| Literature DB >> 28285109 |
Haoran Dong1, Junmin Deng2, Yankai Xie2, Cong Zhang2, Zhao Jiang2, Yujun Cheng2, Kunjie Hou2, Guangming Zeng2.
Abstract
Three types of modified biochar (BC) were produced respectively with acid (HCl) treatment (HCl-BC), base (KOH) treatment (KOH-BC) and oxidation (H2O2) treatment (H2O2-BC) of raw biochar. Both the raw biochar and modified biochars supported zero valent iron nanopartilces (nZVI) (i.e. nZVI@BC, nZVI@HCl-BC, nZVI@KOH-BC and nZVI@H2O2-BC) were synthesized and their capacities for Cr(VI) removal were compared. The results showed that the nZVI@HCl-BC exhibited the best performance and the underlying mechanisms were discussed. The surface elemental distribution maps of the nZVI@HCl-BC after reaction with Cr(VI) showed that Fe, Cr and O elements were deposited on the surface of HCl-BC evenly, indicating that the formed Cr(III)/Fe(III) could settle on the surface of HCl-BC uniformly rather than coated only on the nZVI surface. This reveals that the supporter HCl-BC could also play a role in alleviating the passivation of nZVI. Besides, the effects of mass ratio (nZVI/HCl-BC), pH, and initial Cr(VI) concentration on Cr(VI) removal were examined. At lower mass of HCl-BC, nZVI aggregation cannot be fully inhibited on the surface of HCl-BC, whereas excessive biochar can block the active sites of nZVI. Additionally, it was found that Cr(VI) removal by nZVI@HCl-BC was dependent on both pH and initial Cr(VI) concentration.Entities:
Keywords: Biochar; Chromium removal; Modification; Nanoscale zero-valent iron; Reduction
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28285109 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.03.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Hazard Mater ISSN: 0304-3894 Impact factor: 10.588