| Literature DB >> 35986256 |
Zhenhua Luo1, Zien Chen1, Mengyun Liu1, Li Yang1, Zhimin Zhao2, Depo Yang2, Ping Ding3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Morinda officinalis How (MO) is a perennial herb distributed in tropical and subtropical regions, which known as one of the "Four Southern Herbal Medicines". The extent of genetic variability and the population structure of MO are presently little understood. Here, nine morphological traits, six chemical components and Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers were used in integrative research of MO germplasm variation among 88 individuals collected from ten populations across four geographical provinces of China.Entities:
Keywords: Chemical components; Genetic diversity; Morinda officinalis; Morphological traits; Single-nucleotide polymorphism
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35986256 PMCID: PMC9392303 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-022-08817-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 4.547
Fig. 1Geographical locations of Morinda officinalis in four provinces in China
Morphological traits of Morinda officinalis germplasm utilized in this study
| Variables | Max | Min | Mean | SD | CV(/%) | H′ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Root length (cm) | 104.60 | 8.30 | 37.93 | 17.66 | 46.56 | 1.8977 |
| Root diameter (cm) | 1.54 | 0.39 | 0.82 | 0.22 | 26.83 | 1.9442 |
| Leaf length (cm) | 15.51 | 3.24 | 7.04 | 2.15 | 30.54 | 1.8807 |
| Leaf width (cm) | 6.65 | 1.05 | 3.17 | 1.03 | 32.49 | 2.0430 |
| Root range (cm) | 57.50 | 7.10 | 25.99 | 9.87 | 37.98 | 1.9593 |
| Main root number (piece) | 11.80 | 1.30 | 3.30 | 1.64 | 49.70 | 1.7275 |
| Lateral root number (piece) | 13.00 | 0.80 | 3.30 | 1.93 | 58.48 | 1.9273 |
| Plant height (cm) | 223.00 | 7.00 | 36.07 | 24.54 | 68.03 | 1.4913 |
| Section color of the root | 2.00 | 0.00 | 1.55 | 0.59 | 38.06 | 0.7930 |
SD Standard deviation, which was calculated based on the measured values of nine traits. CV is an abbreviation of coefficient of variation, which was estimated as the ratio of the standard deviation to the mean of all accessions. H′, Shanon’s diversity index, which is used to investigate the endemic diversity of plant communities
Fig. 2The phenotypic characters of wild species of Morinda officinalis in different populations (a) Fangcheng; (b) Nanjing; (c) Danzhou
Variation of oligosaccharides contents of Morinda officinalis (mg·g− 1)
| Variables | Max | Min | Mean | SD | CV/% | H′ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| fructose | 65.29 | 0.00 | 14.11 | 13.33 | 94.47 | 1.8156 |
| glucose | 12.88 | 0.00 | 3.27 | 2.79 | 85.32 | 1.8601 |
| sucrose | 93.17 | 15.05 | 40.43 | 13.34 | 33.00 | 1.9836 |
| 1-kestose | 77.00 | 6.97 | 30.95 | 13.52 | 43.68 | 1.977 |
| nystose | 84.37 | 4.55 | 55.26 | 12.76 | 23.09 | 2.0427 |
| 1F-fructofuranosyl nystose nystose | 129.25 | 4,70 | 79.87 | 19.94 | 24.97 | 2.0485 |
Fig. 3Principal component analysis of variables
Fig. 4The number and distribution of SNPs. a The number of SNPs in 88 Morinda officinalis samples. b The mutation types of all SNPs. c The SNPs’ number among 100 longest scaffolds. d The distribution density of SNPs on scaffolds
Distribution of SNPs from different regions of Morinda officinalis transcriptome
| Regions | Substitution types | Number of SNPs | Proportion (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Genetic region | Synonymous | 36,842 | 16.12 |
| Non-synonymous | 49,509 | 21.66 | |
| Start codon variant | 182 | 0.08 | |
| Stop codon variant | 286 | 0.13 | |
| 5’UTR | 31,327 | 13.70 | |
| 3’UTR | 57,859 | 25.31 | |
| Intergenic region | Intergenic region | 53,078 | 23.22 |
Fig. 5GO enrichment of genes with non-synonymous SNPs in Morinda officinalis
Summary statistics of molecular diversity revealed by SNP markers in ten Morinda officinalis populations from four provinces in China
| Population | Sample size | Na | Ne | I | Ho | He | Nei | PPB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deqing | 23 | 1.8646 | 1.4526 | 0.3892 | 0.3610 | 0.2632 | 0.2574 | 86.46% |
| Shaoguan | 2 | 1.6562 | 1.5125 | 0.4079 | 0.4609 | 0.3776 | 0.2832 | 65.62% |
| Yunan | 10 | 1.7656 | 1.4892 | 0.4083 | 0.4318 | 0.2902 | 0.2757 | 76.56% |
| Gaoyao | 11 | 1.8906 | 1.5361 | 0.4699 | 0.3854 | 0.3290 | 0.3140 | 89.06% |
| Wuzhou | 11 | 1.4948 | 1.4569 | 0.3272 | 0.4389 | 0.2447 | 0.2335 | 49.48% |
| Fangcheng | 4 | 1.7708 | 1.4293 | 0.3983 | 0.2669 | 0.2993 | 0.2619 | 77.08% |
| Qinzhou | 3 | 1.3646 | 1.2477 | 0.2093 | 0.1649 | 0.1705 | 0.1421 | 36.46% |
| Nanjing | 20 | 1.974 | 1.6163 | 0.5282 | 0.4161 | 0.3651 | 0.3560 | 97.40% |
| Danzhou | 1 | 1.2500 | 1.2500 | 0.1733 | 0.2500 | 0.2500 | 0.1250 | 25.00% |
| Wuzhishan | 3 | 1.6562 | 1.4085 | 0.3623 | 0.2604 | 0.291 | 0.2425 | 65.62% |
| Mean | 8.8 | 1.6687 | 1.4399 | 0.3679 | 0.3436 | 0.2881 | 0.2491 | 66.87% |
Na Observed number of alleles, Ne Effective number of alleles, I Shannon’s information index, Ho Observed heterozygosity, He Expected heterozygosity, Nei Nei’s genetic distance, PPB Percentage of polymorphic bands
Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) in 88 Morinda officinalis based on SNP loci
| Source | Df | Sum of squares | Variance components | Percentage of variation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Among groups | 3 | 1.542 | −0.0012 | − 0.24 |
| Among populations within groups | 6 | 3.216 | 0.00290 | 0.58 |
| Among individuals within populations | 166 | 82.401 | 0.49639 | 99.66 |
| Total | 175 | 87.159 | 0.49809 | 100 |
Fig. 6Primary population structure and UPGMA clustering for 88 Morinda officinalis accessions
Fig. 7Principal component analysis (PCA) of 88 Morinda officinalis accessions