade zone.
Performance evaluation indexes of cadres in the free trade zone.
| Classification index | Single index |
|---|---|
| Ability to perform duties | Economic development, people's living standards, social development, and ecological environment |
|
| |
| Key work of the free trade zone | The key work of each district, street, and town unit around the central work |
|
| |
| Routine work | Routine work carried out by district and street units |
|
| |
| Mass satisfaction | Act per the law, make pragmatic innovations, make scientific innovations, build grass-roots democratic politics, comprehensively manage social security, expand employment and social security, manage primary and secondary education, and improve the production and living environment |
|
| |
| Leading cadres' self-test indexes | Leadership, construction of party style and clean government, and ideological and political construction |
|
| |
| Evaluation index of moral and talent quality of leading cadres | Professional competency and policy level |
Figure 2Implementation of RF algorithm.
Figure 3Data processing process of RF algorithm.
Data set clustering result distribution.
| Classification | Data proportion (%) |
|---|---|
| Cluster 0 | 23.9 |
| Cluster 1 | 19.6 |
| Cluster 2 | 20.7 |
| Cluster 3 | 35.9 |
Figure 4Data distribution results. (a) represents the distribution result of the “economic development” data set, and (b) indicates the distribution result of the “people's living standards” data set.
Figure 5Analysis results of optimal parameters.
Index importance scores.
| Index serial number | Fractional value |
|---|---|
| Economic development | 3.2 |
| People's living standards | 3.4 |
| Social development | 2.2 |
| Ecological environment | 1.4 |
| The key work of each district, street, and town unit around the central work | 3.8 |
| Routine work carried out by district and street units | 2.8 |
| Handling affairs according to law | 4.3 |
| Pragmatic innovation | 3.5 |
| Scientific innovation | 3.9 |
| Grassroots democratic political construction | 2.9 |
| Maintain public security in a comprehensive way | 2.7 |
| Expand employment and social security | 1.4 |
| Primary and secondary education management | 1.8 |
| Improve production and living environment | 2.5 |
| Leadership | 3.9 |
| Construction of party style and clean government | 4.5 |
| Professional competency | 4.2 |
| Political and ideological construction | 3.7 |
| Policy level | 2.9 |
Figure 6Comparison between prediction grade and true grade of the RF model.
Figure 7Comparison of prediction accuracy of different models.