| Literature DB >> 35986431 |
Yongze Li1, Jianyu Wu1, Peizhuo Yang2, Lizhong Song2, Jun Wang2, Zhiguang Xing1, Jianwen Zhao1.
Abstract
Microwaves have become a promising wireless driving strategy due to the advantages of transmissivity through obstacles, fast energy targeting, and selective heating. Although there are some studies on microwave powered artificial muscles based on different structures, the lack of studies on microwave control has limited the development of microwave-driven (MWD) robots. Here, a far-field MWD parallel robot controlled by adjusting energy distribution via changing the polarization direction of microwaves at 2.47 GHz is first reported. The parallel robot is based on three double-layer bending actuators composed of wave-absorbing sheets and bimetallic sheets, and it can implement circular and triangular path at a distance of 0.4 m under 700 W transmitting power. The thermal response rate of the actuator under microwaves is studied, and it is found that the electric-field components can provide a faster thermal response at the optimal length of actuator than magnetic-field components. The work of the parallel robot is demonstrated in an enclosed space composed of microwave-transparent materials. This developed method demonstrates the multi-degree-of-freedom controllability for robots using microwaves and offers potential solutions for some engineering cases, such as pipeline/reactors inspection and medical applications.Entities:
Keywords: SMA actuator; microwave directional heating; microwave-driven robot; passive robot
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35986431 PMCID: PMC9561789 DOI: 10.1002/advs.202203305
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Sci (Weinh) ISSN: 2198-3844 Impact factor: 17.521
Brief evaluation of various untethered driving methods for robots
| Category | Actuation method | Advantages for applications | Application scenarios | Major limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnetic | Quasi‐static magnetic fields | High response rate; high accuracy; better penetration; security of human–computer interaction[
| Targeted drug delivery;[
| Difficulty in selective agent addressability;[
|
| Electric | Electric field gradient | Simple drive equipment; low power consumption[
| Drug screening; disease treatment;[
| Slow response; limited to solution environments[
|
| Acoustic | Microbubbles[
| Good compatibility and gentleness with biological samples and environmental fluids;[
| Disease diagnosis;[
| Limited drive power; no suitable driving device has been obtained in vivo[
|
| Humidity | Exploitation of swelling due to humidity gradients[
| Propel itself without any artificial energy | Military and environmental robots; bio‐robot;[
| Close driving distance; less freedom |
| Light | Light‐induced formation[
| Long drive distance;[
| Environmentally responsive soft robotic systems;[
| Not applicable in opaque conditions |
| Microwave | Thermally drive | Selective heating; Integral uniform heating | Microwave exposure environment,[
| Damage to human health and electronic circuits |
Figure 1Microwave‐driven robots with two different motion forms. A) Schematic diagram of the microwave‐driven‐parallel robot with bending actuators powered and controlled by ambient microwaves. By rotating the horn antenna around the x‐axis to control the polarization direction of the ambient microwave, the received microwave power of each bending actuator can be adjusted. B) Schematic diagram of the quadruped robot and flower‐like robot with retractable actuators activated by ambient microwave. The on–off control of the robots can be achieved by rotating the horn around the z‐axis or adjusting the polarization direction of the microwaves.
Figure 2Wave‐absorbing sheets under the microwave. A) Schematic showing poses of the sheet in the microwave field with the serial numbers labeled on the top. B) Layout of the testing platform. C) The experimental results show the heating effect of the wave‐absorbing sheet with different poses in the microwave field. D) Temperature increases in the sheet with different L values (insets) at pose 1, where P = 700 W and D = 400 mm. E) Temperature versus the length L of a 2 mm width slender microwave‐absorbing material after heating 30 s in microwaves (P = 200 W and D = 400 mm). Error bars indicate the SD for n = 3, where n is the number of groups of experimental data. F) Temperature rise in the sheet with different L values (insets) at pose 2, where P = 700 W and D = 400 mm. G,H) The temperature rise in the sheet at pose 1 under different transmitting powers P and different distances D between the wave‐absorbing sheet (50 mm × 10 mm) and the wave port. Error bars in (C, D, and F to H) indicate the SD for n = 6.
Figure 3Parallel robot controlled by microwaves. A) Schematic showing a parallel robot composed of three sections: three driving arms, an acrylic frame, and a PET arm. The PET arm has six flexible joints (right). B) Kinematical diagram of the parallel robot (top) and the location of the robot relative to the horn antenna (bottom). C) Sequence of images showing the characteristics of the driving arm under microwave irradiation (left) and the relationship between temperature and force (right). D) Simulation results of the magnetic (top) and electric (bottom) field radiated from a horn antenna using COMSOL. E) Schematic diagram of controlling the parallel robot via tuning the direction of polarization.
Figure 4Path control for the microwave‐driven‐parallel robot. A) Photographic sequence of the parallel robot performed a circular path (left) under a unified change of the θ p with step sizes equaled to 15° and 10 s intervals (right); refer to Movie S1 in the Supporting Information. The robot was 450 mm away from the antenna and the power of magnetron was 700 W. B) Photographic sequence of optimized circular path motion of the parallel robot (left) and the graph of the transform of θ p during the motion (right). C) Photographic sequence of the robot performing a triangular path (left) under the variation of the θ p (right); refer to Movie S2 in the Supporting Information. D) Inverse solution (top) and the variations in λ p (bottom) when the parallel robot performed a circular path. The desired path is shown on the right side with a starting point (blue point) on the top. Here, α is the bending angle of the driving arm. E) Inverse solution (top) and the variation in λ p (bottom) when the parallel robot performed a triangular path. The desired path of the inverse solution is shown on the right side. F) Photo of the parallel robot in a closed acrylic box. The robot was 450 mm away from the antenna. G) Image sequence showing the motion of the parallel robot in the confined space with the circular path.
Figure 5Quadruped crawling robot based on a retractable actuator. A) Photo of insect‐scale quadruped crawling robot based on retractable actuator. The robot is 15 mm long and weighs only 0.42 g. B) Schematic showing the principle of quadruped robot. C) Photographic sequence of the quadruped robot crawling on an undulation surface powered by ambient microwaves with P = 700 W, D = 400 mm. D) Sequence of image showing the crawling process of the quadruped robot behind an obstacle (cardboard box characterized by 130 mm × 130 mm × 65 mm) with P = 700 W, D = 400 mm. E) Image showing the retractable actuator composed of a wire and an SMA spring in series. F) Contraction time of the SMA spring versus the wire length under microwaves with P = 700 W, D = 400 mm. G) Relationship between contraction time of the SMA spring and the transmitting power P of the microwave. H) Contraction time of the SMA spring as a function of distance D between retractable actuator and the wave port. Error bars in (F to H) represent the SD of the averaged values from six measurements. There is an interval of 30 s for air cooling between two adjacent groups of experiments.
Figure 6Flower‐like robot based on four retractable actuators. A) Structure of the flower‐like robot. B) Flowering and recovery process of the flower‐like robot.