Literature DB >> 35982364

Towards Automated Brain Aneurysm Detection in TOF-MRA: Open Data, Weak Labels, and Anatomical Knowledge.

Tommaso Di Noto1, Guillaume Marie2, Sebastien Tourbier2, Yasser Alemán-Gómez2,3, Oscar Esteban2, Guillaume Saliou2, Meritxell Bach Cuadra4, Patric Hagmann2, Jonas Richiardi2.   

Abstract

Brain aneurysm detection in Time-Of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography (TOF-MRA) has undergone drastic improvements with the advent of Deep Learning (DL). However, performances of supervised DL models heavily rely on the quantity of labeled samples, which are extremely costly to obtain. Here, we present a DL model for aneurysm detection that overcomes the issue with "weak" labels: oversized annotations which are considerably faster to create. Our weak labels resulted to be four times faster to generate than their voxel-wise counterparts. In addition, our model leverages prior anatomical knowledge by focusing only on plausible locations for aneurysm occurrence. We first train and evaluate our model through cross-validation on an in-house TOF-MRA dataset comprising 284 subjects (170 females / 127 healthy controls / 157 patients with 198 aneurysms). On this dataset, our best model achieved a sensitivity of 83%, with False Positive (FP) rate of 0.8 per patient. To assess model generalizability, we then participated in a challenge for aneurysm detection with TOF-MRA data (93 patients, 20 controls, 125 aneurysms). On the public challenge, sensitivity was 68% (FP rate = 2.5), ranking 4th/18 on the open leaderboard. We found no significant difference in sensitivity between aneurysm risk-of-rupture groups (p = 0.75), locations (p = 0.72), or sizes (p = 0.15). Data, code and model weights are released under permissive licenses. We demonstrate that weak labels and anatomical knowledge can alleviate the necessity for prohibitively expensive voxel-wise annotations.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aneurysm detection; Deep learning; Domain knowledge; Magnetic resonance angiography; Model robustness; Weak annotation

Year:  2022        PMID: 35982364     DOI: 10.1007/s12021-022-09597-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroinformatics        ISSN: 1539-2791


  24 in total

1.  Observer studies involving detection and localization: modeling, analysis, and validation.

Authors:  Dev P Chakraborty; Kevin S Berbaum
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Deep learning based detection of intracranial aneurysms on digital subtraction angiography: A feasibility study.

Authors:  Nicolin Hainc; Manoj Mannil; Vaia Anagnostakou; Hatem Alkadhi; Christian Blüthgen; Lorenz Wacht; Andrea Bink; Shakir Husain; Zsolt Kulcsár; Sebastian Winklhofer
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2020-07-07

Review 3.  Saccular intracranial aneurysm: pathology and mechanisms.

Authors:  Juhana Frösen; Riikka Tulamo; Anders Paetau; Elisa Laaksamo; Miikka Korja; Aki Laakso; Mika Niemelä; Juha Hernesniemi
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 17.088

4.  Deep learning for automated cerebral aneurysm detection on computed tomography images.

Authors:  Xilei Dai; Lixiang Huang; Yi Qian; Shuang Xia; Winston Chong; Junjie Liu; Antonio Di Ieva; Xiaoxi Hou; Chubin Ou
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  A deep learning algorithm may automate intracranial aneurysm detection on MR angiography with high diagnostic performance.

Authors:  Bio Joo; Sung Soo Ahn; Pyeong Ho Yoon; Sohi Bae; Beomseok Sohn; Yong Eun Lee; Jun Ho Bae; Moo Sung Park; Hyun Seok Choi; Seung-Koo Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-05-30       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Automated computerized scheme for detection of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  Hidetaka Arimura; Qiang Li; Yukunori Korogi; Toshinori Hirai; Hiroyuki Abe; Yasuyuki Yamashita; Shigehiko Katsuragawa; Ryuji Ikeda; Kunio Doi
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 7.  Development of the PHASES score for prediction of risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of six prospective cohort studies.

Authors:  Jacoba P Greving; Marieke J H Wermer; Robert D Brown; Akio Morita; Seppo Juvela; Masahiro Yonekura; Toshihiro Ishibashi; James C Torner; Takeo Nakayama; Gabriël J E Rinkel; Ale Algra
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 44.182

Review 8.  Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: epidemiology, natural history, management options, and familial screening.

Authors:  Robert D Brown; Joseph P Broderick
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 44.182

9.  nnU-Net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation.

Authors:  Fabian Isensee; Paul F Jaeger; Simon A A Kohl; Jens Petersen; Klaus H Maier-Hein
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 28.547

10.  Correlation of Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio with Expression of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Within Stroke Emboli.

Authors:  Jorge Arturo Larco; Mehdi Abbasi; Sarosh Irfan Madhani; Madalina Oana Mereuta; Yang Liu; Daying Dai; Ramanathan Kadirvel; Luis Savastano; David F Kallmes; Waleed Brinjikji
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 1.610

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.