| Literature DB >> 35989914 |
Zhangming Zhou1, Junyi Zeng1, Shui Yu1, Ying Zhao2, Xiaoyi Yang3, Yiren Zhou4, Qingle Liang5.
Abstract
Objectives: Serum neurofilament light chain (NfL) is a biomarker for neuroaxonal damage, and S100B is a blood marker for cerebral damage. In the present study, we investigated the relationship between serum NfL and S100B levels, severity, and outcomes in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH).Entities:
Keywords: S100B; aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage; biomarkers; neurofilament protein light; prognosis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35989914 PMCID: PMC9381989 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.956043
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.086
Figure 1Representative head computed tomography (CT) scan of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). (A) The head CT scans of a patient with a Hunt-Hess grade IV aSAH with global and focal edema. (B) The head CT scans of an aSAH patient with a Hunt-Hess grade III with hydrocephalus. (C) The head CT scans of an aSAH patient with a Hunt-Hess grade II without edema or hydrocephalus. NfL (D) and S100B (E) levels were significantly elevated in the serum of aSAH patients compared with control patients at each period. Ultrasensitive Simoa and ELISA results showed significant differences between the health group and patients with different Hunt-Hess grades. ***P < 0.001.
Baseline demographics and clinical findings of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
| 53.49 ± 4.26 | 59.65 ± 6.15 | <0.01 | |
|
| 54/37 | 33/20 | 19/19 | |
| H-H grade | ||||
| I-II | 47 (51.65%) | 44 | 3 | <0.01 |
| III-V | 44 (48.35%) | 9 | 35 | |
| WFNS score | ||||
| Good (I–III) | 61 (67.03%) | 53 | 8 | <0.01 |
| Poor (IV–V) | 30 (32.97%) | 0 | 30 | |
| Fisher Grade, | ||||
| 2 | 35 (38.46%) | 33 | 2 | <0.01 |
| 3 | 40 (43.96%) | 20 | 20 | |
| 4 | 16 (17.58%) | 0 | 16 | <0.01 |
| Brain edema, | 31 (34.07%) | 16 | 15 | |
| Hydrocephalus, | 29 (31.90%) | 9 | 17 | <0.01 |
| CVS, n (%) | 38(41.80%) | 9 | 29 | <0.01 |
| 89 | ||||
| ACoA | 30 (32.97%) | 22 | 8 | |
| ICA | 36 (39.56%) | 30 | 6 | |
| ACA | 2 (2.20) | 1 | 1 | |
| MCA | 15 (16.50) | 9 | 6 | |
| Vert.A | 2 (2.20) | 1 | 1 | |
| PICA | 1 (1.10) | 1 | 0 | |
| BA | 2 (2.20) | 1 | 1 | |
| SCA | 1 (1.10) | 1 | 0 | |
| PCA | 2 (2.20) | 1 | 1 |
Mean ± SD, aSAH, aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, ACA, anterior cerebral artery, ACoA, anterior communicating artery, ICA, internal carotid artery, mRS, modified Rankins Score, MCA, middle cerebral artery, PCoA, posterior communicating artery, PICA, posterior inferior cerebellar artery, SCA, superior cerebellar artery, Vert.A, vertebral artery, BA, basilar artery, PCA, posterior cerebral artery, H-H grade, Hunt-Hess grade, CVS, cerebral vasospasm, WFNS score, World Federation of Neurological Surgeons, WBC, white blood cells, APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time, INR, International Normalized Ratio.
Figure 2Box plots of concentrations of inflammatory cytokines classified by Hunt-Hess grade, World Federation of Neurological Surgeons (WFNS) grade, and Fisher grade. The serum NfL and S100B levels in patients with aSAH were considerably different from those various evaluations of neurological diseases. (A) The higher levels of serum NfL and S100B were detected in aSAH patients with H-H grades III and IV, compared with gradesIand II at each time point (P < 0.01). (B) Serum NfL and S100B levels were much higher in aSAH patients with WFNS scores of 4 and 5 than those with WFNS scores of 1–3 at each time point (P < 0.0001). (C) The serum NfL and S100B concentrations in aSAH patients differed significantly in various Fisher grades at each time point (P < 0.05). All data were presented as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001.
Figure 3(A–D) The levels of aSAH patients serum NfL (Day 0, r = 0.8059, Day 1, r = 0.6550, Day 3, r = 0.5960, and Days 10–12, r = 0.6468, respectively; P < 0.0001), (E–H) S100B (Day 0, r = 0.6530, Day 1, r = 0.5554, Day 3, r = 0.6200, and Days 10–12, r = 0.6345, respectively; P < 0.0001) were significantly correlated with modified Rankin scale scores at each time points.
Figure 4Line charts of concentration of NfL (A) and S100B (B) in serum after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage at each time point. Both concentrations were significantly higher in those with poor outcomes than in good outcomes (P < 0.0001). All data were presented as mean ± SEM. ****P < 0.0001.
Figure 5(A,B) Receiver operating characteristics revealed a sensitivity/specificity of NfL and S100B. The areas under curves for the levels of NfL and S100B in the serum were 0.959 and 0.912, respectively; the clinical diagnostic critical points were 14.275 and 26.54 pg/ml, respectively; sensibilities were 0.974 and 0.921, respectively, and specificities were 0.849 and 0.811, respectively.