| Literature DB >> 35982434 |
Jiangyun Chen1, Yusupujiang Tuersun1, Jiao Yang1, Man Xiong1, Yueying Wang1, Xinyi Rao1, Shuai Jiang2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of depression symptoms among medical students is particularly high, and it has increased during the COVID-19 epidemic. Sleep quality and state-trait anxiety are risk factors for depression, but no study has yet investigated the mediating role of state-trait anxiety in the relationship between poor sleep quality and depression symptoms in medical students. This study aims to investigate the relationship among depression symptoms, sleep quality and state-trait anxiety in medical university students in Anhui Province.Entities:
Keywords: Anxiety; China; Depression symptoms; Medical; Sleep quality; Students
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35982434 PMCID: PMC9388213 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03683-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Educ ISSN: 1472-6920 Impact factor: 3.263
Characteristics of respondents (N = 1227)
| Overall ( | Male ( | Female ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade | N (%) | 0.133 | ||
| 1 | 288 (23.47) | 121 (20.37) | 167 (26.38) | |
| 2 | 75 (6.11) | 39 (6.57) | 36 (5.69) | |
| 3 | 91 (7.42) | 43 (7.24) | 48 (7.58) | |
| 4 | 676 (55.09) | 345 (58.08) | 331 (52.29) | |
| 5 | 97 (7.91) | 46 (7.74) | 51 (8.06) | |
| Major | 0.263 | |||
| Medicine | 1087 (88.59) | 520 (87.54) | 567 (89.57) | |
| Other | 140 (11.41) | 74 (12.46) | 66 (10.43) | |
| Ethnicity | 0.873 | |||
| Han | 1193 (97.23) | 578 (97.31) | 615 (97.16) | |
| Minority | 24 (1.96) | 16 (2.69) | 18 (2.84) | |
| Only child | <0.001 | |||
| No | 740 (60.31) | 314 (52.86) | 426 (67.30) | |
| Yes | 487 (36.69) | 280 (47.14) | 207 (32.70) | |
| Birthplace | 0.225 | |||
| Urban | 432 (35.21) | 199 (33.50) | 233 (36.81) | |
| Rural | 795 (64.79) | 395 (66.50) | 400 (63.19) | |
| Closet relationship | 0.192 | |||
| Parents | 1006 (81.99) | 492 (82.83) | 514 (81.20) | |
| Grandparents | 145 (11.82) | 60 (10.10) | 85 (13.43) | |
| Siblings | 51 (4.16) | 27 (4.55) | 24 (3.79) | |
| Other | 25 (2.04) | 15 (2.53) | 10 (1.58) | |
| Education of closest relationship | 0.001 | |||
| Less than lower secondary education | 640 (52.16) | 301 (50.67) | 339 (52.97) | |
| Upper secondary & vocational | 251 (20.46) | 148 (24.92) | 103 (16.27) | |
| Tertiary education | 336 (27.38) | 145 (24.41) | 191 (30.17) | |
| Education of father | 0.011 | |||
| Less than lower secondary education | 662 (53.95) | 313 (52.69) | 349 (55.13) | |
| Upper secondary & vocational | 290 (23.63) | 157 (26.43) | 133 (21.10) | |
| Tertiary education | 275 (22.41) | 124 (20.88) | 151 (23.85) | |
| Education of mother | 0.010 | |||
| Less than lower secondary education | 820 (66.83) | 386 (64.98) | 434 (68.56) | |
| Upper secondary & vocational | 235 (19.15) | 136 (22.90) | 99 (15.64) | |
| Tertiary education | 172 (14.02) | 72 (12.12) | 100 (15.80) | |
| Job of closest relationship | 0.003 | |||
| Workers | 396 (32.27) | 226 (38.05) | 170 (26.86) | |
| Farmers | 206 (16.79) | 94 (15.82) | 112 (17.69) | |
| Civil servants, teachers and other intellectuals | 264 (21.52) | 110 (18.52) | 154 (24.33) | |
| Businessmen | 172 (14.02) | 82 (13.80) | 90 (14.22) | |
| Others | 199 (16.22) | 82 (13.80) | 107 (16.90) | |
| Job of father | 0.411 | |||
| Workers | 534 (43.52) | 275 (46.30) | 259 (40.92) | |
| Farmers | 131 (10.68) | 64 (10.77) | 67 (10.58) | |
| Civil servants, teachers and other intellectuals | 237 (19.32) | 108 (18.18) | 129 (20.38) | |
| Businessmen | 197 (16.06) | 94 (15.82) | 103 (16.27) | |
| Others | 128 (10.43) | 53 (8.92) | 75 (11.85) | |
| Job of mother | 0.008 | |||
| Workers | 431 (35.13) | 239 (40.24) | 192 (30.33) | |
| Farmers | 243 (19.80) | 112 (18.86) | 131 (20.70) | |
| Civil servants, teachers and other intellectuals | 185 (15.08) | 86 (14.48) | 99 (15.64) | |
| Businessmen | 154 (12.55) | 72 (12.12) | 82 (12.95) | |
| Others | 214 (17.44) | 85 (14.31) | 129 (20.38) | |
| PSQI (Mean ± SD) | 5.87 ± 2.94 | 5.75 ± 3.04 | 5.97 ± 2.86 | 0.010 |
| STAI (Mean ± SD) | 84.10 ± 17.28 | 84.23 ± 17.76 | 83.98 ± 16.82 | 0.278 |
| SDS (Mean ± SD) | 49.04 ± 10.85 | 48.87 ± 11.09 | 49.19 ± 10.62 | 0.228 |
Partial correlations coefficients (r) among PSQI, STAI and SDS
| PSQI | STAI | SDS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PSQI | |||
| STAI | 0.428*** | ||
| SDS | 0.381*** | 0.775*** | |
PSQI Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, STAI State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, SDS Self-rating Depression Scale
The model was adjusted for gender, birthplace, grade, major, ethnicity, only child, close relationship, education of close relationship, education of father, education of mother, job of close relationship, job of father, job of mother
Values are bolded if they achieved statistical significance at p ≤ 0.05
*** p < 0.001
Linear regression analysis for PSQI associated with STAI and SDS in students, [β (95% CI)]
| STAI | SDS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β(95% CI) | β(95% CI) | ||||
| PSQI | Unadjusted | 2.51 (2.22,2.81) | <0.001 | 1.40 (1.21,1.59) | <0.001 |
| Adjusted 1 | 1.51 (1.16,1.17) | <0.001 | 0.88 (0.65,1.11) | <0.001 | |
| Adjusted 2 | 1.48 (1.12,1.83) | <0.001 | 0.89 (0.66,1.12) | <0.001 | |
β beta coefficient, CI confidence interval, PSQI Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, STAI State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, SDS Self-rating Depression Scale
Adjusted 1: Adjusted for gender, age
Adjusted 2: Adjusted for gender, age, major, ethnicity, only child, birthplace, closest relationship, education of closest relationship, education of mother, education of father, job of closest relationship, job of mother, job of father
Linear aegression analysis for STAI associated with SDS in students, [β (95% CI)]
| SDS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| β(95% CI) | |||
| STAI | Unadjusted | 0.49 (0.46,0.51) | <0.001 |
| Adjusted 1 | 0.48 (0.44,0.49) | <0.001 | |
| Adjusted 2 | 0.48 (0.45,0.50) | <0.001 | |
β beta coefficient, CI confidence interval, SDS Self-rating Depression Scale, STAI State-Trait Anxiety Inventory
Adjusted 1: Adjusted for gender, age
Adjusted 2: Adjusted for gender, age, major, ethnicity, only child, birthplace, closest relationship, education of closest relationship, education of mother, education of father, job of closest relationship, job of mother, job of father
Fig. 1Mediation Analysis. Note: STAI = State-Trait Anxiety Inventory; PSQI = Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; SDS = Self-rating Depression Scale. The Sobel test was used to test the hypothesis that the indirect role was equal to 0, adjusting for potential confounders (gender, birthplace, grade, major, ethnicity, only child, close relationship, education of close relationship, education of father, education of mother, job of close relationship, job of father, job of mother). Values are bolded if they reached statistical significance at p ≤ 0.05
Subgroup analysis of mediation models for SDS associated with PSQI mediated by STAI in medical university students
| Indirect effect | Direct effect | Total effect | Z | Sobel | Proportion of total effect that is mediated | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||||||
| Male | 1.217*** | 0.149 | 1.366*** | 10.884 | <0.001 | 89.12 |
| Female | 1.117*** | 0.315** | 1.432*** | 10.313 | <0.001 | 78.01 |
| Birthplace | ||||||
| Urban | 1.104*** | 0.189 | 1.294*** | 8.411 | <0.001 | 85.37 |
| Rural | 1.213*** | 0.247** | 1.461*** | 12.521 | <0.001 | 83.07 |
STAI State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, PSQI Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, SDS Self-rating depression scale. Sobel-Goodman Mediation Test in adjusted models for gender, birthplace, grade, major, ethnicity, only child, close relationship, education of close relationship, education of father, education of mother, job of close relationship, job of father, job of mother. Values are bolded if they achieved statistical significance at P ≤ 0.05
** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001