| Literature DB >> 35987789 |
Huabin Wang1,2, Ting Cui1,2, Dingxiang Chen1,2, Qiong Luo1,2, Jiwei Xu1,2, Rong Sun1,2, Wenhua Zi1,2, Rui Xu3,4, Ying Liu5,6, Yong Zhang7,8.
Abstract
The widely spread chromium (Cr) contamination is rising environmental concerns, while the reutilization of agro-industrial by-products are also urgently demanded due to their potential risks. In this study, we prepared the integrated micro-electrolysis composites (IMC) through a facile one-pot method with red mud and rice straw. The effects of components relatively mass ratios as well as pyrolysis temperature were analyzed. The XRD, XPS, SEM, FTIR, and various techniques proved the IMC was successfully synthesized, which was also used to analyze the reaction mechanisms. In this study, the dosage of IMC, pH, adsorption time, and temperature of adsorption processes were explored, in the adsorption experiment of Cr(VI), dosage of IMC was 2 g/L (pH 6, 25 °C, and 200 rpm) for isothermal, while the concentration and contact time were also varied. According to the batch experiments, IMC exhibited acceptable removal capacity (190.6 mg/g) on Cr(VI) and the efficiency reached 97.74%. The removal mechanisms of adsorbed Cr(VI) were mainly elaborated as chemical reduction, complexation, co-precipitation, and physical adherence. All these results shed light on the facile preparation and agro-industrial by-products recycled as engineering materials for the heavy metals decontamination in wastewater.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35987789 PMCID: PMC9392804 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-18598-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Figure 1XRD patterns (a), (b) and the high-resolution C 1 s, Fe 2p spectra of IMC (c), (d).
Figure 2SEM–EDS analysis of IMC (a–e), Fourier transform infrared spectra (FT-IR) at different ratios of IMC800 (f).
Figure 3Removal capacity of various IMC materials (a), Influence of dosage on removing Cr(VI)of IMC (b), pH and Zeta potential determination (c), (d).
Figure 4Influence of contact time on Cr(VI) sorption by IMC800-1 (a), the fit results of Langmuir and Freundlich models for IMC800-1 (b–d).
Quasi-first-order and quasi-second-order kinetic model, isothermal and thermodynamics fitting parameters of IMC for Cr(VI) adsorption.
| Adsorbent | Pseudo-first-order | Pseudo-second-order | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| qe (mg/g) | k1 (min−1) | R2 | qe (mg/g) | k2 (g/(mg min)) | R2 | |
| RMBC800-1 | 63.14 | 0.003 | 0.999 | 78.98 | 0.336 | 0.991 |
Figure 5XRD patterns of IMC800-1 before and after adsorption (a), FTIR before and after adsorption (b).
Figure 6XPS spectra of IMC800-1 before and after Cr(VI) adsorption: (a), (b) C 1 s, (c), (d) Fe 2p, (e) Cr 2p, (f) Full spectra.
Figure 7Adsorption mechanism of Cr(VI) by IMC.
Comparison of parameters of different materials for Cr(VI) adsorption.
| Adsorbent | Metal source | Preparation | Conditions | qmax (mg/g) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| nZVI-RS | FeSO4·7H2O | 600 °C, 2 h | pH 3.0–8.0 | 40.0 | [ |
| nZVI-HBC | FeSO4·7H2O | 700 °C, 2 h | pH 3.0 | 96.0 | [ |
| S-nZVI/BC | FeCl·4H2O | 400 °C, 3 h | pH2.5 | 126.0 | [ |
| SSB-nZVI | FeCl2·4H2O | NaBH4 | pH 4.0 | 20.0 | [ |
| MMBC | Red mud | 700 °C, 2 h | pH 3.0 | 99.8 | [ |
| IMC | Red mud, rice straw | 800 °C, 1 h | pH 6.0 | 190.6 | This work |