| Literature DB >> 35983485 |
Qiang Fu1,2, Hui Huang1, Aiwen Ding1, Ziqi Yu1, Yuping Huang3, Guiping Fu1, Yushan Huang4, Xiaoliu Huang1,2.
Abstract
Metabolic diseases characterized by dyslipidemia are common health problems for elderly populations. Dietary fiber intake is inversely associated with the risk of dyslipidemia. This study investigated the effects of Portulaca oleracea polysaccharide (POP) on the intestinal microbiota and its metabolites in aging rats using 16S rRNA sequencing and metabolomics techniques. Our results showed that POPs reduced the ratio of Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes (F/B), relative abundance of Fusobacteria, and levels of triglyceride (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and gamma-glutamyl transferase (γ-GT) in the serum of aging rats. POP supplementation also reduced 5beta-cholestane-3alpha,7alpha,12alpha,25-tetrol, and vaccenic acid concentrations in lipids and lipoid-like molecules, while soyasapogenol E and monoacylglycerol (MG) (24:0/0:0/0:0) levels increased. This study demonstrated that POP's beneficial effects on lipid levels in aging rats might be partially attributable to the modification of gut microbiota and related metabolites.Entities:
Keywords: Portulaca oleracea polysaccharides; aging rats; intestinal microbiota; metabolites; serum lipid level
Year: 2022 PMID: 35983485 PMCID: PMC9378863 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.965653
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
FIGURE 1Relative feed intake (A) and fasting plasma glucose level (B) measurements after supplementation with POP and purslane. The different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).
FIGURE 2Effects of POP administration on (A) body weight, (B) organ index, (C) enzyme activity of liver function, and (D) serum lipid levels. The symbols * and ** indicate statistically significant differences among the groups (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively).
FIGURE 3H&E staining of the colon. Regular morphology and clearer and more intact structures of the colons of rats were observed in the POP and herb groups than in the Con group.
Alpha-diversity indices of the fecal microbiota.
| Sample | Chao1 | Goods-coverage | Observed | Shannon | Simpson |
| Con | 3,972.63 ± 146.36a | 0.9836 ± 0.0006b | 2,973.89 ± 127.86c | 7.87 ± 0.32d | 0.976 ± 0.011e |
| POP | 4,104.48 ± 228.89a | 0.9831 ± 0.0010b | 3,060.96 ± 207.71c | 7.86 ± 0.25d | 0.977 ± 0.009e |
| Herb | 4,007.11 ± 150.93a | 0.9835 ± 0.0007b | 2,977.06 ± 139.28c | 7.69 ± 0.18d | 0.971 ± 0.005e |
Values are represented as the means ± SD. Different letters indicate significant differences.
FIGURE 4(A,B) Changes in the structure of fecal microbiota at the phylum level in the Con, POP, and herb groups. (C) PCA plots of all samples. * and ** indicate statistically significant differences (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively).
FIGURE 5(A) LEfSe multilevel species hierarchy tree. (B) Microbial populations with an LDA score >3.0.
FIGURE 6(A,B) OPLS-DA score lots of fecal metabolites in each group profiled through LC-MS. (C) Permutation tests for the OPLS-DA model in the POP and Con groups. (D) Permutation tests for the OPLS-DA model in the herb and Con groups.
The 33 kinds of lipid and lipid molecular metabolites that significantly influenced by purslane polysaccharides in aging rats.
| Common name | POP/ | Herb/ |
| Formula | Class | Adducts | Rt (min) | HMDB |
| 5beta-Cholestane-3alpha,7alpha,12alpha,25-tetrol | ↓ | ↓ | 459.3464 | C27H48O4 | Steroids and steroid derivatives | M + Na | 11.24 | HMDB0000524 |
| 5-Androstene-3b,16b,17a-triol | ↓ | ↓ | 351.2176 | C19H30O3 | Steroids and steroid derivatives | M + FA-H | 8.80 | HMDB0000523 |
| 5b-Cholestane-3a,7a,12a,23-Tetrol | ↓ | ↓ | 459.3465 | C27H48O4 | Steroids and steroid derivatives | M + Na | 11.74 | HMDB0001968 |
| Soyasaponin I | ↓ | ↓ | 943.5248 | C48H78O18 | Prenol lipids | M + H, M + Na | 9.03 | HMDB0034649 |
| Soyasapogenol E | ↑ | ↑ | 479.3483 | C30H48O3 | Prenol lipids | M + Na | 8.02 | HMDB0034652 |
| beta-Elemolic acid | ↑ | ↑ | 479.3480 | C30H48O3 | Prenol lipids | M + Na | 7.82 | HMDB0034961 |
| 3alpha-3-Hydroxytirucalla-7,24-dien-21-oic acid | ↑ | ↑ | 479.3482 | C30H48O3 | Prenol lipids | M + Na | 8.31 | HMDB0034962 |
| Medicagenic acid | ↓ | ↓ | 501.3224 | C30H46O6 | Prenol lipids | M-H, M + FA-H | 10.30 | HMDB0034551 |
| (3beta,17alpha,23S)-17,23-Epoxy-3,29-dihydroxy-27-norlanost-8-en-24-one | ↓ | ↓ | 459.3468 | C29H46O4 | Prenol lipids | M + H | 11.02 | HMDB0035142 |
| Oxysolavetivone | ↓ | ↓ | 279.1601 | C15H22O2 | Prenol lipids | M + FA-H | 7.29 | HMDB0034956 |
| (1alpha,4beta,5beta)-4-Hydroxy-7(11),10(14)-guaiadien-8-one | ↓ | ↓ | 235.1690 | C15H22O2 | Prenol lipids | M + H-H2O, M + H | 8.65 | HMDB0036449 |
| Tuberonone | ↓ | ↓ | 219.1741 | C15H24O2 | Prenol lipids | M + H-H2O | 10.53 | HMDB0039688 |
| 3,14-Dihydroxy-11,13-dihydrocostunolide | ↓ | ↓ | 267.1589 | C15H22O4 | Prenol lipids | M + H-H2O, M + H | 7.93 | HMDB0035647 |
| 20,24-Epoxy-25,26-dihydroxydammaran-3-one | ↓ | ↓ | 457.3673 | C30H50O4 | Prenol lipids | M + H-H2O, M + H | 11.08 | HMDB0039692 |
| alpha,gamma-Onoceradienedione | ↓ | ↓ | 439.3567 | C30H46O2 | Prenol lipids | M + H-H2O, M + H | 12.66 | HMDB0036787 |
| 22alpha-Hydroxyerythrodiol | ↑ | ↑ | 481.3635 | C30H50O3 | Prenol lipids | M + Na | 7.96 | HMDB0034549 |
| Camelledionol | ↓ | ↓ | 423.3243 | C29H44O3 | Prenol lipids | M + H-H2O | 10.58 | HMDB0035730 |
| Soyasaponin II | ↓ | ↓ | 913.5143 | C47H76O17 | Prenol lipids | M + H, M + Na | 9.33 | HMDB0034650 |
| (4S,8R)-8,9-Dihydroxy-p-menth-1(6)-en-2-one | ↑ | ↑ | 229.1076 | C10H16O3 | Prenol lipids | M + FA-H | 5.70 | HMDB0039052 |
| Absindiol | ↓ | ↓ | 267.1588 | C15H22O4 | Prenol lipids | M + H-H2O, M + H | 9.47 | HMDB0033229 |
| Camelliagenin A | ↑ | ↑ | 497.3584 | C30H50O4 | Prenol lipids | M + Na | 7.32 | HMDB0034528 |
| alpha-Rotunol | ↓ | ↓ | 279.1600 | C15H22O2 | Prenol lipids | M + FA-H | 8.69 | HMDB0035869 |
| 4a-Methylzymosterol-4-carboxylic acid | ↓ | ↓ | 443.3517 | C29H46O3 | Prenol lipids | M + H-H2O, M + H | 11.43 | HMDB0006927 |
| (1beta,2beta,5beta)-p-Menth-3-ene-1,2,5-triol | ↑ | ↑ | 231.1233 | C10H18O3 | Prenol lipids | M + FA-H | 6.07 | HMDB0038978 |
| 1-(8Z,11Z,14Z-Eicosatrienoyl)-glycero-3-phosphate | ↓ | ↓ | 478.2926 | C23H41O7P | Glycerophospholipids | M + NH4 | 11.30 | HMDB0062313 |
| MG (24:0/0:0/0:0) | ↑ | ↑ | 481.3634 | C27H54O4 | Glycerolipids | M + K | 8.08 | HMDB0011588 |
| MG (0:0/18:2(9Z,12Z)/0:0) | ↓ | ↓ | 355.2838 | C21H38O4 | Fatty acyls | M + H | 12.74 | HMDB0011538 |
| 20-HDoHE | ↓ | ↓ | 327.2313 | C22H32O3 | Fatty acyls | M + H-H2O | 7.46 | HMDB0060048 |
| Vaccenic acid | ↓ | ↓ | 300.2893 | C18H34O2 | Fatty acyls | M + H-H2O, M + NH4 | 12.57 | HMDB0003231 |
| Undecylenic acid | ↓ | ↓ | 185.1535 | C11H20O2 | Fatty acyls | M + H-H2O, M + H | 8.08 | HMDB0033724 |
| Muricin A | ↑ | ↑ | 641.4635 | C35H64O7 | Fatty acyls | M + FA-H | 10.80 | HMDB0036977 |
| (Z)-6-Tetradecene-1,3-diyne-5,8-diol | ↓ | ↓ | 265.1444 | C14H20O2 | Fatty acyls | M + FA-H | 7.93 | HMDB0038996 |
| Undecanedioic acid | ↑ | ↑ | 261.1341 | C11H20O4 | Fatty acyls | M + FA-H | 5.39 | HMDB0000888 |
Score >50, VIP >1.0, **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05.
The symbols ↑ and ↓ mean the metabolite is up and downregulated in POP and herb groups compared with the Con group. Significant difference compared with the Con group.
FIGURE 7Changes in the corresponding pathways associated with fecal metabolites. (A) Major changes between the POP and Con groups (P < 0.05). (B) Major changes between the herb and Con groups (P < 0.05).
FIGURE 8Correlation between serum lipids, fecal metabolites, and gut microbiota in Spearman’s correlation coefficient. * and ** indicate statistically significant differences (P < 0.05 and P<0.01, respectively).