Xianzhi Zhao1, Yu-Tian Xiao2, Yue Yang2, Yusheng Ye1, Yifan Chang2, Lingong Jiang1, Md Eftekhar3, Shancheng Ren4, Huojun Zhang1. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, 12520Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China. 2. Department of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, 12520Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China. 3. Department of Family Medicine, CanAm International Medical Center, Shenzhen, China. 4. Department of Urology, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, 56652Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment for oligometastatic prostate cancer (OMPC) is still on its way. Accumulating evidence has proven the safety and feasibility of radical prostatectomy and local or metastasis-directed radiotherapy for oligometastatic patients. The aim of this trial is to demonstrate the safety and feasibility outcomes of metastasis-directed neoadjuvant radiotherapy (naRT) and neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (naADT) followed by robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for treating OMPC. METHODS: The present study will be conducted as a prospective, open-label, dose-escalation, phase I/II clinical trial. The patients with oligometastatic PCa will receive 1 month of naADT, followed by metastasis-directed radiation and abdominal or pelvic radiotherapy. Then, radical prostatectomy will be performed at intervals of 4-8 weeks after radiotherapy, and ADT will be continued for 2 years. The primary endpoints of the study are safety profiles, assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) 5.0 grading scale, and perioperativemorbidities, assessed by the Clavien-Dindo classification system. The secondary endpoints include positive surgical margin (pSM), biochemical recurrence-free survival (bPFS), radiological progression-free survival (RPFS), postoperative continence, and quality of life (QoL) parameters. DISCUSSION: The optimal treatment for OMPC is still on its way, prompting investigation for novel multimodality treatment protocol for this patient population. Traditionally, radical prostatectomy has been recommended as one of the standard therapies for localized prostate cancer, but indications have expanded over the years as recommended by NCCN and EAU guidelines. RP has been carried out in some centres for OMPC patients, but its value has been inconclusive, showing elevated complication risks and limited survival benefit. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy has been proven safe and effective in colorectal cancer, breast cancer and other various types of malignant tumors, showing potential advantages in terms of reducing metastatic stem-cell activity, providing clinical downstaging, and reducing potential intraoperative risks. Existing trials have shown that naRT is well tolerated for high-risk and locally-advanced prostate cancer. In this study, we hope to further determine the optimal irradiation dose and patient tolerance for genitourinary, gastrointestinal and systemic toxicities with the design of 3+3 dose escalation; also, final pathology can be obtained following RP to further determine treatment response and follow-up treatment plans. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1900025743. http://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojen.aspx?proj=43065.
BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment for oligometastatic prostate cancer (OMPC) is still on its way. Accumulating evidence has proven the safety and feasibility of radical prostatectomy and local or metastasis-directed radiotherapy for oligometastatic patients. The aim of this trial is to demonstrate the safety and feasibility outcomes of metastasis-directed neoadjuvant radiotherapy (naRT) and neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (naADT) followed by robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for treating OMPC. METHODS: The present study will be conducted as a prospective, open-label, dose-escalation, phase I/II clinical trial. The patients with oligometastatic PCa will receive 1 month of naADT, followed by metastasis-directed radiation and abdominal or pelvic radiotherapy. Then, radical prostatectomy will be performed at intervals of 4-8 weeks after radiotherapy, and ADT will be continued for 2 years. The primary endpoints of the study are safety profiles, assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) 5.0 grading scale, and perioperativemorbidities, assessed by the Clavien-Dindo classification system. The secondary endpoints include positive surgical margin (pSM), biochemical recurrence-free survival (bPFS), radiological progression-free survival (RPFS), postoperative continence, and quality of life (QoL) parameters. DISCUSSION: The optimal treatment for OMPC is still on its way, prompting investigation for novel multimodality treatment protocol for this patient population. Traditionally, radical prostatectomy has been recommended as one of the standard therapies for localized prostate cancer, but indications have expanded over the years as recommended by NCCN and EAU guidelines. RP has been carried out in some centres for OMPC patients, but its value has been inconclusive, showing elevated complication risks and limited survival benefit. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy has been proven safe and effective in colorectal cancer, breast cancer and other various types of malignant tumors, showing potential advantages in terms of reducing metastatic stem-cell activity, providing clinical downstaging, and reducing potential intraoperative risks. Existing trials have shown that naRT is well tolerated for high-risk and locally-advanced prostate cancer. In this study, we hope to further determine the optimal irradiation dose and patient tolerance for genitourinary, gastrointestinal and systemic toxicities with the design of 3+3 dose escalation; also, final pathology can be obtained following RP to further determine treatment response and follow-up treatment plans. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1900025743. http://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojen.aspx?proj=43065.
Entities:
Keywords:
neoadjuvant radiation therapy; oligometastatic; prostate cancer
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignancy in men, with an incidence rate of
29.3%. It is also one of the leading cause of death among cancer entities, with a
mortality rate of 7.6% globally.
Traditionally, radical prostatectomy has been recommended as the standard
therapy for localized PCa. However, if patients present with evidence of metastasis,
systemic therapies such as androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) or chemotherapy are
strongly recommended.[2,3]
The current paradigm for the treatment of advanced PCa is shifting towards a more
comprehensive approach. The last 2 decades have witnessed great progress in surgical
and radiation techniques, such as robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical
prostatectomy (RALP), intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and stereotactic
body radiotherapy (SBRT). Emerging evidence indicates that various comprehensive
approaches might provide survival benefits to patients with lymph node-positive and
metastatic PCa.[4-8]Oligometastatic PCa has been proposed as an intermediate stage of cancer spread
between localized disease and widespread metastases. Ongoing clinical trials
including ongoing multi-institutional randomized Phase II trial (NCT01751438)
conducted by MD Anderson Cancer Center and SWOG/NCTN Phase III trial (NCT03678025),
have been conducted to compare the additional value of local treatment on the basis
of initial best systemic therapy for de novo metastatic prostate cancer. In this
setting, the multimodality treatment paradigm of oligometastatic PCa requires local
consolidated therapy for the primary tumour by surgery or radiotherapy,
metastasis-directed therapy, and systemic ADT or chemotherapy. With the development
of the daVinci Robotic System, RALP has become more clinically significant for
tumour control.[9,10] As an increasingly safe and effective treatment,
metastasis-directed radiation therapy remains promising for oligometastatic PCa.For patients with locally advanced PCa, a multimodality approach including radical
prostatectomy with lymph node dissection with/without adjuvant long-term ADT plus
radiotherapy is one of the recently developed treatments to reduce recurrence
risk.[2,3] In addition,
adverse pathological features from radical surgery can identify patients who are
likely to benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy. Phase III randomized controlled trials
have demonstrated that locally advanced PCa patients can benefit from adjuvant
radiotherapy in terms of tumour control and biochemical progression.
Randomized clinical trials of other malignancies, such as rectal cancer, have
demonstrated the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant radiotherapy with tolerable
toxicities.[3,14-16] What’s more, neoadjuvant SBRT may lead to severe toxicity as
reported by some studies on nonmetastatic high-risk or locally advanced prostate
cancer.[12,13] But neoadjuvant conventional fractionation radiotherapy is
still underexplored.Hereby, we present a phase I study to demonstrate early evidence of the safety and
efficacy of the intervention.
Methods and Analysis
Ethics and Dissemination
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Changhai Hospital
(CHEC2019-110) and is registered on ChiCTR (CHiCTR1900025743). All clinical data
will be collected by the researcher. Findings of the study will be submitted for
publication in peer-reviewed scientific journals and presented at relevant
medical conferences. Written informed consent was obtained according to the
International Council for Harmonization/Good Clinical Practice (ICH/GCP)
regulations before registration and prior to any trial-specific procedures.
Study Design
This study will be conducted as a phase I, prospective, open-label,
dose-escalation, single-arm study. The development of the study protocol
followed the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials
(SPIRIT) guidelines. The protocol is reported according to the SPIRIT
(Additional file 1). Written informed consent including treatment programs,
benefits, the possible risks and treatment measures for the risk and all
possible elements essential before conducting this clinical trial will be
obtained from eligible patients after initial evaluation with 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT.
Consecutive radiological images with 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT or whole-body MRI will be
scheduled before registration, radiotherapy, and surgery, as well as 1 year
after surgery. The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and testosterone levels of
the participants will be checked monthly. After the completion of treatment
during the study, participants will be given a follow-up every 3 months or as
needed clinically in the first 2 years, every 6 months in the next 3 years, and
annually thereafter. Follow-up examinations will include clinical assessments
and contrast-enhanced MRI, CT, ECT or 68-Ga PSMA PET/CT. For tumour progression,
treatment alternatives can be evaluated inter-disciplinarily considering
abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide, reradiation therapy, chemotherapy or
others.
Recruitment
Patients who are referred to the outpatient department of the trial site and who meet
the inclusion criteria will be recommended to participate in this trial by the
physicians in charge of the study.
Study Participants
Inclusion Criteria
◆ Aged 18 years or over at the time of registration◆ Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate without
small cell features◆ Oligometastatic PCa assessed by Ga-68 prostate-specific
membrane antigen (PSMA), PET/CT◆ <5 oligometastases (including bone, lymph nodes above the
renal artery level) and/or lymph node metastasis below the renal
artery level, tumour clinical stage cTx, Nx according to AJCC
TNM 2017◆ Expected survival time >5 years◆ World Health Organization (WHO) performance status 0-1◆ Be willing to give written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
◆ Any previous or ongoing treatment for PCa, including
radiotherapy, ADT, chemotherapy, focal treatment, etc.◆ Patients who have previously undergone transurethral resection
or enucleation of the prostate.◆ Patients who have undergone other abdominal surgery within the
last 3 months◆ Patients who have undergone transrectal prostatic biopsy within
the last 2 weeks◆ Patients with a history of long-term anticoagulant use and
anti-platelet drug use and who stopped anticoagulant therapy
less than 1 week before registration◆ Patients with other malignancies and acute or chronic
infections such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (+),
hepatitis C virus (HCV) (+) and/or positive syphilis◆ Severe or active comorbidities likely to impact the
advisability of radiotherapy◆ Any other serious underlying medical, psychiatric,
psychological, familial, or geographical condition, which,
according to the judgement of the investigator, may affect the
planned staging, treatment and follow-up or patient compliance
or may cause high-risk treatment-related complications for the
patient◆ Patients who have participated in other clinical trials within
the last 3 months◆ Patients who refuse to undergo RALP◆ Patients unsuitable for participation in this clinical trial as
per the judgement of the investigator.
Interventions
All subjects will receive 1 month of naADT followed by naRT for 4-7 weeks. Then,
RALP will be performed at intervals of 5-14 weeks after radiation, and adjuvant
ADT will be performed for 2 years.
Androgen Deprivation Therapy
Pre- and post-operative ADT will comprise an antiandrogen (bicalutamide
50 mg/d, oral) plus LHRH agonist (goserelin3.6 mg, monthly or 10.8 mg,
trimonthly, subcutaneous injection) 14 days after the initiation of
bicalutamide.
Radiation Therapy
For oligometastases, the method and timing of radiotherapy will vary
depending on the metastasis location.For pelvic oligometastatic lesions, IMRT will be administered simultaneously
with prostate radiotherapy. The gross tumour volume (GTV1) of
oligometastases is based on imaging examination: 68-Ga PSMA PET/CT. The
planning target volumes (PTVs) for GTV1 are delineated with an additional
5 mm margin. Dose segmentation will vary depending on the surrounding organs
at risk (OARs) and tumour size. First, 65 Gy with 25 fractions or 50 Gy with
25 fractions will be the recommended dose segmentation.For non-pelvic oligometastatic lesions, SBRT will be administered. The gross
tumour volume (GTV1) of oligometastases relies on imaging examination.
PTV-GTV1: GTV1 relies on 5-8 mm uniform expansion. 6-8 Gy per fraction with
5 fractions is the recommended dose segmentation, which will depend on the
surrounding OARs and tumour size. The dose guidelines for OARs in SBRT are
based upon AAPM Task Group 101.After IMRT is administered, all patients will undergo a contrasted CT
simulation of the pelvis or abdomen with a slice thickness of 5 mm. Then,
the CT image data will be transferred to the treatment planning system for
contouring the target volume and OARs. The critical normal structures
encompass the small bowel, bladder, femoral head, rectum, spinal cord,
prostatic urethra (if visualized), bulb of the urethra, kidney, etc. OARs
should be contoured according to the pelvic normal tissue contouring
guidelines of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG).
This protocol offers dose guidelines for OARs based on previously
published RTOG trials.The gross tumour volume (GTV2) will be contoured based on MRI. GTV2 consists
of the prostate and seminal vesicle glands. GTVnd consisting of
pelvic/retroperitoneal metastatic lymph nodes will be further confirmed by
medical imaging: MRI, 68-Ga PSMA PET/CT, etc. The clinical tumour volume
(CTV) compromises a 5 mm margin to the GTV2, GTVnd, and
pelvic/retroperitoneal lymphatic drainage area.The upper border of the whole pelvic field extends to the L5-S1 interspace in
the N1 subgroup. The pelvic lymphatic drainage area includes the bilateral
iliac lymph nodes, external iliac lymph nodes, internal iliac lymph nodes,
presacral lymph nodes of the S1-S3 levels and obturator lymph nodes. The
superior border of the retroperitoneal area is 2-3 cm above the positive
lymph nodes but does not cross the renal artery level. PTV-GTV2: GTV2 is
based on a 5-10 mm uniform expansion but on only 5 mm for the posterior part
to reduce any rectal irradiation. PTV-GTVnd for GTVnd should be delineated
with an additional 5 mm margin, and PTV-CTV for CTV should also be
delineated with an additional 5 mm margin separately.Four radiation dose levels are planned for dose escalation: 39.6 Gy, 45 Gy,
50.4 Gy, and 54 Gy in 22 fractions, 25 fractions, 28 fractions, and 30
fractions, respectively. Radiation therapy will be delivered in 5 fractions
per week. The initial 2 dose levels will target the whole
pelvis/retroperitoneum, whereas the latter 2 dose levels will act as a
subsequent boost for the prostate, seminal vesicles and
pelvic/retroperitoneal metastatic lymph nodes, which will be added after
reaching 45 Gy.
Dose Escalation
Dose escalation will be conducted with a 3 + 3 design with dose levels of
39.6, 45, 50.4, and 54 Gy in 22, 25, 28 and 30 fractions, respectively. A
traditional 3 + 3 dose-escalation design will be adopted (Figures 1 and 2). Briefly, 3
participants will be initially allocated to the starting dose cohort. If no
Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) is observed in any of the 3 participants, the
dose can be escalated, and the 3 new patients can be enrolled to receive the
next level of radiation dose. Even if one participant develops DLT, then an
additional 3 participants will be allocated to the same dose cohort. If
there are multiple observations of DLT at any given dose level, dose
escalation will be stopped, and the previous dose level will be identified
as the maximal tolerable dose (MTD). In this trial, DLTs are defined as any
grade III/IV toxicities.
Treatment schedule in the protocol.Abbreviations: M: Month; W: Week; D: Day; Y: Year.Graphical depiction of traditional 3 + 3 dose-escalation methods
for clinical trials.Abbreviations: DLT, Dose-limiting toxicity; MTD, Maximum
tolerable dose; Pt, patient; Pts, Patients.
Radical Prostatectomy
Surgery can be scheduled 5-14 weeks after the completion of radiation
therapy, via a robot-assisted transperitoneal approach on da Vinci Si
system, and extended pelvic/retroperitoneal lymph node dissection will be
performed, including obturator, internal iliac, external iliac, common
iliac, presacral, as well as radiologically-identified retroperitoneal
positive nodes up to the level of the renal arteries.
Study Endpoints
The primary endpoints of the study are treatment-induced acute and late
toxicities, as assessed by the CTCAE 5.0 grading scale, along with
intraoperative and postoperative 30-day morbidity assessed by Clavien-Dindo
classification system. Radiotherapy-related complications encompass acute and
late genitourinary (GU) toxicity, gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity and erectile
dysfunction (ED), while intraoperative and postoperative 30-day morbidity
consists of the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, rate of conversion to
open surgery, fibrosis in the radiotherapy area, etc. Late RT-induced toxicity
will be followed from 3 months after RT to up to 2 years postoperatively;
surgery-related comorbidities (e.g., incontinence) will be followed up to
2 years postoperatively; ADT-related adverse events, will be followed up to
2 years postoperatively. The secondary endpoints comprise the positive
postoperative incisal edge rate, biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS),
postoperative continence and recovery of sexual function, overall survival (OS)
and adverse reactions of ADT, as well as quality of life (QoL) evaluation, which
will be documented using Italian UCLA Prostate Cancer Index and SF-12 scale.
Determination of Sample Size
The study is a dose-escalation study with 4 dose levels. Three to 6 patients will
be allocated to each dose level cohort. Therefore, the minimal and maximum
sample sizes for the study are 12 and 24, respectively.
Data Management and Monitoring
The institutional review board of Shanghai Changhai Hospital will monitor the
reporting of adverse events and the quality of collected data on a semi-annual
basis. A planned interim analysis will be performed by the principle investigator
when the median postoperative follow-up reaches 1 year.
Statistical Analysis
Normally distributed continuous data will be described by means and ±SD as well as
95% confidence intervals. Non-normally distributed continuous data will be described
by median and range. Qualitative data will be described as percentages. BFS and RPFS
will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariable hazard
ratios will be calculated using the Cox proportional hazard model. For comparisons
between the baseline variables, the χ2 test and Fisher’s exact test will be
performed. P values<.05 will be considered statistically
significant.
Patient and Public Involvement
Patients or the public were not involved in the design of the present study.
Discussion
Metastasis-directed radiation can decrease the total tumour burden of oligometastatic
PCa patients. Preoperative radiation partially increases downstaging, and the
incorporation of neoadjuvant ADT further decreases the tumour stage and aims to
promote micrometastasis. Furthermore, the duration of treatment becomes shorter when
radiation is given preoperatively.For patients with oligometastatic PCa, a multimodality approach including
consolidated local treatment, metastasis-directed therapy and systemic hormonal
therapy might be the best option to minimize the risk of recurrence. Artificial
intelligence (AI) has shown promising value in terms of predicting survival and
treatment response in the near future of radiological diagnosis. Also, because
radiotherapy is a crucial component in our treatment modality, toxicity is often
challenging to predict. AI may also show its potential advantages in terms of
predicting treatment-induced adverse effect. In order to achieve a more accurate
initial evaluation, 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT was recommended for initial evaluation in our
protocol, with or without whole-body MRI, in which perfusion imaging contrast
uptake, ADC of MRI, liquid biopsy biomarkers and PSMA uptake activity were adopted
as potential biomarkers, in order to achieve a higher reetection rate of the bone
lesions from PSMA-PET/CT, as well as a higher soft tissue resolution of the primary
from whole-body MRI.[21,22]Some other metastatic cancers have shown improved clinical outcomes with a local
aggressive approach for primary tumours, and cytoreductive radical prostatectomy may
derive similar benefits in oligometastatic PCa by delaying the aggressive tumour
burden.[23,24] Several retrospective studies have found that the safety and
efficacy of radical prostatectomy in oligometastatic PCa with complication rates is
comparable to those of locally advanced PCa.[9,25-27] The first multicentre
retrospective study that included 106 patients with M1a-b PCa reported perioperative
complication (all Clavien 1-3) rates of 29%.
Gandaglia et al. reported 7-year clinical progression-free rates of 45% and
cancer-specific mortality-free survival rates of 82% in a cohort of 11 patients with
oligometastatic PCa.
Studies have shown the advantages of preoperative radiotherapy over
postoperative radiation in other malignancies.[28,29] Compared to postoperative
radiation, preoperative therapy has the following advantages. First, there is
improved oxygenation of target tissues in the neoadjuvant setting that decreases
radioresistance without altering the blood supply of the prostate.
Second, neoadjuvant radiation requires a lower dose for achieving the
equivalent level of tumour control, which helps reduce potential side effects.
Third, preoperative radiation can decrease viable cancer cells at the time of
radical prostatectomy and can sterilize extra-prostatic clonogenic stem cells in
close proximity to the gland, leading to a reduction in the probability of local recurrence.Furthermore, an increasingly large amount of data has shown that the adoption of SBRT
as a metastasis-directed therapy for metastatic lesions of oligometastatic PCa
provides excellent local control with minimal toxicity.[30-33] All of these studies reported
zero (0%) grade 3 toxicities using the CTCAE 5.0 criteria of adverse effects and
>95.5% local control rates. In the HORRAD trial and STAMPEDE trial, radiotherapy
to the prostate alone for patients with low burden metastatic disease has been
discussed with improved survival.[34,35] However, salvage RP may still
be necessary for these patients, should treatment failure be observed. Whether or
not neoadjuvant radiohormonal therapy may be a better solution is worthwhile to be
explored, which is different from salvage radical prostatectomy after external beam
radiotherapy in terms of lower overall dose of irradiation, better coverage of
clinically-visible lesions, as well as a shorter interval between RT and RP,
presenting a novel treatment modality for oligometastatic PCa. To the best of our
knowledge, our study is the first prospective trial to assess the safety and
feasibility of metastasis-directed radiation and neoadjuvant hormone and radiation
therapy followed by radical prostatectomy for oligometastatic PCa. Our project is
expected to be well tolerated with minimal Grade 3 or above acute or late
toxicities, with comparable perioperative comorbidities, pSM and continence
recovery, compared with RP for locally-advanced PCa reported in the literature.
Efficacy data in terms of postoperative PSA, treatment response, tumor regression
grade, BFS and RPFS may also provide useful information for future design of
randomized controlled trials (RCT). Therefore, RCT are required to address the
promising effects of metastasis-directed radiation and neoadjuvant hormone and
radiation therapy plus radical prostatectomy for oligometastatic PCa.Click here for additional data file.Supplemental Material for Safety and Efficacy Study of Neoadjuvant Radiohormonal
Therapy for Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: Protocol of an Open-Label,
Dose-Escalation, Single-Centre Phase I/II Clinical Trial by Xianzhi Zhao,
Yu-Tian Xiao, Yue Yang, Yusheng Ye, Yifan Chang, Lingong Jiang, Md Eftekhar,
Shancheng Ren, and Huojun Zhang in Cancer Control
Authors: Claire H Pernar; Ericka M Ebot; Kathryn M Wilson; Lorelei A Mucci Journal: Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med Date: 2018-12-03 Impact factor: 6.915
Authors: Christopher E Bayne; Stephen B Williams; Matthew R Cooperberg; Martin E Gleave; Markus Graefen; Francesco Montorsi; Giacomo Novara; Marc C Smaldone; Prasanna Sooriakumaran; Peter N Wiklund; Brian F Chapin Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2015-05-21 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Willem van Gijn; Corrie A M Marijnen; Iris D Nagtegaal; Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg; Hein Putter; Theo Wiggers; Harm J T Rutten; Lars Påhlman; Bengt Glimelius; Cornelis J H van de Velde Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2011-05-17 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Robert E Bristow; Rafael S Tomacruz; Deborah K Armstrong; Edward L Trimble; F J Montz Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-03-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Mark S Roh; Linda H Colangelo; Michael J O'Connell; Greg Yothers; Melvin Deutsch; Carmen J Allegra; Morton S Kahlenberg; Luis Baez-Diaz; Carol S Ursiny; Nicholas J Petrelli; Norman Wolmark Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-09-21 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Colleen A F Lawton; Jeff Michalski; Issam El-Naqa; Mark K Buyyounouski; W Robert Lee; Cynthia Menard; Elizabeth O'Meara; Seth A Rosenthal; Mark Ritter; Michael Seider Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2008-10-22 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Karel Decaestecker; Gert De Meerleer; Bieke Lambert; Louke Delrue; Valérie Fonteyne; Tom Claeys; Filip De Vos; Wouter Huysse; Arne Hautekiet; Gaethan Maes; Piet Ost Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2014-06-12 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Neil R Parikh; Amar U Kishan; Nathanael Kane; Silvia Diaz-Perez; Ekambaram Ganapathy; Ramin Nazarian; Carol Felix; Colleen Mathis; Margaret Bradley; Ankush Sachdeva; Bashir Wyatt; Vince Basehart; Nazy Zomorodian; Lin Lin; Christopher R King; Patrick A Kupelian; Matthew B Rettig; Michael L Steinberg; Minsong Cao; Beatrice S Knudsen; David Elashoff; Dorthe Schaue; Robert E Reiter; Nicholas G Nickols Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2020-06-17 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Nicholas D James; Melissa R Spears; Noel W Clarke; David P Dearnaley; Malcolm D Mason; Christopher C Parker; Alastair W S Ritchie; J Martin Russell; Francesca Schiavone; Gerhardt Attard; Johann S de Bono; Alison Birtle; Daniel S Engeler; Tony Elliott; David Matheson; Joe O'Sullivan; Delia Pudney; Narayanan Srihari; Jan Wallace; Jim Barber; Isabel Syndikus; Mahesh K B Parmar; Matthew R Sydes Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 31.777